1. Describe the study design (is it correlational, experimental, survey research, etc.). The study is Level 3, experimental. The participants are within subject design experiences because since the subjects were divided into two groups by gender.
The 16 participants (11 female, five male; Mage = 21.81, SDage = 2.2, age range: 20-36 years) were undergraduates at the University of California, Los Angeles. They participated as per requirement for their Psychological Research Methods course. All were presumed to have English fluency, normal hearing, and normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Design
Will you be using a between-subjects or within-subjects design? If you have more than one IV, you need to answer this question separately for each IV. I will be using within subjects design. The participants will be given the same treatment during the experiment.
1. Personality- individual differences in characteristic 2. Psychodynamic theories- views that defends personality of conscious and unconscious 3. Psychoanalysis-
Module Project Assignment Katie R. Stout School of Applied Psychology, Liberty University Author Note Katie R. Stout I have no known conflict of interest to disclose. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Katie R. Stout.
Kashfa Ahmed ENGW3308 Musselman Unit 1 Draft 1 APA Format 09/10/2014 Word Count: 1291 Defining psychology has been a dilemma ever since the emergence of this field in the scientific society. Research in psychology follows the scientific method except the manipulation of abstract variables does not always lead to concrete results. There are many things to consider like the variability amongst subjects, internal validity and the inability to generalize results to different populations along with the specific guidelines that must be followed in order to deem the experiment as ethical. Since psychology
Opportunity sampling was used to collect the participants as this provided the quickest and most efficient means of collecting people who fit the required criteria (Non Psychology student, no background in psychology). The mean age of these participants is 19.2 and the standard deviation was 1.7 and there were no gender or ethnic specificities. Materials An image of a woman (appendix 4a)for male participants and an image of a male(Appendix 4b) for female participants (Male image not used due to no female participants) both images were randomly collected from the internet by myself from a non-copyright site. An exam invigilators report was also given for free use in the experiment.
Participants There were 17 undergraduate psychology major students from the University of California, Los Angeles that participated in the experiment. There were 15 females and two males whose ages ranged from 19 to 24 years old (M= 22.35, SD= ). Their education level ranged from sophomore to senior standing. The participants were all enrolled in a psychology research methods class where they received course credit for their participation. GRADER, MUSIC, AND FUNDAMENTAL ATTRIBUTION ERROR 8 Design
Dreams are exquisite phenomenons that can often be analyzed to help you realize new things in the conscious state. The subject for this study is a 15 year old female who is 5’ 6” and weighs approximately 130 lbs. The dreams being analyzed are mostly connected to her daily life recently. Throughout the study, she thought about her dreams and realized that there were subtle symbols that could be compared to events in her daily life. The following paper shows the analysis of three of her 15 dreams from over the course of the week.
Given the broad areas of interest falling under the purview of biological psychology, it will probably come as no surprise that individuals from all sorts of backgrounds are involved in this research, including biologists, medical professionals, physiologists, and chemists. Indeed, Tolman stated, “I believe that everything important in psychology can be investigated in essence through the continued experimental and theoretical analysis of the determiners of rat behavior at a choice-point in a maze.” Behaviorism dominated experimental psychology for several decades, and its influence can still be felt today. Given that any behavior is, at its roots, biological, some areas of psychology take on aspects of a natural science like biology. Reflecting the diversity of the field of psychology itself, members, affiliate members, and associate members span the spectrum from students to doctoral-level psychologists, and come from a variety of places including educational settings, criminal justice, hospitals, the armed forces, and industry.
Experimenters led by Solomon Asch asked students to participate in a "vision test. " In reality, all but one of the participants was the shill of the experimenter, and the study was really about how the remaining student would react to the confederates' behavior. The participants (the real subjects and the confederates) were all seated in a classroom where they were told to announce their judgment of the length of several lines drawn on a series of displays. They were asked which line was longer than the other, which were the same length, etc.
They watched to see what they did. The design is of type: a) Observational · B) Correlational c) Experimental 3. In an experiment a list of 30 positive and 20 negative adjectives (with self-referential processing?) Occur in patients with subclinical
There were two groups in this experiment, the teachers and students. All of the volunteers to the experiments were the teachers and they had some actors play the students. The idea was to punish the students for their wrong answer through a shock treatment (http://nature.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7article/article35.htm 1). Throughout the experiment, they began to realize that the “test subjects”
Each participate was picked at random and paid $4.50 for participation; upon arrival, the test subjects participated in a fixed draw to determine if they would be the teacher or the learner. The learner (actor) was strapped to a chair in an opposing room while the teachers (test subjects) were seated in front of a shock generator that ranged from 15 volts to 450 volts. The teacher would then ask the learner a series of questions, each question answered incorrectly would receive a shock administered by the teacher and would increase with each inaccurate answer. To insert authority, a man in a lab coat remained with the teacher and prompted him to continue at signs of uncertainty when the learner vocalized discomfort (previously recorded) and/or asked for the study to end. The results were riveting, all participants continued to 300 volts, while 65% of the participants reached the full amount of 450 volts; enough to kill the learner.