Another argument for single sex schools is that boys test scores were generally lower than girls in coed classes. “In march 2010, for example, the center on education policy released a report of 2008 test scores, showing that boys trailed girls in reading in everyone of the more than 40 states where data were available” (Houppert). While this is a valid point, boys would trail girls no matter what the circumstances were. The only difference is the idea that boys in single sex schools would still have the same test scores, just all around the whole board, while girls would have the same test score all around the board. Supporters of single sex schools, also feel that the differences of boys and girls can be beneficial in a single gender setting.
Of the cons of single-sex education listed in a 2013 report by Connecticut’s State Education Resource Center, two of the first listed were the promotion of stereotypes and the undermining of gender equality that came with the separation. As well, it mentioned that this single-sex system doesn’t prepare students for work or family life in the real world, as you cannot afford to only work with one gender. Yes, a lot of supporters agree that this system puts less pressure on female students to strive towards things such as arithmetic as they mature. However, that comment in itself undermines the goal of single-sex education by stating that females can’t succeed in a normal setting, despite how this is falsely proven. It puts kids in a situation where they grow up believing that the other gender is so different that they can’t survive and work together, which can be detrimental after they graduate, where the child will have to deal with men, women, and even those who identify with both or neither.
They argued that boys would be civilized through contact with girls, and would therefore achieve more academically. Dale stressed that the advantage of coeducational schooling for the boys was not at the expense of the girls, who would do equally well academically in either single-sex or co-educational schools. In recent times there has been a generally held perception that girls are better off academically in single sex schools. Some have made claims that this is also true of boys'
Girls and boys learn differently from one another. Different classroom strategies may have different effects on different genders. Competitive lessons may appeal and have more impact towards boys while lessons that incorporate emotion may have more impact or appeal more to girls. Yes, students all learn differently and may benefit more from one than the other, but a majority of students do show improvement in single-gender classes. In fact, a study done over single-sex vs. coed classes showed that 70% of elementary schools showed improvement in math when taking single-sex classes.
Single sex schooling provides the necessary stage for both gender to demonstrate and express themselves without fear nor embarrassment. For example, by comparing girls in single sex classroom and in co-educational classroom, girls are more open and engaging to any sort of class activity given in single sex classroom rather than girls in co-educational classroom. The reason that mask the phenomenon mostly rooted that girls behaves more passively and submissive (Swain and Harvey, 2002) when there’s the presence of male student while girls in all-girls setting tend to be more outspoken, athletic and expressive of their thoughts. Researchers also have observed that girls tend to lose their shyness and have higher self-esteem and confidence to brave any challenges. They become more competitive until they are no longer hold back by the societal standard of being the traditional “feminine” like taking interest in STEM subjects as well.
Can you think of a girl you know who loves sports? How about a boy who is conservative and isn’t rough and ready to “get their hands dirty”? Are single-gender schools going to help those students who don’t fit into the typical stereotype, learn in the best way possible? Or are they going to force them into a stereotype that isn’t who they want to see themselves as? In the 1990s, schools across the nation began researching on whether separating girls and boys were beneficial for their education.
Students will have a more relaxed learning experience without distractions from the opposite gender. Boys and girls can freely express themselves without “fear of embarrassment or feelings of inadequacy [that] may accompany the co-ed classroom experience” (Source #3). In single-sex classrooms, students also do not have to worry about impressing the other gender. For example, many students from both genders place much attention on their physical appearance, sometimes in hopes of impressing the opposite gender. Students can instead focus on their studies and schoolwork in a single-sex educational environment since many of these schools require a school uniform.
would you like to see your child in a single sex school ? single sex schools are a very real thing among us today . people started looking towards single sex schools much more often these days . most probably the parents of the female students try to separate their "purchase baby girls " from violent boys and the parents of the male students try to make them grow up in a more tough environment to make sure he grows a " man " . single sex schools has caused huge controversy between people .
Providing an effective sex health education programs in schools, teenagers will learn about several types’ transmission of STD which helps to spread awareness and motivate them on abstinence until marriage. With improved access to sex education, there are great possibilities in scattering the myths that are interrelated with sex and widens their horizon which aids to mitigate the rate of unintended pregnancies among the teenagers. Another important positive aspect of sex education which was identified is to build strong relationships and empowerment against sexual violence. It has been argued that parents are the most likely to be the appropriate person to impart sex education to their children in the earlier stages at home which will help ease to influence the cognitive development and the perplexity of a child. Finally, the efficacy of sexuality education programs in schools is, undoubtedly since few countries can point a significant improvement after the implementation of this meaningful programme.