Another example of verbal irony is when Montresor toasts Fortunato 's long life but not in the implication that Fortunato means, “I drink”, he said, “to the buried that response around us.” “And I to your long life” (pg 868). This is really ironic because we know that Montresor is going to kill Fortunato. This further puts the reader into reading this story suspensefully because of the dark and ominous tone that Poe sets out by using both verbal and dramatic irony in his
Expository Essay Irony can clearly be stated as the use of words that mean the opposite of what we think it means. An example of a story that uses irony is The Cask of Amontillado. Which is about a man named Montresor who believes this other man named Fortunato insulted him. Montresor’s family motto is “no one insults me with impunity”, he feels justified in taking revenge on Fortunato. In the short story by Edgar Allen Poe, there are countless examples of irony to convey Montresor’s unlawful act, while applying an additional layer of irony to sabotage his revenge.
For those considering murder to satisfy personal needs, theres always alternatives. In “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe, Montresor, a sensitive but evil man, wanted to seek revenge by appearing concerned of the wellbeing of his victim [Fortunato] to later murder him for his own selfish reasons, “…but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge” (Poe 144). Fortunato, a jester and prideful man, fell into Montresors’ trap by not wanting Luchesi, what seems to be Fortunatos’ rival, to be the one to taste the Amontillado. Montresor takes Fortunado into the catacombs of the Montresor family in search for the Amontillado, he chains him and starts building a wall to burry him alive. Unlike many, each homicide story is unique to provide a thrilling sensation.
First, Dumas explores revenge in his novel. In the novel, Edmond seeks revenge after he is wrongfully imprisoned. We see the novel has several thoughts on revenge. Towards the beginning of the novel revenge is seen as good way to settle anger. 'As long as I 'm aware of your treachery and make you understand that I want to avenge it, I 'm reasonable enough ' (371).
Revenge, it drives people to impossible lengths, a few to madness, and others to the grave. It is quite frankly impractical to try and do to others as they have done to you. One can never truly gain anything out of dishing cold hard revenge, you may feel satisfied or even perhaps a tad bit delighted after you've done wrong to the person who's done wrong to you, consequently in what reality are you accomplishing? Knowing that that person is suffering as you once did? Or the other lives you may have affected due to your anger towards that one person.
In “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Poe the narrator feels the need to justify his reasoning for being bothered by the old man’s eye. He knows this is wrong, but in his mind if he justifies it and actually makes sense then it is okay. “Whenever it fell upon on me, my blood ran cold, and so by degrees, very gradually, I made up my mind to take the life of the old man, and this rid myself of the eye forever.” Poe. This sounds very devious and selfish right? The man knows this and feels bad for not liking the man’s eye, but believes his reason makes it okay.
The first example of Fortunato’s foolishness is his decision to accompany Montresor to the catacombs; it is quite foolish for him to impose, because the nitre within the catacombs could affect his already questionable health. He continues this foolish behavior even after Montresor implores him to leave, and again loses his opportunity to escape death. Finally, his madness is seen in his “distorted perceptions and beliefs”. After being captured, Fortunato shows signs of a distorted perception, and seems to believe his imprisonment is only “an excellent jest” (Poe 240). This however is not the case, and he is unable to fully rationalize the situation he is in.
A short story used to study paranoia and the tragedy of mental deterioration, Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Tell Tale Heart” illuminates the psychological contradictions that contribute to the narrator’s murderous profile. In the early moments of the piece, the narrator adamantly claims that he is not insane; however, his blood lust and obsession with the old man’s eye convince the reader otherwise. To this point, the reader might wonder what sane human being would dismember a helpless, elderly man. In fact, many readers may deem the narrator a sociopath, a man incapable of taking moral responsibility for his crimes. However, the narrator’s obvious guilt in the end of the piece proves the extremity of this accusation.
Lastly, it was the irrational decision of Dr. Roylott that caused his death, arguably more than Sherlock Holmes’ cane did. Therefore, the detective could not possibly experience guilt do the passing of Dr. Roylott, an enemy of his. It is evident Sherlock Holmes felt no guilt regarding the death of Dr. Roylott, purely due to the fact that the detective loathed him severely. Various sections of textual evidence present Dr. Roylott’s cruel character to establish this animosity between the two men. This was first introduced in the
He was once thought to be virtuous, but because of his immoral actions he is not. Having some negative qualities such as poor judgement and being to confiding in other people, was enough to bring him to his demise. Brutus took on the role of the tragic hero and as the tragic hero, he was it was his downfall. As William Shakespeare once wrote in Hamlet, “To thine own self be true, and it must follow, as the night the day thou canst not then be false to any