Criminals will always find ways to get guns and banning handguns will certainly not stop them. John Stossel does make a good point when he states that having laws against guns is also restricting self defense on people. Taking away the ability to buy handguns leaves citizens with less self-defense options. This raises a much bigger and serious problem, leaving people vulnerable by taking away their right to self defense and Stossel (2008) is correct to say that gun bans preventing citizens from using guns in self-defense, and giving criminals a much bigger advantage. It is naive to think that banning handguns will keep a criminal from breaking the law.
Then there are the people that want to put a restriction on the amount of some guns sold. (LaFollette) Gun control is a very debated topic because of the recent shootings. But, what the people need to realize is that it wasn’t the guns walking around killing people, there have to be people behind these guns. We need to control our people before we take it out on the guns. Owning a firearm is a big responsibility and we need to keep that responsibility in the hands of the people that can handle it.
America needs stricter gun control laws because they will help decrease the immense number of gun deaths every day and lessen the chances of the wrong person getting their hands on a gun. People opposed to implementing more gun control often argue that more gun control will make it so that they are not able to have a gun to use for self defense. What many of these people fail to realize is that creating more gun control will not take away their right to owning a gun. All more gun control will do is make it harder for the wrong people to get their hands on a gun. They also argue that criminals will find a way to get a gun even if more gun control measure are put into place.
David DeGrazia proposes a moderate control of guns meaning that only individuals with a need for self-protection be allowed to own a gun and only after a complete course in safety (Hsiao and Berstein). DeGrazia also believes that owning a gun increases the likelihood that a person will be killed in their own home whether accidentally or intentionally (Hsiao and Berstein). The Democratic Party believes that stricter background checks will deter guns from being purchased by the wrong people. That might be true, but will it stop a violent person from committing a
Somewhere in the region of about “32 percent of americans want guns to stay legal,” (“Politics”). The anti gun-control advocates say that banning guns will only encourage criminals to commit crimes because average citizens will no longer have a firearm to protect themselves from these criminals or to use when they go hunt for animals. This would increase the crime rate by criminals being more tempted to commit a crime if they knew that the victim was armed with a gun. The NRA, which stands for National Rifle Association does not want normal people to be punished for the acts of criminals. The NRA was created to regulate the guns that are sold and what is needed before a gun is sold to a gun owner.
Stephanie Fraser didn't think that there was anything that could’ve been done to prevent that night from happening unless we had metal detectors wherever we went, but that’s a bit insane. She believes that there should be better security in places like hotels and schools so that we wouldn't get a repeat of what happened. Gun control wasn’t the issue and rather it was on the lack of security we have in our hotels. In the last political cartoon by Siers, it says that we need guns to protect is from rising gun violence, so by having guns, it will reduce the amount of gun violence that’s occurring these days. Guns aren’t the problem, people
Why Americans Need Guns The right to bear arms helps protect ourselves and our families. It is our constitutional right to bear arms and I believe it should not be taken away. Some people think if we did not have guns there would be less crime in the United States, but that is not true. When a person purchases a gun at a store they have to register that gun in their name, unless they buy a used one from someone else. If guns are banned the government will take innocent civilian guns away, because they have them registered in their names.
Just the presence of a gun makes an act of domestic violence much more likely to end in death. So why would anyone ponder on the idea of carrying concealed firearms to college campuses? Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the decision “should not be taken to cast doubt on … laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings”, Scalia easily distinguishes the difference between security and danger towards the individual, therefore; States should also recognize the unique nature of college campuses and keep the guns
Regarding the statement that whether citizens in United States should own guns, some people would say that arming themselves can prevent tragedy from occurring, while others assume that owning guns has been caused some problems and risks of violent events yearly.I tend to agree that guns for citizens should be reasonably banned in United States because of to reduce deaths from shootings and feasible solutions of gun-banning life. Guns in America has been already caused a large number of problems such as shooting and killing events. Guns are sometimes not considered as defending tools. Instead, they become dangerous toys and even for entertainment because some of youth consider that holding a real gun like characters in movies excites them. Some of them do not have the consciousness that guns can be factually used to kill livings.
Because here is the thing: Guns don’t kill people. People kill people, and society doesn’t seem to understand that. The trigger of a gun doesn’t go off on its own, people have to pull the trigger in order for the gun to work. We have had these amendments in place for a really long time now, and now people expect them to go away? The only reason people want them gone is because PEOPLE are the ones misusing them.