The Stark law is a federal law, which was named after Pete Stark, a former congressman that created the law to prohibit physicians or doctors from referring patients to institutions where the doctors have a financial gain or relationship. The patients, however, must be Medicare patients. The relationship addressed, in this case, implies any financial relationship as a consequence of ownership or whether the doctor acquires financial compensation from referring the patient to the institution. The same law can also be examined under the physician referral law, which is stipulated in the Social Security Act, section 1877.
Management Responsibility and Violation Consequences In cases involving violation of the Stark laws, the penalties involve a denial of payment for the designated health service (DHS) or the
…show more content…
The kickbacks were in the form of on-call cash payments, free office space and paid trips to the Masters Golf Tournament. The expenses from these actions were later submitted as Medicare claims where the hospital would reap further benefits. The claims did not hold in court especially because there was no relationship between the hospital staff and the hospital. A parent company does not fall into the same category as the hospital. Therefore, the claim did not show how the hospital directly went against anti-kickback laws as stipulated in the laws. From a personal examination of the claim, the ruling of the case was not satisfactory because an examination of the actions undertaken by the parent company would have proved that physicians were still accepting kickbacks. The laws should be amended to include all actions undertaken by the parent or subsidiary companies. The strict nature of the law will reduce cases involving
The Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center case was then appealed by the plaintiffs. Facts: This is a civil case. The Plaintiff of this case is Timothy W. Gallagher, the parent of Jack O’Bannon Gallagher (deceased). Jack was sent to the emergency room after his high school nurse believed he might have abused a substance in which he was acting strangely and had elevated blood pressure. The decedent was omitted into the hospital and was seen by multiple medical professionals who evaluated both his physical health and mental state.
Medical Malpractice Case Study Karen Gonzalez Southern New Hampshire University The case of Smith vs. Haugland and the Iowa Heart and Vascular Clinic is a medical malpractice case in which the parties involved include the plaintiffs, a woman named Louetta Smith and her husband Richard and the defendant, a cardiologist named Dr. Frank Haugland and the clinic in which he practiced, the Iowa Heart and Vascular Care Clinic. The plaintiffs sued for malpractice after the defendant performed a procedure on Louetta in which she had complications and irreversible life changing harm. The plaintiffs believed that the defendant performed an unnecessary procedure and that he did not obtain an informed consent. Louetta Smith was 76 years
The complete lack of respect for the Hospital, the Hospital’s counsel, this Court, and the Rules of Civil Procedure shown by blatantly ignoring valid discovery requests for more than six months and this Court’s Order for more than two months indicate a willful disregard that require sanctions. Accordingly, the sanctions sought by the Hospital are necessary and are not excessive. Indeed, the Hospital requests that the Court give Defendant one more chance to meet his discovery obligations and comply with an order of this Court before the imposition of a default judgment in the Hospital’s favor.
St. David’s South Austin Medical Center (the “Hospital”) has received a letter from John Craven, an attorney representing former Hospital patient Ramona Reeves. Mr. Craven states that the Hospital’s entering into a Settlement Agreement with GEICO Insurance Company after the Hospital’s receipt of Ms. Reeves’ “HIPPA (sic) Revocation/Cancellation of Prior Authorization” constituted a wrongful disclosure of her individually identifiable health information (“PHI”). You have asked us to evaluate whether the provision of billing information and/or entering into the settlement agreement with GEICO violated HIPAA. The answer is no.
The patient had a prior relationship with the physician, as he had been her treating OBGYN with her son (Neyman v. Doshi, 2017).
As you know, we previously have taken the testimony of the claimant and a lay witness for the employer. We do not have an IME in this case but we are taking the testimony of the attending surgeon, Dr. Noce. Dr. Noce testified today that he was familiar with the claimant. He said he first saw the claimant at St. Peter’s emergency room just prior
The article describes correctional nursing as one of the hardest jobs to keep values in such, ethically and legally in a sense of what it means to be a nurse. The reason their job is so hard is they have to set aside their feelings and view on things they don’t necessarily agree with. Whereas, nurses in a hospital setting or clinic don’t have to make or choice if they want to help a patient, they just do because it’s the duty of the nurse under the American Nurse Association. The correctional nurse has to be able to deal with incarcerated inmates every day and on a daily basis. They have to be trustworthy of the inmates who may have done something against their beliefs and religion.
