Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Laws

1121 Words5 Pages
The United States should not add stricter gun laws because Guns are used to protect people,guns are used for hunting,and the guns are not the problem the people using them are the problem. If guns were in the right hands then there would be no reason to ban them.
The United States should not add stricter gun laws because gun are used to protect other people. People use guns to protect themselves from bad people trying to kill them. As an example, someone walks into someones house and tries to kill that person, if there are stricter gun laws then you might not be able to shoot back at them. Also guns should not have stricter laws because they are used for hunting. There are thousands of hunters across the United States that would be very upset if they had their guns taken away. Although some hunters could use a bow to hunt with,there are just a few people that would really prefer using the gun that got taken away from them. Lastly,guns are not the problem and should not be restricted but the people using them should be restricted from using them. Most mass school shooting the history behind most of the victims is that they usually have some kind of disability or have had a rough life or even depression.That 's why if the government has stricter gun laws there is no point since it 's the people and not the weapon.
Therefore since guns are used to protect people,used for hunting,and the guns are not the problem it is the people,guns should not be banned or have stricter gun

More about Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Laws

Open Document