ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

706 Words3 Pages

Methods and Violations of the Stanford Prison Experiment

Oliva Jarvis

University of Phoenix

Oliva Jarvis

University of Phoenix

Psych/599: Foundations of Graduate Study in Psychology

Judith Sugg

Monday July 10th, 2023

Methods and violations of the Stanford prison experiment

The Stanford prison experiment showed, in an intriguing way, how quickly people may be swayed by their surroundings when assigned particular tasks. The experiment's most significant effects were on psychology research methodologies and how to safeguard participants in studies involving both human and animal subjects as well as the researchers themselves in the event of violations of the American Psychological Association ethical guidelines.

Stanford Experiment

In 1971 Dr. Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment with the focus to understand human behavior in a particular setting, in this case prison, Mcray (2015). The study’s goal was to figure out how the behavior was affected by the role-playing, labeling, and social expectations over the course of two weeks, (Zimbardo, 2004). The experiment ended just after six days into the experiment due to frightening elevated levels of abuse (Zimbardo, 2004).

Human Behavior

The experiment revealed that human behavior can be influenced by the environment and situations they are in. …show more content…

In the process, the participants were interviewed and tested for personality traits as well. As a result, anyone who had criminal records or abusing narcotics likewise anyone who displayed personality disorders and physical disorders or psychological problems was excluded from the study, (Zimbardo, 20004). At the end, only white middle class males and one Asian American male were selected to participate in the study. Resulting on minimal diversity included in the

Show More
Related

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Psychological Study

    347 Words  | 2 Pages

    Second, The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study that was too inhumane to continue because of the behavior of the prison guards when handed with superiority and the mental breakdowns of the prisoners. E: “Now, you 'll all be given sunglasses and uniforms to give the prisoners a sense of a unified, singular authority… And from this point forward you should never refer to this as a study or experiment again,’’ (Dr. Phil Zimbardo).

    Read More

  • Why Is The Stanford Prison Experiment Bad

    770 Words  | 4 Pages

    Stanford Prison Argumentative Essay Have you ever felt like you have another side to you that is evil? There was an experiment done by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. The experiment's main goal was to find out if humans are really evil by nature, and the results show that everyone can be evil, but something has to cause a reaction in your brain where you have to use this "hidden evil" to survive. The Stanford prison experiment was a very beneficial and cruel experiment, but it was a necessary one at that; it opened our eyes to human nature and to how we adapt in our environment to survive. This experiment had a crucial influence on many people's beliefs that humans are evil by nature.

    Read More

  • Philip Zimbardo: The Lucifer Effect

    1254 Words  | 6 Pages

    Situational effects and personality come into conflict when discussing behavior. Personality is someone’s “usual pattern of behavior, feelings, and thoughts” (Twenge, 2017, p.20). It remains constant throughout different situations, but some situations can be stressful enough to make a person act out of character. The transition between a person’s normal personality and behavior to a more evil, sinister behavior fascinates a man named Philip Zimbardo, who conducted the infamous Zimbardo Prison Experiment, or Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). Zimbardo is an American psychologist at Stanford University and the mastermind behind the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment (The Story).

    Read More

  • What Is The Lucifer Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

    670 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Section 1: Introduction Human research has been going on since before BC. We have always been curious about how our bodies work, so experiments have always taken place. At Stanford University, Dr. Philip Zimbardo oversaw an experiment known as the Stanford Prison Experiment, which involved 24 volunteer male undergraduate students being divided randomly into groups of two as "prisoners" and "guards" in a prison-like simulation. The U.S. Office of Naval funded the experiment to study how the human mind adapts to a new environment, but it ended up being a voyage of psychological shocks. There were horrifying revelations on how "roles" and "power" influence human behavior.

