ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution

668 Words3 Pages

1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it. For the articles, it needed 9 out of the 13 states to agree to the amendment which rarely happened and because of this the articles were seen as ineffective because of its and the congress’ lack of power over the individual states. The Articles of …show more content…

I think the hardest part of being the first president would be to have the ability to be a good example and try to be impersonal. The president would have to be impersonal because if Washington only did things that benefited him or his fellow wealthy farmers then he would be seen as greedy. The president should be seen as someone understands that “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few” to quote James T. Kirk from Star Trek, which shows the perfect example of a great president. By being a good example, Washington shows what a good outline of a president is, instead of becoming like the British is being too overpowered; he would work with his fellow branches of government and come to an agreement on all decisions that would affect the future of the country. If the president did his best to present new laws and rules that would help the country grow and improve, instead of just helping the wealthy. For example, If George Washington, as the 1st president decided to abolish slavery in every country except Virginia then he would be seen as acting in his own interests and not what’s best for the rest of the country. Being an impersonal president is the hardest part because to act impersonal you would have to do things that go against your own beliefs or needs because it would help everyone, whether or not Washington enjoyed the new

Show More
Related

  • Primary Arguments Against Ratifying The Constitution Pros And Cons

    210 Words  | 1 Pages

    The primary argument against ratifying the constitution by the Anti-Federalists was that they imagined that the administration would be made would be too effective and they would simply be making ready for another government like the one that they had quite recently contended so energetically to free themselves from England. They likewise needed to include a Bill of Rights before endorsing the constitution and not afterward. The Pros are that the report had expressed to give trust against the unfeeling and unlawful demonstration of decision the american colonies. Freedom of development which is under Article IV. This area said the security and interminable associations and organization among the natives of the rose country.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    230 Words  | 1 Pages

    One last thing the constitution has that stopped tyranny rule was making sure the smaller states got a fair vote in congress compared to the bigger states. They had a meeting called the constitutional convention where they proposed two distinct plans. The first was the Virginia plan where they favored large states, and wanted it to be based off of population. The second one was the New jersey plan which favored small states, and gave each state an equal amount of votes. They eventually came up with the great compromise, where they proposed that congress would be composed of the senate, and the house of representatives.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

    238 Words  | 1 Pages

    Federalists believed the Constitution provided just the right mix of power and limitations. The federalists wanted to make sure the central government either had more or less power. The first government of the US was a one-house legislature with no executive. It couldn't raise money, it relied on the states for military power, and was generally seen as ineffective and weak. The US Constitution was written to remedy those weaknesses and provide the US with a better, more representative form of government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation Constitution

    264 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitution came to fruition as an answer for the issues and numerous shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation. Not every person concurred with the Constitution or even the said issues emerging from the Articles of Confederation. These people were called Anti-Federalists and their thoughts would not be as effective as the thoughts of the Federalists, since Anti-Federalist thought's reflected numerous qualities of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution should have been endorsed with a specific end goal to conjure change and solvethe issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists had the plans to make the country the best is could be, and also sufficiently giving rights to citizens.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lora Reed Ontiveros P. Sci 180 01 July, 2017 The Constitutional Convention In February of 1787, Congress decided that a convention should assemble to amend the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention was held by a small body of well-respected delegates in the Assembly Room of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, to inaugurate a new union. This convention ultimately impelled three crucial proposals, the Virginia and New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise, which led to the nation’s fist Constitution.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    196 Words  | 1 Pages

    Before ratifying the Constitution, a constitutional convention was called in 1787 to change the Articles of Confederation. This meant that each state had only one vote in Congress, and the size didn’t matter. The debate was between the federalists and Anti-Federalist, one side wanted to ratify the constitution and the other side didn’t. It was not easy because there were documents and articles both supporting and going against it. Who are the federalists?

