ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

1743 Words7 Pages

The late 17th century was a time of radical transformations and floods of independence. As the United States developed, a government that suited the needs of its citizens was imperative for the success and flourish of the new nation. The Constitution surfaced as a document to placate those dissatisfied by the distasteful Articles of Confederation. The numerous conciliations and adaptations composing the document have led to the term “bundle of compromises.” The ever-changing nature of the Constitution has resulted in it being considered a “living document” in the present day.
a) The Preamble to the Constitution was written by Gouverneur Morris with the intent of setting goals for the newly formed nation- goals that are continued to be accomplished …show more content…

Each branch is “checked” or restrained by the other two in several different ways. For example, the president can veto a law passed by Congress. However, Congress is able to override this veto if there is a vote of two-thirds in both houses. Even if the President and Congress agree on a law, the Supreme Court has the power to declare a law unconstitutional. President Andrew Jackson utilized his veto power when he vetoed the Bill for Re-chartering the Second Bank of the United …show more content…

Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the Federalists, they believed in the loose construction of the Constitution and were pro- Great Britain and industry. They believed that the wealthy and educated should lead and favored a strong-central government. The Antifederalists, on the other hand, were led by Thomas Jefferson and believed in the strict construction of the Constitution. They were pro- France and farming and favored a strong-state government in which the people were to lead. The two opposing parties were forced to compromise in order for New York to ratify the

Show More
Related

  • The Summer Of 1787 By David O Stewart Sparknotes

    1497 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Summer of 1787 was written by David O. Stewart as a historical, non-fiction recount of the events leading to the Constitutions adoption hundreds of years ago. David O. Stewart is extremely qualified to put together such a book. Mr. Stewart is a prolific author in matters of politics and history. In addition, Mr. Stewart studied law at Yale, a highly praised institution. From his studies in modern law to reading all 500 pages of James Madison’s notes from the constitutional convention, Mr. Stewart has the motivation and intelligence to effectively narrate the time before the constitutions implementation.

    Read More

  • How Did Louisiana Purchase Contribute To Hamilton's Transfer Of Power

    512 Words  | 3 Pages

    From the time the Constitution was adopted in 1789 to the Missouri Compromise in 1820 a shift in power occurred, this resulted in an expansion of the national governments authority over political and economic matters at the states expense. Hamilton’s economic policies, Marshall Supreme Court decisions, and the Louisiana Purchase were the fundamental factors that lead to this transfer of power. Though not without a fight from the Jefferson Democratic Republican party who supported a limited government and a strict construction, whereas the ultimate contributors to this exchange, the federalist, wanted to extend the powers of the government in order to create institutions that could strengthen the new country. However, despite opposition and pleas against these matters, the means and support behind the federal government proved to strong to prevent this sway and power.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation Constitution

    264 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitution came to fruition as an answer for the issues and numerous shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation. Not every person concurred with the Constitution or even the said issues emerging from the Articles of Confederation. These people were called Anti-Federalists and their thoughts would not be as effective as the thoughts of the Federalists, since Anti-Federalist thought's reflected numerous qualities of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution should have been endorsed with a specific end goal to conjure change and solvethe issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists had the plans to make the country the best is could be, and also sufficiently giving rights to citizens.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

    605 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the ‘New World’ declared independence in 1776, by 1787 the United States of America had yet to agree on a constitution that would satisfy the varying needs of each existing state. One of the major debates was over whether the new legislature would give each state representatives based on that state's population or if each state would have equal representation. The larger states desired more influence with proportional representation, but the smaller ones feared that their views would be encroached on if such a system were put into place. The proposal came from Roger Sherman, a Superior Court Judge of Connecticut, who had previously been a delegate during the independence debates of 1776.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are countless Arguments both for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. Some of the main arguments of the Federalist include that a strong National government offered protection for the people’s rights, the government would benefit from a 3 branch system and a system of checks and balances needed to be created. Some of the main ideas of the anti-federalist were that the National Government would have too much power, a Bill of Right needed to be added, the constitutions effect of the government would be too tyrannical, and that the federal court system would be too powerful. Considered the Father of the Constitution, James Madison was detrimental in the creation In the US Constitution.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the ratification of the Articles of Confederation in 1781, a sense of nationalism and unity swept across the young United States of America. Unfortunately, with youth, comes inexperience. It did not take long for numerous problems to be noticed under the Articles including a weak central government, no national judicial system, and little coined money. Due to the controversy and disorder arisen by the Articles of Confederation, the delegates of the United States joined for the 2nd Constitutional Convention in 1787 to make reparations. The top scholars of the nation intended to repair the existing government but instead, created a whole new one.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution

