2.0 INTRODUCTION
This section reviews the relevant theories, methodologies and empirical findings in literatures on the impact of public debt on economic growth. There are several theories in the study of public debt and economic growth. Each theory has its strength and weaknesses with different conceptual, theoretical and empirical assumptions.
2.1 Theoretical Review
2.1.1 The Dependency Theory It was propounded by Raul Prebisch in 1950`s. Preblish and his friends developed dependency theory as an attempt to understand why some countries in the world remained underdeveloped. Preblish found that increases in the wealth of the rich nations appeared to be at the expense of the poorer ones. Dependency theory is a notion that resources flow from a periphery of poor and underdeveloped states of the former. The theory arose as a reaction to
…show more content…
Nations, which are wealthy, vigorously maintain a state of dependence by various means. This influence may be multifaceted, involving economics, media control, politics, banking and Finance, education, culture, sport, and all aspects of human resource development (including recruitment and training of workers).
3. Wealthy nations actively contradict attempts by dependent nations to resist their influence by means of economic sanctions and/or the use of military force.
Strengths of the theory.
1. Theory analyses the inequality existing between the poor and rich countries.
2. The theory breaks some political bonds and explains reasons why the wealthy nations are taking advantage of the poor countries.
3. The theory dismisses the neoclassical theory’s which claims that the existing global inequality is caused by the country laziness, instead it argues in favour of the underdeveloped countries.
Weakness of the theory.
1. Theory does not explain other factors that lead to under development other than the role played by the wealthy nation.
2. The theory was based on un- realistic perception and miss interpreted the Marxist
The theory displays the idea that society isn’t an issue of race but more of the upper class having more power in ppolitics. Therefore, this theory has been used to imply that race doesn’t have a bearing on class. This is a false taking even though some blacks, Latinos, Southeast Asians have moved up to higher economic classes. In the class conflict theory, the dominant ruling class oppresses the lower class but it is all determined on class not race. Therefore, this model asserts that the capitalist should encourage racism.
Marxist theory aimed to examine capitalism's trends, workers' liberation, and the potential for revolution through class
The reader has to understand that when Marxist ideas are discussed in literature, it has a different meaning to what ideas are represented when Marxism is discussed with politics or economics. Marxist
The Marxist (Socio-Economic) Lens is based on the theories of philosophers & economists, Karl Marx & Friedrich Engles. It says that a society is made up of a set of concepts, beliefs, values, & ways of thinking that are influenced by that society’s economic & class structures. Critical lenses serve to showcase another person’s perspective & background in life. By using & understanding lenses, we can come to understand where someone else is coming from & better meet in the middle in discussions & debates. Even if we don’t agree with the other person’s perspective or ideas, we have a better understanding of them which reduces misinformation & encourages disagreements to be talked out civilly.
This then leads to Marxist which to inequalities in the workplace and coordinated with Non-Marxist which alienates women to feel powerless and meanness in the atmosphere of the workplace. 2. Sociological imagination refers to the
1. Introduction Income inequality has grown significantly during this past decades and this phenomenon continues to increase over the years. This problem is constantly discussed in the daily news all around the world. Several consequences of this increase of inequality between people leads to economic problems such as high unemployment rates, lack of work for young people, fall of demand for certain product. The gap between rich and poor is increasing, the rich are richer and the poor are poorer as a result politicians and economists try to adopt certain policies in order to reduce this gap.
Ayiti is a Caribbean country located on the western one-third of the island of Hispaniola. Haiti's land is mostly rough and mountainous. The capital of Haiti is Port-au-Prince. Ayiti is divided in 10 departments. The Haitian government has 3 Branches of government.
America prides itself on being one of the most effective democratically governed counties. The idea of the American dream is that all people have equivalent political freedoms and a responsive government. However the effectiveness of social equality is being threatened by increasing inequality in the United States. Economic inequality in the US has expanded drastically. The wealth gap has had drastic changes over the past 35 years.
This theory is based on the principles that the value of man is based on the forced job or potential job; economy as a factor that determines the action of society; the struggle of social classes are the construct of its history; it is also taken into consideration the proletariat and the bourgeois, among others. Marxism is the sign of the struggle for a balance between the oppressed and the upper class to create a better world for
In “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” (1974), Hardin debates whether rich countries should provide aid to poor countries through food supplies or immigration. Garrett Hardin was a renowned Americans philosopher received his PhD in microbiology from Stanford University. He has written several books and articles that mainly focus on ecology, and throughout his life, has constantly forewarned the world about the risks of overpopulation. Due to his deep understanding of ecology, and due to the intensive research the author has done on this particular topic, Hardin is credible to write an article about this topic. Moreover, Hardin’s main purpose in writing this piece is to persuade the readers, the population of the rich countries and their governments, not to help the poorer countries.
Defined, poverty means someone who lacks the socially acceptable amount of money to survive. Poverty often leads to a cycle of not being able to afford what is needed across generations. The US has about 12.7% of its population below the poverty line and the rate has been decreasing. The two perspectives that look at this topic in both a positive and negative light are the structural functionalist and the conflict theory. The structural functionalist theory believes everything is a working part of society and is needed to create a sort of well oiled machine and that every part has its own use and needed function.
Inefficient policies all around the world and especially in our country are contributing to problems in the society. And the biggest problem which the world faces today is the problem of “Poverty” and “Inequality”. It is hard for one to determine whether poverty causes inequality or is it the other way around because both these problems are interrelated. Poverty is something which is caused due to transferring wealth in to the hands of a specific group and the unjust policies of the government. And inequality is discriminating a person in all spheres of life which gives a rise to sense of deprivation.
He contends that underdevelopment is generated by the same historical process that generated development. Underdevelopment is a result of country’s participation in the same capitalist system. Frank thus rejects the notion that underdevelopment is traditional or original. He challenges the notion that underdevelopment follows a linear path. He rather argues that ‘’underdevelopment is in large part the historical product of past and continuing economic and other relations...”
Economic globalization refers to the free movement of goods, capital, services, technology and information around the world. Since the 1990s, due to the improvement of advanced communication technologies and the rapid expansion of multinational corporations, economic globalization has become an important trend of the world economic development. This trend not only provides a broader space for international markets for all countries, but also aggravates the competition among countries for market and resources. Economic globalization is an inevitable result of the development that no country can evade. In this paper, we will discuss that economic globalization is beneficial or not to developing countries.
Equality, like fairness, is an important value in most societies. Irrespective of ideology, culture, and religion, people care about inequality. Widening inequality also has significant implications for growth and macroeconomic stability, it can concentrate political and decision making power in the hands of a few, lead to a suboptimal use of human resources, cause investment-reducing political and economic instability, and raise crisis risk. The economic and social fallout from the global financial crisis and the resultant headwinds to global growth and employment have heightened the attention to rising income inequality.