ipl-logo

Compromise: A Solution To A Conflict Between Northern And Southern States In 1787

1524 Words7 Pages

The ⅗ Compromise was a solution to a conflict between the United States northern and southern states in 1787. The conflict was whether or not enslaved people would be counted as representing a whole person when it came to representation in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives in Congress. It was decided that each slave would represent ⅗ of the value of a free person. The impact of this compromise was that it temporarily solved a problem that could have kept our country from moving forward as a new nation. The ⅗ Compromise allowed our country to ratify the US Constitution in 1790 but also pointed out the great flaw of slavery in our nation and opened our eyes to the reality of slavery and how the slaves weren’t treated like ⅗ of a person at all.

In 1783 the Continental Congress first brought up the idea of how slaves should be …show more content…

The Civil War started April 12, 1861 and lasted till May 13, 1865 and after the war the thirteenth amendment was made. The ⅗ clause was repealed when the thirteenth amendment was enacted after the war because it outlawed slavery. Yet after the Civil War the southern states got more representation,”Ironically, the South, after initiating and carrying on a civil war for four years, would substantially increase its strength in the House of Representatives” (Levy, 2692). When the Civil War ended in 1865, it allowed the country to come together to outlaw slavery with the thirteenth amendment making the ⅗ clause obsolete and rendering it useless because the thirteenth amendment outlawed slavery. It took a long time before slavery was abolished completely because even though many people did believe that slavery was bad some other people who believed very deeply in slavery and still believed that enslaved people were only property and should not be allowed to be represented as a free person or be free at

Show More
Related

  • Reasons For The Compromise Of 1877 Dbq

    133 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1877 was brought to attention recently, shortly after the Presidential Election of 1876. It called to resolve the disputed 1876 presidential elections in the United States. This was supposedly a deal to make it so Rutherford Hayes, the Republican Party candidate running for president, could become president. The Democrats would also become powerful in the governments within the South. Having Hayes, when he would become president, promise to allow troops to be pulled out of the rebelling states and slave states out of the South, it would the Democrats to become just that.

    Read More

  • Why Was George Washington Considered To Be One Of The Greatest Presidents

    1897 Words  | 8 Pages

    The compromise was not a true compromise at all, it preserved the Union and brought temporary peace. Within the compromise, the fugitive slave law was passed, allowing slaveholder to capture runaway slaves, and make them return to their original owner. Underground railroads were established, which allowed slaves to runaway underground to small stations located in the north, and oftentimes in Canada. A hero to a lot of slaves, Harriet Tubman, escaped slavery from Maryland, and returned to the South numerous times to help guide more than three hundred slaves to the north and gain freedom. Slavery was extremely evident during this time period and was “needed” to help connect both sides of the United States.

    Read More

  • What Is The Compromise Of 1877 Dbq

    364 Words  | 2 Pages

    The compromise was a backhanded deal that decided the controversial election of 1876 between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden. This lead to a power vacuum that lead to the KKK and old confederate leaders being able to

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Framers

    1364 Words  | 6 Pages

    I think that the framers should have not made the compromises because it was not fair to the slaves, it was possibly the only way to reach an This clause is evidence of the fact that the “Framers anticipated the possibility of evasions of the restrictions they created. The clause also seems to point to the vulnerability and unpopularity of the slave trade. If the trade had not been questioned, this clause may have never been included in the Constitution. In a way, it legitimized the future abolition of the slave trade. The provisions seem to hint to the fact that had the clause not been put there, Congress could have immediately abolished the trading of

    Read More

  • What Is The Sally Hemmings Statement Of Equality

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1787, Rutledge stated that “the true question is whether the Southern States will or will not be changed to confederate otherwise… the Southern States will not be confederate at all”. This quote shows that the issue of slavery was a significant factor in the formation of the Constitution and that the authors were willing to compromise on the principle of equality to form a cohesive union. It is important to note that the Constitution did not explicitly mention slavery, but it did include clauses that protected the institution. The Three-Fifths Compromise, for example, counted each slaved person as the three-fifths of a person to determine representation in Congress. This compromise gave Southern states more representation in Congress, which allowed them to maintain a balance of power and protect their interests, including the continuation of

    Read More

  • 10 Facts About The Emancipation Proclamation Of 1860

    919 Words  | 4 Pages

    The civil war was not started in an attempt to abolish slavery, but to reunify the United States. Many of the slaves didn’t see it this way. They saw it as a way to freedom. General Benjamin F. Butler would take in the slaves as “contraband of war” since they were seen as property to the south. In 1861, the First Confiscation Act authorized the members of the union to confiscate any property the confederates were using to assist them in the war.

    Read More

  • Policy On Slavery In 1860

    279 Words  | 2 Pages

    As new states became free states, the pro slavery cultures viewed these motives as undermining of their system. When Republican President Lincoln became elected in 1861 the south went into a panic and began succeeding from the Union. The war took off in a effort to rejoin the states. In the beginning of the war, slavery wasn’t touched. Blacks that fell into Union hands were returned

    Read More

  • Reasons For The Great Compromise Of 1877

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Great Compromise of 1877 would solve the problem of the land in the South and the government that controlled it, but it would betray the African-Americans and would lead to the future development of the Jim Crow South, Future terrorizing of African-Americans, and for the government no longer supporting their freedom and their rights. The Great Compromise would lead to the Jim Crow South which was an idea made by a group of people, but made into reality where they would push for it to be implemented into the government. Where the African-Americans would experience segregation and the slogan that would help support this segregation was “separate but equal” where African-Americans were not treated equal. They would have worse bathrooms, schools, water fountains, parks , chairs and such because of this segregation.

    Read More

  • The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

    1593 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Essay

    1563 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay Civil War

    533 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Civil War is characterized as the bloodiest war in American History. From 1861 to 1865, the North and South fought over several of disagreements and encounters. The Civil War caused hundreds and thousands of men to lose their life, about 620,000 soldiers had died. The Civil War was fought in Pennsylvania, Texas, New Mexico, and Florida. Civil War began because the North wanted to abolish slavery, the South seceded from the Union, and the North overpowered the South.

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay About The 13th Amendment

    928 Words  | 4 Pages

    " One of America's most horrific sin’s that we are not proud of is Slavery. The 13th amendment was passed by the congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the states on december 6, 1865. President Lincoln made the Emancipation Proclamation declaring “all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward,

    Read More

More about Compromise: A Solution To A Conflict Between Northern And Southern States In 1787

Open Document