ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

1904 Words8 Pages

The Second Amendment offers U.S. residents the right to keep arms. Sanctioned in December 1791, the modification states: James Madison primarily suggested the Second modification briefly immediately after the Constitution was legally sanctioned as a means to supply more energy to state militias, which today are regarded the National Guard. It was regarded an agreement amongst Federalists — those who promoted the Constitution as it was sanctioned — and the anti-Federalists — individuals who recognized states having additional energy. With just utilized guns and other arms to ward off the English, the modification was primarily produced to give individuals the possibility to fight back against a tyrannical federal administration. Interpretations of the Second Amendment Because its confirmation, Americans have been quarreling over the amendment's definition and explanation. One edge interprets the modification to imply it offers for combined privileges, while the opposed thought is that it offers specific privileges. Those who choose the clustered side believe the modification provides each state the right to preserve and teach official militia units that can offer security towards tyrannical federal authorities. They dispute the …show more content…

rules, owning that it breached the Second modification to the U.S. Constitution, which states: “A well-managed militia being essential to the security of a free state, the right of the people to maintain and bear arms will not be infringed.” In the court’s bulk viewpoint, companion Justice Antonin Scalia wrote: “We are informed of the issue of handgun brutality in this nation, and we take extremely the problems lifted by the numerous amici who consider that the ban on handgun possession is a remedy.... But the enshrinement of constitutional liberties fundamentally requires particular policy options off the

Show More
Related

  • The Importance Of The Second Amendment To The United States

    255 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment to the United States gives American citizens the right to own guns. The opinion of the court is that the men (Republican or Democrat) who lead this country should be allowed to protect themselves. The court’s opinion suggests that every citizen has the right to bear arms. We could defend ourselves from others who try to harm us. Here are some reasons why we should be able to own guns.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The 1st Amendment

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first Amendment grants freedom concerning, religion, assembly, expression and the right to petition. These clauses are very satisfactory for the people of America. They cannot be taken away from the government or anyone else. However, if they are misused the government has the right to intrude. This essay will discuss the five clauses in the 1st amendment.

    Read More

  • 13th Amendment Vs Federalism

    181 Words  | 1 Pages

    Since the signing of the United States Constitution, the dividing of powers in the United States has been based on the sharing of powers between the national government and the local governments (state governments in the case of the United States), which became known as Federalism. Amendment II states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment has most recently been interpreted to grant the right of gun ownership to individuals for purposes that include self-defense. At first it was thought to apply only to the Federal government, but through the mechanism of the Fourteenth Amendment, it has been applied to the states as

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

    577 Words  | 3 Pages

    Writing Pre-Assessment The essay goes into detail about the 3 parts of the first amendment, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of speech and of the press, and Freedom of assembly and petition. They are 3 strong parts of the amendment and could be seen as controversial in the eyes of a lot of people. Even though these cause controversy, the first amendment should still hold limitations.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Second Amendment

    181 Words  | 1 Pages

    The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution should be amended not repealed. The problem that we are having in America is people are misusing guns. It seems easy for me to understand that we should set some rules and limitations on what a person has the right to own, carry, and use. Keeping track of intense powered weapons made to kill people isn’t the same thing as getting rid of and banning all weapons and getting rid of the 2nd amendment. Three reasons why the second amendment shouldn’t be repealed is because number one, the 2nd amendment is important to prevent the government from posing a threat.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

    575 Words  | 3 Pages

    The 1st Amendment guarantees the individual the freedom of religion, speech, press, to assemble, and to petition the government. Freedom of speech allows for people to partake in the democratic process by allowing them to speak their beliefs and political ideals. Without the freedom, there couldn’t be a democracy (Ginsberg, 2014). Though there are different forms of speech, some that are protected and some that are not. There are different ways of looking at the 1st Amendment.

