First comes compliance, in which a person parallels to others’ behavior in public while privately disagreeing with the change. Second falls internalization, where a person actually accepts the changes into their own beliefs. Then comes identification, in which a person imitates the behavior of a job or image. Lastly falls “ingrational” conformity, used to please others. The reasons behind conformity fall into two categories: normative and informational.
REPORT OF 16PF TEST "Personality is the dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his characteristic behavior and thought” (Allport, 1961). There are various theories which talks about personality. It includes psychoanalytic, trait, learning, biological and evolutionary, and humanistic theories, etc. Psychoanalytic theories of personality originated with the seminal work of Sigmund Freud. According to his tripartite theory of mind, behavior is the dynamic outcome of the struggle between id, ego and superego.
First there is Compliance, in this instance the individual is conforming externally in public or while with friends, but privately disagrees. Translating to: a person changes their view, but it is a temporary change. Next there is Internalisation, here a person changes their external opinion to fit in with a group which leads to the individual changing their own internal opinion. Internalisation is one of the deepest levels of conformity. Finally is
In order to raise our self-esteem, the group members will tend to favor their group against other groups. Many things do occur during this process of comparison between an in-group and an out-group; the group members do tend to maximize the differences between their group and other groups. At the same time, they will minimize the differences that might exist between the group members in order to build a bond between them. While doing all these, the group’s members will be more aligned to positive things in the in-group and tend to remember more negative information on the out group (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Various aspects of Social Identity Theory do exist; the interpersonal-intergroup scope.
What this really means is that we tend to deceive ourselves by ways of thinking called self-serving biases. Self-serving biases are thought strategies that allow people to spare themselves from the blame of anything that goes wrong so that they can continue to see themselves in a positive way. For example, one very common self-serving bias is when people do well at something, they automatically assume that they did well because of their own talents and skill and they are happy to take the credit personally. However, if they do something that does not turn out well, they automatically attribute the failure or bad result to some exterior circumstance or other reason other than themselves for why they did poorly. When this is explained so clearly is sounds kind of silly and almost childish, but I was surprised to realize how often I do this (usually without even noticing it), and how most people I know do the same thing.
Whiting uses some empirical psychological reasons to demonstrate Aristotle’s point of treating friend in a way of “how we in fact are” instead of “how we ought to be.” One is the idea of the “ethical selection”, in which people maintain their positive self-image by doing things that are morally true but not how valuable they are. Whiting mentions when people face a dissonance in their cognition, like when their belief is not consistent with their behavior, they would either change their behavior or opinion to avoid this dissonance. Therefore, there may be inevitable factors which play a role on how we treat our friend and how we think we should treat them, leading to a somewhat self-deception in a way of deceiving ourselves and our friends
When we define something it is because we want to understand it. We want to understand it because our knowledge of it is unacceptable. We aren't satisfied with what we know, but we learn to accept either the offered definition or the lack thereof. To accept something is to tolerate it, tolerance is the allowance of an occurrence of something one does not necessarily agree with yet does not interfere with. By tolerating something we allow uncertainty, uncertainty leads us down a journey of self-discovery, on this journey we learn to either accept uncertainty or define the term for ourselves in a most meaningful way.
Offensive False Love Approach In this approach, the person in question may have different behaviours in front of others than they do when they are alone with the partner; yet they may expect one to understand and accept them regardless. Both individuals may love each other unconditionally regardless of their actions and consider their relationship their priority. Both may think that anything the other does is correct and respectable. They may not see that they have bad habits or faults. Both individuals may hide their anger, bad manners, rudeness, and tendency to gossip from their partner.
People then want their ‘Face’ to be protected from defamation which is called ‘Face Wants’. There are 2 types of ‘Face Wants’ that are used when attempting to respect and save another person’s ‘Face’. The first is ‘Negative Face’, which is a persons want to be unimpeded by and independent from others. The second is ‘Positive Face’, which Meyerhoff (2006) describes as the want to be accepted and to be seen as desirable by at least some members of the
This response to official authority is realized in a variety of instances, for instance within the loved ones, school and office. 2) Describe how our behavior is affected by the presence of others. Experiments on social facilitation reveal that the presence of observers can arouse individuals, strengthening the most likely response and so boosting their performance on easy or well-learned tasks but hindering it on difficult or newly learned ones. When people pool their efforts toward a group goal, social loafing may occur as individuals exert less effort. When a group experience arouses people and makes them anonymous, they become less self-aware and self-restrained, a psychological state known as deindividuation.