While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been essential accommodation on defendant. In this case the looking the material facts in the light most favorable to the Turner, it is difficult to conclude the material of the law, based on the evidence that Turners directly threaten to its employees or place an “Undue hardship” on Hershey. Therefore, the question whether Turners can perform the essential function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an open material fact for trial. Hershey will have a opportunities at trial to defeat Turners claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make vulnerable the health safety of its employees therefore an employer is not requires to accommodate an employee. Moreover, it would carry out an undue hardship that even with the accommodation.
Impact of CMS Regulations and Reimbursement Models The Health Care Industry HCM307-1802B-03 Unit 1- Individual Project 1 Michael Green May 22, 2018 Introduction Healing Hands Hospital is preparing financially for the many different reimbursement changes associated with Medicare Advantage Plans. My financial team and I, have been asked to evaluate our current billing and operations workflow processes and incorporate the current trends. We will be discussing how Medicare Advantage affects Healing Hands Hospital, and how we can utilize these trends to maximize patient care. Organizational Budget Reimbursement and financial trends will change go hand and hand.
Thomas qaagree to $750k settlement for HIPAA violations. These days it is very often that we heard about the hospital or medical practice was fined by the Health and the Human Service(HHS) due to the breach of the patient data. The security breaches of HIPAA mainly concerned with bad IT system design, bad user behavior, bad policies and bad operations. The US department of Health and Human Services(HHS) office for civil rights is trying to enforce HIPAA rules on hospital or medical practices to protect the patient data.
In the case of Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists, the respondent brought an antitrust action against Abbott Laboratories claiming that they had violated the Robinson-Patman Act. The pharmaceutical manufacturers had sold drugs to not-for-profit hospitals at lower prices then to the commercial pharmacies (Showalter, pg 452). The Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, which was an amendment to the Clayton Antitrust Act (Elfand, n.d.), had made it unlawful to discriminate by placing a pricing difference between buyers of similar goods, when “the effect of such discrimination may be substantially to lessen competition” (Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists, 1976). As the petitioners, Abbott Laboratories claimed that the price
In the book “The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks,” Rebecca Skloot identifies a part of the book that talks about a patient’s consent to certain treatments at the Hospital. She specifically talks about how Henrietta was given an informed consent form, which she signed before she was given treatment; However, health consent forms could be argued back and forth in relation to how they worked back then, because with or without them Doctors still experimented on patients without their consents compared to these enlightened days where patients are in complete control of knowing what the doctor does with their bodies. Like Deborah said and if you want to go into history don’t go into it with a premeditated judgment like hate, one just has to understand that it wasn’t the fault of the people but the naivety of those times. A true case of patients where patients were left in the dark about a treatment was the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment where patients were just given a vague explanation to what they were
One of the well-known federal fraud and abuse statutes in the United States is the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which greatly influences business relationships in the pharmaceutical, healthcare and medical device sectors. This statute is an Anti-Corruption law, which is designed to protect beneficiaries of the federal health care program from money influence on various referral decisions. Thus, this law helps in guarding against an increase in costs, overutilization and poor quality services. However, this law needs some modifications to become more efficient to all the U.S citizens. The lawmakers in the country should take the initiative of amending this bill so as to ensure that they adequately represent the interests of those people who
I think it’s wrong for the government to penalize physicians for not meeting compliance standards. However, It’s a great opportunity for the government to aim at small practices because this is where physicians are self-employed. These types of physicians have numerous clinic or health care facilities and are most likely to commit fraud. This seems kind of biased, but it’s true. According to, Ornstein, the most common sanctions are against physicians who have odd Medicare billing reputations (2014, title).
It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.