Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms rely on the fact that the supply for such rights is treasured in their constitution. In this place of growing violence, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the United States, possessing a gun is a fundamental right and may even be a necessity to some. Anti-gun lobbyists address the same growing violence and gun-related crimes as an effort to call on the government to take action. By putting down more laws and stricter control, these people that are not in favor of guns, feel society would be a

The debate on the Second Amendment, and many cases have been reviewed by the Supreme Court to determine what exactly it means. The Second Amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The debate is over what the Second Amendment means when it says “the right of the people to keep and bear arms”. Those in favor of gun control believe that putting more restrictions on guns will make America safer and reduce the number of deaths in our country. They claim that the Amendment protects the right to arming a militia, which we now call the National Guard, but nothing beyond that. Those opposed to gun control believe that restricting guns will make our country more dangerous because countries with higher gun control have

In the beginning of the United States, Property Rights were the most protected rights. This was because many Americans asserted that persons responsible for state and national constitutions were to be committed to protecting Property Rights, as this was the most important part of securing their national freedom. This influenced Judicial Review to consider many restrictions to the freedom of property as unconstitutional. Other rights such as the Freedom of Speech and Equality, were not considered as important and received far less protection. In regards to free speech, the consensus was that citizens had right to speak, think, and write freely but with decency and truth.

Gun control has been a national issue for decades, if not centuries. The founding fathers created the Second Amendment that protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This amendment was passed as part of the Bill of Rights and simply recognizing something that has existed or will continue to exist in the future. It was also another check on the government, if the people had no weapons to rebel against them, the government can oppress them easily and would make it easier for the government to assemble militia in a time of war. This Second Amendment doesn’t also mean that the people can’t have some measure of control in these extremely dangerous weapons.

It suggests that the government, but more specifically Congress, puts gun violence above the means of fighting against it. Even more so, it shows that gun violence reins over attempts to hinder it in any way and how Congress is weak because it consistently fails to effectively do anything about gun violence in America. However, congressional gridlock can be more than Congress’ refusal to pass laws that are important The United States’ wellbeing. It can be the slow-moving process of passing a law or bill to benefit Americans. For example, immigration reform has been being considered since past President Barack Obama was reelected in 2012, as stated by The Washington Post (Nakamura, O’Keefe 4).

Was Johnson really exercising his right to free speech while burning the American flag? Some would argue he did, but others will say he didn’t. In most cases, majority would say he wasn’t practicing free speech which lead him to dishonor the U.S. flag. Flag burning will endanger the symbol of the role as representation of nationhood and national unity. We would be permitting a Sate to “prescribe what shall be orthodox” by saying that one may burn the flag to convey one’s attitude toward it and its referents only if one does not endanger the flag’s representation.

Firstly, when Will said ‘To end the practice of “birthright citizenship,” all that is required is to correct the misinterpretation of that amendment first sentence’ (601). How could anybody say it was a misinterpretation on something that someone else wrote? We as a nation should look at immigrants not as a threat, but for an opportunity for a friendship. Some people might not have been able to go anywhere, so they came to America to feel relived from the stress that was put a pond them. Thus, many might not like people coming over to the “land of the free”, but what

putting some control back into the hands of the people) it also blurs the lines as to what violates the Constitution and what does not. For example, the Second Amendment reads, “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." While that may be a basic right given to Americans, one wonders the definition of “arms”. Does that mean people have the right to own a revolver or pistol, or does it mean they can own weapons as extreme as AK-47s, bazookas or grenades? If the framers were drafting the document today, each article and amendment would need to be much lengthier in order to specify what is constitutional and what is not.

This quote by Ted Yoho asserts the importance of the United States Constitution in establishing our beliefs. Even though this document made a great impact on our nation at the time of its writing, the path to ratification was not straight forward. In the summer of 1787, debate was waged in the newspapers, articles, and state conventions regarding the division of power among groups. The Federalists favored a strong national government and therefore, supported the Constitution. The opponents, however, named themselves the Anti-Federalists, and they argued that the new plan handed too much power to the central government.

In my speech today I would like to talk about gun violence in America and why i think that gun control will be a bad idea to support . Guns don’t Kill People ! People Kill People . Gun control does nothing to control criminals because when you ban guns from people the criminals will always have ways to get guns ! What we really want as people is to ban violence and murder and insanity , because we all know deep in our heart that violence murder and insanity is build in human condition that we don 't talk about.

Perry we see the issue regarding the major political issue of the legalization of same-sex marriages. While some individuals rebuke or chastise homosexuality, other individuals will embrace it as just another aspect of life a average norm to be. We must questions the reason for the early determination of same sex marriage constitutionality. When it comes down to it, our society is just making it illegal for people that live their lives differently from the majority of us. It is inequitable for our government to decide on whether or not homosexuals can be married.

In an interview, he states, “Last I heard, we had a Constitution in this country which gave all of our people the right of religious freedom…” (“Sanders: Turning Our Backs on Refugees Destroys the Idea of America”). He believes that turning our back on the Muslim refugees who are trying to escape violence and persecution destroys the idea of America. Our country is supposed to be a welcoming place and to stand for equality for all, but denying the right of people trying to live a better life undermines America as a

The GOP support Second Amendment rights, the right to bear arms, to ensure that everyone has the ability to defend themselves not only from criminals, but also from enemies trying to attack. Abortion is not viewed favorably by most Republicans and neither is stem-cell research. The Republicans are also mainly against LGBT marriage rights but not just because they do not agree with the idea, but because they believe the decision should be left to the states. The Democrats are the complete opposite. Democrats try to limit the Second Amendment as much as possible.

All freedoms should have a restriction somewhere, and this limitation should happen when one breaks a law for the purpose of a religion. Americans should have their freedoms, but safety is even more important. Harming others for the purpose of a religion is a threat to society, and can bring down the nation. It is not fair for the purpose of people to break the law just because of a religious belief, while other people get punished for breaking the law. The first amendment is a controversial topic that still gets debated today.

To go into more detail, Mississippi has created a law to where doctors can refuse to provide medical care to he or she that are homosexual, as well as therapist do not have to counsel them either. It create fear towards LGBT community because that is the betrayal on their own government that does not have their back, but then who does. It 's our responsibility to stand with the LGBT community and to demand the government for their equal right because they are human being like the rest of us. If not how are we supposed to grow as a society is there is conflict on what we are and what need