Introduction Recently it has become more evident that people with lower intelligence may have a higher risk of developing a mental illness. Research has shown that children and adolescents who score lower on psychometric tests of intelligence are at a greater risk of having contact with psychiatric services and being admitted to the hospital for psychiatric care (Gale, Hatch, Batty & Deary, 2009). Several different psychiatric diagnoses have been looked at in this context, such as schizophrenia (Gunnell, Harrison, Rasmussen, Fouskakis, &Tynelius, 2002), depression, bipolar disorder and other non-affective psychoses (Zammit, et al., 2004). Cognitive epidemiology research has looked at childhood IQ as predictors for health later in life, …show more content…
A majority of research is contradictory when it comes to high intelligence in psychopathy. Some research argues that higher intelligence is correlated with more offending, while others argue that a higher IQ in psychopathy means that they can live a successful life in the community. A majority of the research in this area has only looked at IQ scores in children and adults as it is related to offending and psychopathy, but has not looked specifically at how childhood IQ is associated with psychopathy in adults. This research will aim to fill in gaps about how childhood intelligence associates with being a non-offending …show more content…
The PCL-SV is a 12-item version of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Each of the items are scored on a 3-point scale, where total scores can range from 0 to 24 (Hare & Neumann, 2006). This version of the PCL-R was chosen because the PCL-SV can be used as a screen for psychopathy as a stand-alone measure in non-criminal populations (Hare & Neumann, 2006). Using the early data that was collected on IQ from the LBC1936, will allow the comparison of the participants’ childhood IQ and their results on the PCL-SV, in order to determine if there is any relationship between the two
Theories such as, Inherited Criminality, Appearance, and even theories regarding the poor development of key areas of the Central Nervous System (CNS), could all be factors. But what really stands out, is how these biological factors may have interacted within the environment in which these children grew up (Bernard, 2016). Most of the children featured in the documentary were abused, delinquent, and often used drugs and alcohol. Any undetermined biological or physical factor as identified by the biological theories of crime, could very well have played a role when factored into the environmental conditions that the child was growing up
Contemporary approaches to psychopathy and sociopathic behavior have focused on biological and genetic causes (Kennedy, 1991). This can lead a person to have a mental breakdown and act unexpectedly in criminal behaviors that are life threatening to the ones around
Countless factors can influence individuals to commit acts of crime such as murder. According to Morton and cook social factors hold the most influence especially when it comes to youthful offenders. Social factors include substance and alcohol abuse, disorganized and abusive families, minority background, poverty and violent communities with lack of support, and poor educational achievements. Many famous serial killers had bad childhoods and showed signs of psychopathic behaviors. Also, the McDonald triad also explains that children who wet their beds, committed acts of arson, and animal abuse was psychopathic and they would be more likely to kill (Simon,2015).
Agnew organizes the base for crime into domains beginning with self –control and irritability. A person that demonstrates intense emotional reactions, lack motivation and blames others for their problems can lead to both reduced constraints against crime and an enhanced motivation for the crime. Another domain relates to poor parenting, which leads negative bonding in a person’s social and personal life. This behavior is also a major trigger for lack of informal control and seeking rewards for negative behaviors. Lack of parenting practices can indirectly lead to bad relationships with other family
The meta-analysis of 43 imaging studies carried out by Yang and Raine, found that reduced structure and function of regions of the prefrontal cortex, including the right OFC, right ACC and left DLPFC, is linked to increased antisocial behaviour. This leads researchers, to conclude that prefrontal impairments play a significant role in antisocial populations, highlighting the significance of a functional prefrontal
Adrian Raine, criminologist and author of "The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime," has said before, is a very important factor in criminal behaviour that affects about 75% of a person’s criminal activity. In his book, Raine explores the many evidences that lead up to biological and genetic influences on crime
This theory clearly rules out the effect of inherited or innate factors, and the last is the cognitive theory, which is based on how the perception of an individual is manifested into affecting his or her potential and capability to commit a crime. (Psychological theories of crime) Relating these theories to the case under study, it’s clear that the behaviour can be traced most times to faulty relationships in the family during the first years of
Introduction This essay will briefly look at the background of psychopathy including various psychopathy evaluation tools. It will then move on to the supporting evidence behind both genetic / biological factors before looking at the modern portrayal of the psychopath and environmental cause before deciding which, if either is solely responsible. There are several different definitions of psychopathy. Hare, (2002) describes Psychopathy as a serious personality disorder associated with a particularly severe and violent pattern of antisocial behaviour.
