3 Qantas; Governance assessment and Recommendations 3.1 Overview of review An independent assessment of the Governance Framework was commissioned by the Qantas board in order both confirm adherence to the framework as well as to consider recommendations and improvements. Qantas have a strong governance framework (Anon, 2016) as is mandated by its regulatory requirements and resulting obligations to its shareholders and the Australian security exchange (ASX, 2014). This assessment was completed via the use of publically accessible documentation that outlines existing governance practices within the Qantas group. 3.2 Qantas Governance framework review This review will consider each of the four areas of the governance framework as discussed in section two above, applying them to Qantas. With a view to discerning both adherence to the framework as well as seeking to identify recommendations for improvement. 3.2.1 Defining governance roles …show more content…
Qantas has a board comprised of eight independent directors as well as the CEO. In addition, there is the existence of several review committees to manage the size and scope of the businesses operations. This emphasis on outside directors predisposes it to a heavy conformance emphasis as the nature of the outside directors dictates they would have limited ability to be active in operational issues, placing a greater emphasis on the abilities of the CEO. The introduction of additional executive directors could afford Qantas with enhanced operational decision making abilities moving
Ministerial responsibility is based on a body of constitutional conventions; it ensures the accountability of the government to the people of Australia. Ministerial responsibility is the responsibility to the parliament by a minister or on a minister’s behalf for actions taken. Ministerial responsibility is a policy that ministers in a government depend on maintaining the support of the parliament. The underlying legal concepts are The Rule of Law, Democracy and the Constitution. The Rule of Law, relates as big decisions about the country are subject to the law.
The critical leadership problem facing the 4th ABCT is weak and toxic leadership has created a unit culture tolerance and indifference. While deployed 4th ABCT’s leadership fostered an elitist unit culture, tolerant of sub-standard and inappropriate behavior, and indifferent to individual development and personal needs. The demands of the short notice deployment coupled with the SFAT mission change create a stressful environment and planted seeds of separation within the BCT. The change from offensive operations to security and stability operations negated the METL tasks 4th ABCT completed during their MRE and resulted in 4th ABCT not receiving properly training or manning during their deployment. The leadership then allowed the SFAT mission to compromise the integrity of the
For this assessment, I will be reflecting on what clinical governance looks like in my workplace, with a critique of the framework used within the organization. During the reflection I will discuss what pillars and principles were found, while describing my fellow team members’ understanding of clinical governance and how it is reflected in their practice. Finding the clinical governance framework for my workplace was challenging and time consuming without computer access in place of hard copy policy and procedure manuals. I found clinical governance summerised through the manuals, ensuring compliance of the 44 accreditation standards (Australian Aged Care Quality Agency, 2014) but as Knight, Kenny and Endacott (2015) discuss, while the concept is accepted, there is a gap between theory and practice, which is visual where I work. Pillars and principles such as risk management, efficiency, effectiveness, patient centric and equity are seen throughout the policies, and to analyse more specifically, clinical governance is articulated under categories, consisting of “education and training, clinical audit, clinical effectiveness, research and development and role clarity” (Davies, Chapman & Boyd, 2015 p.45).
Virgin Australia (Theory in Action) Group-6 Amit Boro PGP14005 Ganeswar Miniaka-PGP13087 Lokesh Kumar-PGP14028 Praveen Kumar-PGP13041 Rahul Kumar Pakhale-PGP14037 Virgin Australia Virgin Australia Airlines is Australia’s second largest airlines as well as the largest by fleet size to use the Virgin brand. The airline was co-founded by British businessman Richard Branson, the founder of parent Virgin Group and Former Virgin Blue CEO Brett Godfrey. It was established in 2000 with two aircraft operating on a single route. The airline has grown to directly serve 29 cities in Australia from hubs in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney, using a fleet of narrow-body Boeing and Embrae, and Airbus and
Legitimacy theory is a “positive theory” that asserts that businesses are bound by the implicit “social contract” that the corporation agrees to perform that are specifically relating to social and environmental issues (Rankin, et al. 2012, 142). To remain congruent with societal values in which it operates, a corporation can address attributes that relate to this theory through voluntary social and environmental disclosures made on platforms like its annual report (Coebergh 2011, 65). Virgin Australia has various groups of important stakeholders who can affect or is affected by both the actions and activities of the corporation (Laasch and Conaway 2014, 97). They are namely, guests, employees, investor groups and shareholders, unions, non-government
This article concerns various elements of the economic environment and their impact upon Qantas, such as significantly lower fuel prices. Representing its largest cost, lower oil prices as a result of oversupply and lack of demand have reduced Qantas’ fuel costs by $597 million since the previous year (O’Sullivan 2015a). Another contributing economic factor has been the Abbott government’s repeal of the carbon tax as part of its fiscal policy, which is said to have boosted Qantas’ pre tax earnings by $116 million (O’Sullivan 2015b). This article further relates to the economic environment as it discusses the impact of the falling value of the Australian dollar on Qantas. Its 25% decline since mid-2014 has encouraged Australian residents to
In the ever changing landscape of health and social care and children and young person’s settings there are many pieces of government legislation and regulatory framework that service providers and organisations must now comply with. For example Care Quality Commission (CQC) introduced the essential standards of quality and safety which are central to the workplace. Every staff member has responsibility for providing good quality social care. Social care governance is the process by which organisations ensure good service delivery and promote good outcomes for people who use services.
