ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

774 Words4 Pages

The Revolutionary War had ended and the colonies successfully signed a treaty of paris with England, proclaiming their independence from Britain and establishing other terms of the treaty. No longer were the colonies divided, they had now become the United States of America and consisted of states. Throughout the colonists' "road to recovery" from Britain, and their journey to becoming a successful and powerful nation, they were faced with numerous challenges including one large one - creating a country! They needed to establish a strong but restricted central government, create a set of fair rules, laws, and regulations, and elect political leaders to represent each state and the nation as a whole, thus, the Articles of Confederation …show more content…

It seemed like a great idea at first, shifting power to different areas so as not to give a certain state or person too much power. Little did they know, however, that there were many flaws with the document. It not only limited Congress' power regarding several aspects of the government, but it also caused an economic depression for everyone by causing tax and trade issues amongst the states and foreign countries, as well as, it also prevented Congress from pressuring people to pay taxes. After two serious incidents occurred and numerous complaints from Congress, a constitutional convention occurred in 1787 at Independence Hall. During this time, delegates debated which plans, the Virginia Plan or the New Jersey Plan, should be used a basis for their new government. Changes like shifting power evenly between states and Congress had to …show more content…

On September 17, 1787, the convention ended when 38 delegates signed the Constitution and it was finally ratified on May 29, 1790. The Bill of Rights was added not too long after in 1791. In my opinion, for this instance, I believe that compromise was a reasonable decision although I do not believe it is the best option for everyone because sometimes you may not get everything you want/need by choosing something over another, as well as, compromising can cause conflict between both

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    Articles of Confederation was the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.” The Articles were needed after the United States won war. There was no unity among the country. They used the Articles as their set of rules. There were many important people that had to do with the constitution.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Articles Of Confederation

    578 Words  | 3 Pages

    er, the Articles placed the power in the hands of the state, which led to economic troubles; but it also led to leadership shortfall. The fact that there was no independent judiciary, no leader of foreign affairs, and an inability to deal with internal and external threats made, caused a lot of problems for America. Finally, the Articles of Confederation was ineffective in making a set of rules that made legislating under this structure inefficient. Each state had one vote, therefore, states with a large population or small population had the same weight in voting in Congress. It also took nine votes out of thirteen to approve legislation.

    Read More

  • Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan

    485 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the year 1787, in the United States, the constitutional convention meet to solve the problems from the original constitution, the articles of confederation. There goal was to either write a new constitution, or amend the original constitution with a stronger central government. When the convention first started, the representatives from Virginia took a leading role and proposed the first plan, known as the Virginia Plan. With this plan, it was proposed that the articles of confederation be completely replaced with a new constitution. Many states opposed this plan and the representatives from New Jersey proposed a new plan, known as the New Jersey Plan.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Dbq

    398 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitutional Convention took place from May 25th, 1787 to September 17th, 1787 in the city of Philadelphia. The official purpose of the convention was to amend the articles of Confederation/ how the country was going to be governed. Although the convention had been called for revising the Articles of Confederation, two delegates (James Madison and Alexander Hamilton) wanted to make a totally new government. Seventy delegates from each original state were supposed to come to the Constitutional Convention, but only 55 out of the 70 arrived. The first two months of debating were only about the 15 points of the “Virginia Plan” that James Madison thought of to replace the Articles of Confederation.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    825 Words  | 4 Pages

    Liberty Sumners 712 The Articles of Confederation were a great change to our Government. With time spent using this system, we realized the weaknesses associated with it. This lead to the Constitutional Convention being convened on 1787 in Philadelphia. We needed to find out what was weakening our Government.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Dbq

    372 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitutional Convention in 1787 held many problems however, they were resolved. The Constitutional Convention had two questions. How would they strengthen the national government without taking any power from the states? and, How would they balance the interests of both the wealthy and those that aren’t wealthy? 55 men agreed to make a compromise, and therefore the Constitution became a bundle of compromises.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Vs Federalism Dbq

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    In May of 1787, 55 delegates came to Philadelphia to have a Constitutional Convention. They had this meeting so they could make the U.S. Constitution. They wanted to make one because the articles of the Confederation were not working. They wanted to make a Constitution that would benefit the U.S. The Constitution also guarded against tyranny in 4 different ways, Federalism, Separation of powers, checks and balances and big State little State, compromise.

    Read More

  • Should The Articles Of Confederation Be Ratified

    316 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the colonies split from Britain they created a government plan called the articles of confederation. This gave power to the individual states rather than a central power. This proved to not be effective so a rewrite was called. Eventually with help from the Constitutional Convention the Constitution was ratified. This was good, the Articles of Confederation were full of problems and a new document needed to be ratified.

    Read More

  • Essay On Why The Constitution Should Be Ratified

    1406 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Revolutionary War ended and now the Articles of Confederation are showing how weak they really are. On May 25th - September 25th 1787, delegates led by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton came together to fix the Articles of Confederation, but ended up creating a whole new document. That Document was the Constitution. After that, the whole country was debating whether the Constitution should be ratified. Based on the sources, the Constitution should have been ratified because the country was in economic distress, the nation was vulnerable, and the authors wanted the best for the country.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Vs Unifying The Constitution

    479 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitution had a much stronger centralized government, which enforced democracy. The Constitution was created for the people, to secure the natural born rights, like the freedom of speech. In 1787, the Constitutions final text was finished and was said to have been about 4,200 words in length and on the final day of the Constitutional Convention in 1787 Benjamin Franklin said “I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such because I think a central government is necessary for us… I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain may be able to make a better Constitution.” Soon after the colonies including Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut ratified the constitution, but many states including Massachusetts opposed the constitution because it was said to have lacked reserved undelegated powers to the states and constitutional protection of basic political rights.

    Read More

  • Confederation Vs Constitution

    1220 Words  | 5 Pages

    With the victory against England the newly independent Americans earned an official claim to America and needed to establish a written plan of government for the new states. The Americans sought to implement some form of sovereignty without total power or any influences of monarchy. In 1777, the congressmen generated the Articles of Confederation, defining the union as a “loose confederation of states” existing mainly to “foster a common defense” (Roark 190). However, the Articles of Confederation had many flaws and imperfections. Because it provoked too many conflicts, the Articles of Confederation resulted in failure and was ultimately overturned by an improved document of government, the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    Eventually, they came to a compromise and added a bill of right, later on, the Constitution was

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    1304 Words  | 6 Pages

    To rectify the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, a constitutional convention created a federal system and built into it practical devices to control factions who would otherwise pursue their own ends to the detriment of the larger society. Those safeguards were representative government, three branches of government that contained checks and balances, and a federal system. The branches are similar in their organization with elected leaders, legislators and judges. However, some states appoint their judges while the President decides Supreme Court Judges.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    724 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

Open Document