Gretton et al., stated that high PCL-R scores predicted the chances of juvenile sex offenders to reoffend in general offences, violent offences, and sexual offences to a fairly high degree. In a similar study conducted by Viljoen, McLachlan, and Vincent (2010), the Hare Psychopathic Checklist: Youth Version (PCL-YV), was also determined to be helpful in assessing the likelihood of reoffending in juveniles and adolescents, but due to ethical concerns, testers should refrain from labeling juveniles as psychopaths if this assessment is administered. Clinicians however, regularly use the PCL-YV as a tool in assessing juvenile risk. It was also determined that clinicians nearly always used a risk assessment for any type of evaluation related to the disposition, sex offender registration, rehabilitation, and transfer of juveniles to criminal court (Viljoen, McLachlan, & Vincent,
Over the last century, scientific improvements have allowed humans to research further into biology and neuroscience than ever before. Biological processes have been found to be heritable; some of which may act as markers for certain types of behavior (Oritz & Raine, 2004). Extensive research has been conducted into which biological factors could cause antisocial behavior, including increased height, low serotonin levels, and low cortisol (Oritz & Raine, 2004). Biological markers of antisocial behavior such as these give insight into how genetics may play a role in predisposing children to conduct disorder (Oritz & Raine, 2004). Specifically, the autonomic measure lower resting heart rate may be one of the most important markers of antisocial
How do the various psychological and psychiatric approaches presented in this chapter differ from one another? Psychological theories of criminal behavior differ from other theories like social structure theories of crime in the sense that psychological theories of crime place the emphasis on the individual and their cognitive abilities as opposed to social institutions and larger groups. Nearly all psychological theories of crime focus entirely on an individual and their cognition as the explanation of crime as opposed to social processes and social life. Psychological and psychiatric approaches to deviant, criminal, and antisocial behaviors differ in the sense that psychiatric approaches tend to focus on treating the symptoms of antisocial behavior through varying means. Psychological approaches on the other hand tend to focus on determining the causes of crime from within and individual.
(Sieb, 2013, p. 124). According to a study done by Kumari, et al. (2014), “violent, mentally disordered individuals with antisocial personality
Furthermore, the psychology of criminal behavior, psychology, and criminology all have a primary objective of achieving an understanding of the variation in the criminal behavior of individuals (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). Empirically, the study of variation in criminal behavior is done by the studying of covariates (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). The primary covariates that PCC studies are biological, social, and psychological (Andrews and Bonta , 2010). Although, criminology tends to assess criminality at an aggregate level, in comparison to the psychology of criminal conduct’s focus on an individual level. Additionally, a psychology of criminal conduct involves applying what is learned by the studying of psychological information and methods to the predicting and influencing the propensity of criminal behavior on an individual
According to Siegel (2015), trait theory is the view that criminality is a product of abnormal biological or psychological traits which can be subdivided into two major categories: those that stress biological makeup and those that stress psychological functioning (p. 109). Biological trait theories includes four different conditions: biochemical, neurophysiological, genetic, and evolutionary. Biochemical factors will include diet, hypoglycemia, hormonal influences, premenstrual syndrome, lead exposure, and environmental contaminants. Neurophysiological factors will include brain structure, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, brain chemistry, and arousal theory. Genetic causes could stem from parental deviance, adoption studies, and
This critique will be reviewing the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). The WISC-IV was authored by David Weschler and was published by PsychCorp, which is a brand of Harcourt Assessment Inc in 2003 (Plake, 2005). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Fourth Generation can take anywhere from 65-80 minutes to administer and should be done individually (Plake, 2005). In The Sixteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook Plake (2005) states, an individual administering the WISC-IV should allow for an additional 10-15 minutes if using supplemental tests.