Collective rights are unique rights that are given to minorities in Canada and are part of Canada's constitution. The purpose of collective rights is to protect the collective identities of certain groups. These groups include Aboriginal people as well as Francophones and Anglophones. Citizen one is in favor of collective rights for minorities. He believes that the government should preserve collective rights for Anglophones, Francophones as well as Aboriginal people. This is because they were the original people of Canada and so they deserve to retain their cultural identity and not be assimilated. They also have a right to be educated in their language of choice which will help preserve their culture. Aboriginal people also have unique
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is located in the first part of the Canadian Constitution and came into effect on April 17, 1982. The Charter is a document that outlines a set of constitutional principles that assist in creating a free and democratic country and is the most important of the laws in Canada. Some of the laws include: Fundamental freedoms (e.g. freedom of expression); democratic rights (e.g. the right to vote); mobility rights (e.g. the right to live wherever one choses in Canada); legal rights (e.g. the right to life and security); equality rights; language rights; minority-language educational rights and aboriginal and treaty rights. These laws guarantee the basic values of fairness, respect and tolerance for every
MacDonald’s treatment of Aboriginals hurt the growth of Canada and set a standard of maltreatment toward Aboriginals that is continued today. While he was labelled as a friend and admired by Aboriginals, MacDonald’s actions reveal his true feelings and demonstrate his lack of regard for their wellbeing and rights. One can see that his mistreatment extends not just to those in Canada, but also those who are emigrating from other countries and regions, such as Asia. MacDonald was especially racist toward Asians, creating legislation that excluded the Chinese and Mongolian, marking them to be unfit for political office and representation. He felt that this exclusion was necessary to establish European dominance across Canada and
This issue arose because Métis people were involved in negotiating the Métis Settlement Act, and even they themselves do not have an easy, go-to definition of who is Métis. If this model were to be expanded for the creation of a national Métis government, this issue would have to be addressed before such issues confuse everyone even more. It may be the idealist in mine, but agreeing to the terms set out in Alberta’s Métis Settlement Act just to gain the practical benefits seems like the wrong move to
Justin Trudeau and the Liberal party is determined to creating more opportunity for the indigenous people, and allowing their voices to be heard more throughout Ottawa. Working towards this, the Liberal party will abolish all changes that deter the indigenous people from exercising their voting rights and to ensure that the indigenous people can freely practice their rights. In addition, the Liberal party will guarantee that the Kelowna Accord agreements will be embraced, along with the spirit of reconciliation which drove the agreements. Cognizant of the fact that there is a massive increase in population and inflammation in the First Nation community, the Liberal party will immediately increase the two percent cap on funding the First Nations, creating a community with a sufficient funding. Furthermore, owing to the underfunding of First Nation education system, many First Nation students are being held back in comparison with their provincial peers.
The list of rights included that the Metis should have the same rights as any other Canadian, the protection of their traditions, and equality of the English and
has title to the land owing to the fact that the Canada did not own the land in the first place and how Canada forgets about the land and the people on it. British Columbia has a history of Aboriginal political struggle. It began in the 19th century when the Aboriginals began to push the government for treaties and land claims. They investigated these problems and David Mackay spoke for the Nisga’a people saying “what we don’t like about the government is their saying this: ‘we will give you this much land.’ how can they give it when it is our own?
How has Canada maintained a diverse cultural identity? There are many different types of Canadians. There are French Canadians, British Canadians, and Native Canadians. Canada becomes a nation. This happens when gold is found in the Yukon and Yukon Territory is made.
Canada has mistreated its Indigenous people for centuries. The Indian Act (1876) is just one of many ways the government forced their colonial ways of life onto the Indigenous people already living here. It was extremely sexist and gave the Indigenous people very little rights. Bill C-31: The Act to Amend the Indian Act, also known as the new Indian Act, was introduced in April of 1985 by the Canadian government to address the issues regarding discrimination within the Indian Act. The government created this bill with the intention to emphasize equality and give Indigenous communities more self-governing rights.
Freedom A collective is defined as a group of individuals. In Anthem, the collective refers to a group of people who have surrendered their individuality completely. The people within the society depicted cannot be, or believe themselves to be, better than their brothers, nor can they think thoughts which are not also shared with all others.
I personally view the Canadian identity as a topic which may never truly be set in place as the world grows and new influences arrive, yet at the very same i see it as revolving around the set traits that the first peoples and nations(Aboriginals, French, British, etc.) brought and held, whether it be their spiritual, political, lingual, and cultural views. Major parts of the Canadian identity also arise from non-human factors, such as geography, the land in Canada influences the jobs of the people as well as where everyone is displaced. Canada is considered the second largest country in the world, this causes the Canadian identity to differ slightly depending on where one lives. The identity of a Candian can be summed up from the Charter of Rights and freedoms and each person is entitled to in Canada. In a way, the Charter outlines the key values and beliefs that the people hold.
(McNeil 64). As result, "… this contentious issue has been thrown back into the legal and political arenas, where it now must be addressed." (McNeil 62). Admittedly court cases are lengthy and expensive, however, it is the most advantageous answer at this point in time. Then further along in McNeil's argument presented in "Aboriginal Government and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms", he asserts that the ratification of The Charlottetown Accord would have solved this contingency.
Viola’s case became headline of black newspapers and journalist across Nova Scotia and Halifax where many people were outraged by this audacious disregard for Canada’s constitution. King vs Desmond, arose civil rights injustice in Canada that has been “swept under the rug” now the government and the legislative bodies now had to address this issue of segregation and unwritten rules that some provinces still practise (Thomson, Colin A. 1986). Viola case went all the way to the supreme court event thought was turn down, this case left a massive impact on the citizens of Canada because blacks were now paying attention and united under one cause (Thomson, Colin A. (1986). They were no longer going to suffer the same injustice they did in the past,
Canada’s premier origin of its Constitution dates back to the year of 1960 where the first legislation of human rights protection was passed and titled the Canadian Bill of Rights. The ideology behind this Bill was to ensure equality and freedom of to its citizens. However, the Canadian Bill of Rights was not constitutionally entrenched meaning that it was subject to amendment at the governments will. Though, in 1968, once Pierre Elliott Trudeau was elected as prime minister of Canada, he made it his mission to constitutionally entrench a charter of rights that would be constitutionally binding on both the federal and provincial levels of government. Following the events of Trudeau’s elections, a draft of the Canadian Constitutional Charter was presented in May of
Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.
In addition to the rights it already has, the Canadian Charter also has a number of certain group rights. These rights include linguistic and cultural rights for the French Canadian part of the Canadian populations in places of Quebec and New Brunswick, some other rights that are included as well are rights for aboriginal groups. The concept of rights in this group of rights doesn’t really have any recognition to US law where it got them from. Unlike The U.S constitution, the Canadian constitution gives most of the power to its Queen, which gives her more power of everything, while the U.S divides the power as to not give anyone too much authority over some things. While Canada does have a distribution of legislative power, it's not as much of a distribution like the U.S constitution has since Canada has a queen.