    Read More

  • Concealed Carry: Gun Control Cases

    880 Words  | 4 Pages

    INTRODUCTION Guns. It is a topic that the Supreme Court hasn’t dealt with since Heller v. District of Columbia in 2008, and they have not looked poised to take it on anytime soon. However, a new case has found it’s way into the 9th Circuit: Peruta v. San Diego County. Due to the duration of time between Heller and Peruta the courts have been forced to rule on Second Amendment cases without the guidance of the Supreme Court. Peruta is now forcing the courts to begin examining the Second Amendment again and looking into what rights American citizens are given from it.

    Read More

  • Second Amendment Cons

    1912 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Second Amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." –James Madison, The Second Amendment. The founders of our country as well as our constitution believed that without weapons in the form of firearms, there is no freedom from the harsh rulings of a corrupt government. These founders had just been freed from the duty of war from a corrupt and harsh government, without their weapons or the weapons of the people; this country would not be where it is today.

    Read More

  • First Ten Amendments To The United States Constitution

    1094 Words  | 5 Pages

    The second amendment states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”, which means that any u.s citizen who qualifies the standards can store a weapon at his/her house. “The second amendment was adopted in December 15, 1791” which was adopted to guarantee us citizens safety; yet, we can 't feel

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

    949 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first amendment grants protection for American citizens to have freedom of speech. It protects five general areas: speech, religion, press, right to petition the government, and right to assemble. Freedom of the press is a protection that is necessary for journalists, photographers, news corporations and all media. Without the protection, journalists would not be able to uphold their promise to deliver the truth to citizens who do not have the same access to politics, world news and current events the way the journalism industry does. Ultimately, the first amendment grants the press special privileges, but they are not guaranteed all access.

    Read More

  • Firearms Violate The Second Amendment

    1616 Words  | 7 Pages

    Heller.", Oyez). Furthermore, in dealing with the text of the Constitution as well as the history, the court held that “militia” will not be limited to citizens currently in the armed forces but, “…comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense” (Syllabus). The majority felt that due to the period in which the Constitution was penned, to define the Second Amendment as restrictive, and allotting the right to possess firearms to those only serving in the United States military, would be to juxtapose what was expected of the Amendment and enact a state-sponsored power that the Constitution was trying to safeguard the people from ("District of Columbia v. Heller. ", Oyez). Therefore, in correlation to the original and plain meaning of the Second Amendment, the operative clause as Scalia stated, should be interpreted to “…protect an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” (Syllabus).

    Read More

  • Benefits Of The Second Amendment

    477 Words  | 2 Pages

    Last but not least, the famous Second Amendment. Here is what it is about: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. Pro-gun supporters love to cite the Second Amendment as a proof that it is their right to carry guns in order to rise up against a tyrannical government. However, they are only manipulating the original intent of the Second Amendment for their own profit. Back in the days, the United States had no standing federal army because the founders were afraid of a national standing army consolidating power and the states were expected to sustain a state militia in order to contribute to the national defence.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Right To Bear Arms

    1297 Words  | 6 Pages

    In contrast, Opponents believe that arms should have regulations because they cause violence, such as mass shootings and murder. Despite the differences on each side, the second amendment aids in the protection of all individual rights of the people to keep and bear arms for self-defense when necessary. As a result, the definition of the right to bear arms has to be provided. The second amendment is quite a chicanery clause to understand, the first part of the clause states “ a well-regulated militia.” “Well regulated…” was defined in the eighteenth century, as properly but not overly regulated (Roleff 69).

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Second Amendment

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Second Amendment protects the right of people to keep and bear arms. This amendment was a controversial among different people in the government. It was between letting the people keep their weapons or to not let the people keep their weapons. This amendment was important to the framers of the Constitution because it provided the country with a well-regulated militia. The Second Amendment states "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Proposed Solutions For Gun Control

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is the right to bear arms, which gives American citizens a constitutional right to own and purchase guns. It states, "A well-regulated

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

Open Document