    Read More

  • Police Battalion 101 Case Study

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    They were too afraid of the consequences of what would happen if they failed to obey orders. (Browning 315). The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. The experiment was supposed to last two weeks but ended up only lasting six days because of the way that people abused their power and did not do the morally right thing. In the Stanford prison experiment, the guards were too afraid to go against the guard that was taking charge because he put himself as this role of a higher authority.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Milgram Experiment

    645 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dialectic Essay Carter The Stanford Prison Experiment and the Milgram Experiment are two of the most regarded and controversial social psychology experiments ever performed. Completed in the 20th century, both experiments aimed to investigate the effects of power and authority on human behavior. While the Milgram experiment explored an individual's obedience to an authoritative command, the Stanford experiment focused on the effects of power dynamics in a simulated prison environment. Despite their undeniable contributions to our understanding of human conduct, these experiments have also been heavily criticised for their numerous ethical implications.

    Read More

  • Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment

    599 Words  | 3 Pages

    Zimbardo offered $15 per day for two weeks to take part in the experiment. The experiment was held in the basement of Stanford University Psychology building; they turned it into a mock prison. To begin the experiment Zimbardo interviewed over 70 applicants and done testing on each to eliminate candidates with psychological issues. Only 24 males were chosen to participate in the experiment.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men

    983 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the article of “The Perils of Obedience”, written by Stanley Milgram, the experimenter explains that the experiment is to see how far a person could hurt a victim in a situation where he is ordered to do so. Also, in the article “The Stanford Prison

    Read More

  • How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform

    1676 Words  | 7 Pages

    Two ‘prisoners’ had to be removed early from the experiment and several were emotionally distressed. However, it does show the power of situation on people’s behavior and decision-making. The people chosen for the experiment were regular students. They were assigned to their roles randomly – the prisoners had not done anything ‘wrong’ and the guards had not earned their position of authority.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Essay

    434 Words  | 2 Pages

    I read the Stanford prison experiment, which I thought was good because it shed some light on a critical aspect of human psychology, namely the power of authority. This study was a famous psychological experiment conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. It aimed to investigate the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a guard by randomly assigning 24 male participants to play one of these two roles in a simulated prison environment. However, the study quickly escalated and the guards became abusive towards the prisoners, who began to exhibit signs of extreme stress and psychological distress. The study was stopped after only 6 days, instead of its planned 2-week duration, due to the unethical and harmful behavior that had

    Read More

  • The Lord Of The Flies: Are People Born Good Or Evil?

    898 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the Stanford prison experiment the actual boys who agreed to do the experiment had no idea what it was, they thought it would be a fun idea to help out with an experiment. The only reason why the experiment stopped after only a week was because a women who was one of the people behind it saw the prisoners walking to the bathroom and they had bags on their heads and they were in single file and she got upset. She was upset because they lost the purpose of the experiment and actually turned these boys into

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Abu Ghraib

    1574 Words  | 7 Pages

    This experiment consisted of a roaster of students who were enrolled to either act as guards or inmates in an imaginary prison setting. This was to test the behavior of humans when put in a non-restrictive authority position over someone with lesser power through labeling. This experiment was set to last for two weeks, but by the sixth day, the guards had become so abusive to the ‘inmates’ that Zimbardo was forced to end the experiment early. Some of the fake inmates had to leave the experiment even earlier due to the abuse they received. After the experiment, almost all the students who participated as guards felt guilty about their actions.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review

    1129 Words  | 5 Pages

    Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Can Normal People Behaving Evil?

    858 Words  | 4 Pages

    Normal People Behaving Evil The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment to see if normal people would change their behavior in a role-play as a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was conducted by Dr.Philip Zimbardo in 1973 at Stanford University that caused numerous amount of trauma to prisoners by prison guards in their role-playing position which forced Dr. Zimbardo to officially terminate the experiment six days after it was introduced. Due to the cruel aggressive behaviors from the guards, the experiment led to a question, "Do "normal" people have the capability of behaving badly?" The answer to that question is that most likely an individual who behave normally will have the capability of expressing evil behavior due to the environment that they are surrounded.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

Open Document