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    797 Words  | 4 Pages

    At the time that the Constitutional Convention took place, the North was industrialized and produced many finished goods. The South, however, still had an agricultural economy. Therefore, the South imported many finished goods from Britain. The North wanted the government to be able to impose import tariffs or taxes on finished products. They wanted this to help protect against foreign competition and encourage the South to buy goods made in the North.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    959 Words  | 4 Pages

    he Constitutional Convention was composed of men of strong principal; men with firm opinions and the education to support those views. Their patriotism and analytical prowess fueled the Convention and its countless debates, resulting in months of writing and perfecting the document that serves as our nation’s foundation. The delegates’ intensity caused them to continue haggling over details up until just days before the Constitution was completed. Such was the case on September 14th, 1787, a mere three days before the Constitution was sent off for ratification. Several issues were raised for discussion that day, including that of impeachment, the publication of all the proceedings of the lower house of Congress, and the appointment of a national

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    733 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, all thirteen states did not ratify this new Constitution until March, 1781. Merrill states that, “The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777” (1970). It took many years to convince all the states to ratify because it was controversial document. It was controversial because not everyone believed that a confederation would be able to keep the states together. The Articles of Confederation failed because it created a weak central government, gave too much power to the states, and divided the United States.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

    523 Words  | 3 Pages

    When a car crash occurs it is almost certain that the person behind the wheel is put to blame, and not the vehicle itself, how is it that when a firearm is used good or bad it is the gun that is put to blame and not the person behind the trigger? The second amendment states that we as US citizens are guaranteed the right to a, “well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The first piece allows for citizens to bear arms out of the possibility that the government may need to be kept in check. The second piece that is not as obvious is the need to bear arms out of protection for the life of oneself, those that we care about, our homes, and our liberties. There are many that want more laws to prevent responsible citizens from owning guns.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution are vastly different, yet both exhibit what was scene as essential to the success of the nation when they each were written and enacted. It is no doubt that the Articles of Confederation were weak, otherwise citizens and legislative bodies would still be answering to them. However, the Articles served as the nation’s first constitution during the Revolutionary War, of which the United States was the victor. Therefore, despite the differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, both documents are essential to American history and the progress of this country. At the time of ratification in 1781, and well before that, the Articles of Confederation were established to

    Read More

  • Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    805 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States were both used as a means for forming a functioning government. However, after a few years the new citizens realized that the Articles of Confederation was not government responsibility for the country and that any changes that needed to be made would have to have an agreement amongst all the states. I will describe four the of the changes between the Articles of Confederation and the current Constitution and why those changes were better institutional designs. First, one the major points in the Articles of Confederation was that the federal government could not collect taxes and it was up to the states to collect said taxes based on the relative value of the land in

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Us Constitution

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    Both of these Documents were created with the mind set to provide the foundation for a unified, centralized government. Even though the confederation only lasted from 1781-1789, it was still seen to be valuable with its belief that sovereignty belongs to every state. After the Confederation ended in 1789, the U.S. Constitution took place bringing the states together as a whole. While these two documents have the needs of the nation in mind, they both do have quite a bit of a difference as well.

    Read More

  • Difference Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    1033 Words  | 5 Pages

    The most important difference between these documents was that the Articles of Confederation gave very little power to a central government and the Constitution created a strong central government. The Article of Confederation was written to unite states after the American Revolution. People had the fear of the government having too much power. This document established

    Read More

  • Texas Constitution Pros And Cons

    762 Words  | 4 Pages

    A constitution is the fundamental law by which a nation or a state is governed and organized. It establishes the framework of government, delegates the powers and duties of governmental bodies, and defines the relationship between the government and their citizens. Texas current constitution was adopted in 1876, and since then Texas voters have approved more than 467 amendments to this document. The word “amendment” is defined as the act or process of changing the words or the meaning of a law or document (constitution). Throughout this essay I will explain the rules for amending the Texas Constitution, the attempts made at constitutional reforms during the 1970s, explain why constitutional reforms were attempted and why it ultimately failed.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution

Open Document