    1626 Words  | 7 Pages

    The United States Constitution has created much debate since the moment it was conscripted. It has been argued that Constitution of the United States is a document that was drafted in response to the evolution of society. Others have argued that the creation of the Constitution was made as an effort to create a strong national government that was capable of exercising real authority and preservation of ideals in the revolution. The American Constitution is seen as being reactionary because the founders of the Constitution wanted to react to change in restoration of the previous state. The U.S. Constitution is considered reactionary because one should consider the events, documents, and people who participated in the era of the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

    530 Words  | 3 Pages

    After securing its independence from Britain, America was immediately faced with a crisis of how the budding country should be governed. The Articles of Confederation was the first effort to establish a democratic government in the US; however, this feeble attempt at a creating a stable government failed due to a lack of control over the states. Rather than a functioning authority in the nation, the Articles created a “firm league of friendship” between the states. To remedy this pathetic excuse for a ruling body, a Constitution was drafted, and rival sides emerged quickly on the main issues the new document was supposed to address. Two men that embodied this conflict were Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, both passionate patriots who strongly believed that their proposed forms of government were in the best interests of the country, but they disagreed fundamentally on what that form of government should be.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    450 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Outcry The Constitutional Convention proved to solve the paradox of democracy because it created a strong government that balanced its powers equally. The “Great Compromise” is an example of how to address the minority rights and majority rule without resulting in anarchy or tyranny. The Government should use more compromises that will benefit both the minority and the majority equally. The Constitutional Convention took place because “the Articles of Confederation proved to be too weak to govern its citizens” (History).

    Read More

  • Central Focus And Purpose Of The Constitutional Convention

    647 Words  | 3 Pages

    The central focus and purpose of the content I will teach in this learning segment is to demonstrate to my students how the Constitutional Convention shaped America into what it is today. Another central focus of this content is to discuss how much freedom and responsibility citizens should have. b. Given the central focus, describe how the standards and learning objectives within your learning segment address ϒ facts and concepts Key terms: Articles of Confederation, Shay’s Rebellion, Consitutional Convention, 3/5 Compromise, Virgina Plan, New Jersey Plan, The Great Compromise, Federalists, Anti-Federalists, and The Consitution.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    127 Words  | 1 Pages

    Three distinguished delegates to the Constitutional Convention rejected the idea of signing the Constitution. Edmund Randolph, who had submitted the Virginia Plan, could not extend his approval of the Constitution as formulated because he thought it assigned disproportionate authority to Congress. Therefore, he issued an inquiry to the delegates to present the Constitution to state governments so that they might advise amendments and modifications. Furthermore, George Mason was discouraged by the Convention 's noncompliance to prohibit the slave trade. Mason was also concerned as the Convention 's refused to implement a bill of rights.

    Read More

  • The Constitution Pros And Cons

    841 Words  | 4 Pages

    The U.S. Constitution The U.S. constitution established America’s fundamental laws, National Government, and guaranteed rights for the citizens. We needed this document because our national government was weak and the states where separated into independent countries. There was not a president and this gave congress the power to govern foreign affairs, conduct war and regulate currency. After the United States gained independence from Great Britain our country needed a stronger central government.

    Read More

  • The Best Constitution Pros And Cons

    588 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Best Constitution The United States’ constitution is one of the most important documents in history. It lists our rights and privileges as citizens of the US, states the role of government, and contains all of the laws we use today. These things-and more- make it an extremely well-written document. It is strongly revered by historians and regular people alike.

    Read More

  • Max Farrand The Constitution And The Pros Of The Confederation Summary

    934 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his article “The Federal Constitution and the Defects of The Confederation”, Max Farrand delves back into the 1700s in order to examine the creation of the Constitution and even moreso the reasons behind its inception. The Constitutional Convention was a very interesting event that has always had some historical mystery and even some common ignorance around what happened at the convention. As a way to inform the people reading this articles of the intentions of the convention, Farrand formulates his thesis around this idea of how and why the Constitution was made. On the first page of his article, he states, “That the Constitution was framed because of the defects in the Articles of Confederation is universally accepted, but it does not

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    637 Words  | 3 Pages

    The main goal was to create an effective federal government, while safeguarding individual liberties. The debates were heated and there were several divisions, however three key compromises made the Constitution possible. The first issue was about giving fair representation to both large and small states. James Madison’s, Virginia Plan proposed to create a Congress with

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

Open Document