Public Opinion In Inherit The Wind
The public can influence a judge's ruling before ultimately backtracking. There have been many times where people can influence the result of a court case. Throughout time, it has been shown the court of law will have more impact than the court of public opinion. However, as shown through Inherit the Wind and modern day events, the court of public opinion could still influence the final say. The court of law has more impact on the outcome of court cases because they have more power over the public. This can be seen in Inherit the Wind when the jury has found Cates guilty and the public had no influence on the outcome. “The jury’s decision is unanimous. Bertram Cates is found guilty as charged,” (Lawrence and Lee 113). This shows how even …show more content…
This can be shown in Inherit the Wind, when Brady is giving his speech after Cates is found guilty and Brady starts to notice that the audience is not paying attention to him and have lost interest. “‘And here, here in this courtroom, we have seen vindicated’ — a few people leave. He watches them desperately, out of the corner of his eye,” (Lawrence and Lee 119). This scene shows how Brady becomes embarrassed that no one is listening to him and public opinion influences the outcome of the trial. At the end of this trial Brady can not handle the rejection and discomfort the audience shows him and he ends up fainting and eventually dying. This scene shows that though the court of law sees Cates as guilty, publicly influenced Brady’s thoughts and showed him his final position. Public opinion influencing the court of law can also be seen in the real world in the 2006 Duke Lacrosse case. The 2006 Duke Lacrosse case was when three Duke Lacrosse players were arrested for a false report of them sexually assaulting another student at a party. They offered to let them take their DNA and take lie detector tests, and they took their DNA but denied them taking a lie detector test. They also had photo proof that the accuser was already injured before coming to the party. Even though their DNA did not match up with the evidence the police had, the prosecutor was being biased and arrested them anyway. In an article written by Ciesielka, he says
Donald Smith Murder Essay
240 Words | 1 PagesThey found his DNA from a cigarette butt that they found. The murderer was 51 years old and he has a twin brother that he blamed it on. One thing i don't understand is how they blamed it on him when his brother could have been on the property to, just because the cigarette butt had his DNA on it they blame it on him. This case is really important because a man murdered an innocent teacher.
Compare And Contrast Boblit And Brady
1244 Words | 5 PagesAnother argument could have been the fact that the other defendant’s sister was in close relation to Brady which clouded his judgement to make the right descion. If circumstances were different and the prosecution never withheld evidence from the defense the “Brady Rule” would have never been established. Following the proceedings of Brady vs. Maryland the rule was created compelling the prosecution to turn over any evidence to the defense if they require it. So therefore, if the court would have ruled in favor of Brady’s ruling there could have been a chance that Brady’s circumstances would have turned out to be in his favor. Although when Brady took part in the criminal acts with Boblit he must have known there would have been negative consequences for his part in the robbery and murder of Brooks.
Bias In The Oj Simpson Case
1484 Words | 6 Pages(p. 371) This exemplifies how people on the jury wanted to believe in Simpson’s innocence and how the defense purposefully created the jury to their advantage by utilizing the bias present within the public. Regardless of claims and assumptions in opposition, one can easily see how bias for O.J.’s innocence heavily impacted the
Compare And Contrast Randy And Henry Carne Brady
1164 Words | 5 PagesAs they talk at the end of the trial they say that they will never pay the fine as they will go and get it appealed. At the End of the play Drummond slams darwin's theory and the bible together to make it so that people can understand that people can believe in either one. Cates has just won the trial but for Brady it has been a downfall he went into the courtroom thinking he was going to win but Drummond turned it around and made Brady look like a fool in front of the world and Hillsboro. Bradys side of things is completely
Racial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesOn the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.
Children's False Hatred In The Crucible By Arthur Miller
1139 Words | 5 PagesFirst of all, the court was influenced by outside factors.
Jury System Dbq
842 Words | 4 PagesThe jury system has cases where jurors are influenced by the media because it is almost impossible to find someone who has not heard about the case and formed a personal opinion already (Doc F). In widely known cases, jurors may have been influenced by outsiders and the media indirectly and directly. For example, in the People vs. O.J. Simpson case, the infamous decision might have been made because of the jurors discussing the case with people who they are not suppose to discuss it with. An argument can be made that jurors are specifically instructed not to discuss the case or read anything about it, but there is no way to verify that the jurors are actually following this rule. Jurors can also have personal bias because they are very different from the defendant or prosecution (Doc E).
Analysis Of Bert Cates Inherit The Wind
749 Words | 3 PagesVery slowly, he seems to be leaning toward the audience. Then, like a figure in a waxworks, toppling from its pedestal, he falls stiffly, face forward. Meeker and Davenport spring forward, catch Brady by the shoulders and break his fall.” (Lawrence and Lee 120). Meeker, Davenport, the judge, Drummond, and Mrs Brady are the only people who cared.
Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'
710 Words | 3 PagesAlex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.
Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men
1458 Words | 6 PagesThis movie is the best example of minority influence where in the earlier stage only one juror no. 8 says defendant is not guilty but in the end of the movie we see that he is able to influence all the jurors in a very logical manner which I am going to point out later so that all the jurors lastly says the defendant is not guilty. Minority influence is more likely to occur if the point of view of the minority is consistent, flexible, and appealing to the majority. The juror no. 8 doesn’t know defendant is guilty or not guilty but he has only doubt in his mind which he trying to clear during the entire film and with which he also able to clear the views of other
Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesThis is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All
Green River Killer Task Force
930 Words | 4 PagesThey were still going through the evidence, seeing if they could see something that they didn’t see before. They were looking for anything that would help break this case. They had a lot of pressure on them; people wanted this guy in jail and off the streets forever. In November of 2001 the break they were waiting for came. The cold case detective re-tested the biological evidence, and at that moment, they knew who they have been looking for, for so many
12 Angry Men Case Study
858 Words | 4 PagesIn a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence
Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men
721 Words | 3 PagesThis theory is practicable inside of the juror’s decisional processes of the “Twelve Angry Men.” Conformity is described from the beginnings of the film. When the jurors cast their initial vote, doubt is clear in many of the jurors whom vote guilty. This inhibition might be commented as weak belief shaked by the guilty majority’s influence. Additionally, though the movie is not provide any references about the timelines of decision this is a relevant factor presumably affecting the “Twelve Angry Men,” and should be considered as a potential element in creating social
More about Public Opinion In Inherit The Wind
Donald Smith Murder Essay
240 Words | 1 PagesCompare And Contrast Boblit And Brady
1244 Words | 5 PagesBias In The Oj Simpson Case
1484 Words | 6 PagesCompare And Contrast Randy And Henry Carne Brady
1164 Words | 5 PagesRacial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesWhy Is Plessy V. Ferguson Important
665 Words | 3 PagesChildren's False Hatred In The Crucible By Arthur Miller
1139 Words | 5 PagesJury System Dbq
842 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Bert Cates Inherit The Wind
749 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'
710 Words | 3 PagesMinority Influence In 12 Angry Men
1458 Words | 6 PagesReasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesGreen River Killer Task Force
930 Words | 4 Pages12 Angry Men Case Study
858 Words | 4 PagesSocial Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men
721 Words | 3 Pages