The Failure of Dick Smith Electronics Identify: How the latest edition (3rd) of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles plausibly halts the failure of Dick Smith Electronics (DSE) will be discussed in this essay. I argue that 3rd of ASX Corporate Governance Principles might not be the best corporate governance practices for the listed entities in Australia. As can be seen from the DSE case, it complied with the majority of the principles and recommendations, but the DSE’s collapse still happened. Therefore, the better application of this practices should be developed.
Underneath the Chief executive, there is 5 different sectors in Macmillan that are run under the Chief executive and the board of trustees. Which they have to keep under control first sector is services
The inauguration of Virgin Australia Airlines, by Sir Richard Branson, as a domestic carrier in 2000 basically aimed at the convenience of the budget travelers. The Airlines was inaugurated as relaxed informal airline. Sir Richard was open-minded, amiable, and generous with his management team, imaginative, audacious and exclusive in his thoughtfulness. Initially started as a low-cost carrier, the company improved its services to turn itself into a “new-world carrier” as described by themselves (Virgin Blue media release, 2011, para. 2).However all these faltered when Qantas’ past marketing manager took over during 2011.
Hong Kong Dragon Air is Hong Kong-based international airline, belonging to of the Cathay Pacific Group. The airline was established in 1985, and operates a fleet of narrow-body A320s and A321s, which were both powered by V2500 engines manufactured by International Aero Engines AG (“IAE”) for both passenger and cargo service to destinations to destinations across the Asia-Pacific region, and China. Their vision is to be the World’s best regional airline serving China and beyond. Their missions; places emphasis on safety and operational excellence with customer focus. The airline seeks to embrace innovation by implementing ideas that improve their business.
1.0 Introduction to Strategic Management Strategic management practices the formation; achievement and reaching the major objectives executed by the management of the company, by considering the capital and a task of the internal and external environments in which the company wishes to compete. 1.1 Introduction to Singapore Airlines Singapore Airlines (SIA) is established in year 1972 with remarkable performance among its competitors in the industry throughout its 35-year-long history till date (Heracleous & Wirtz, 2009). According to Singapore Airlines (2014), SIA is one of the youngest aircraft fleets worldwide to destinations crossing a network of more six continents, with its iconic Singapore Girl providing excellent standard of service to customers. Throughout the years of operations, SIA has an impressive ever-growing list of industry 's leading innovations such as offering free headsets along with a choice of meals and drinks in Economy Class in the 1970s, followed by introducing satellite based in-flight telephones in year 1991, involving an ample panel of renowned chefs, the International Culinary Panel, to provide lush in-flight meals in year 1998, developing audio and video on demand (AVOD) capabilities on KrisWorld in year 2001, and lastly flying the airbus of A380 from Singapore to Sydney on 25 October 2007 (Singapore Airlines, 2014).
2.0 Inputs - Transformation Process - Outputs 2.1 Inputs Operations management concerns with the conversion of inputs into revenue-creating outputs through the transformation process (Mahadevan, 2010, p.5). Slack et al. (1995 cited in McMahon-Beattie and Yeoman 2004, p.30) mention that inputs are divided in transformed and transforming. Transformed are those that are transformed in some way and transforming inputs are those that are used to carry out the transforming process.
As stated in Principle 1, The Board of Directors directs the Group’s risk assessment, strategic planning, succession planning and financial and operational management to ensure that obligations to shareholders and other stakeholders are understood and met. The board of directors has a collective responsibility for the management of the group to make sure the group is on the way to approach to their objectives while the non-Executive Directors are responsible for bringing independent judgment and scrutiny to decisions taken by the Board of Directors and providing objective challenges to management. Besides, the board of directors also function as formalising and adopting a set of Code of Ethics through the Code of Conduct as Recommendation 1.3 as stated in the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2012 to make sure its compliance, establishing an appropriate set of corporate disclosure policies and procedures and ensuring a whistleblowing mechanism is in place. The Board of Directors recognizes the importance of independence and objectivity in its decision making process. The Directors are professionals of high calibre and integrity and possess in-depth knowledge and experience of the business to enable them to discharge their duties effectively.
Until today, this incident is still affecting Malaysia Airlines in different aspects. Especially, on their corporate image, reputation and finance. Not only Malaysia Airlines, but the image and reputation of our country are also being affected because Malaysia Airlines have strong bonding with the government and they as a representative role stood out to speak for Malaysia Airlines. Malaysia government had given a very bad impression to others on their crisis management and crisis communications. Experts criticized their crisis management by saying “crisis in managing crisis” and “make a crisis worst” due to their failure in crisis communications.