Devlin would have thought the act of polyandry to be immoral and disintegrates the society however, being a moderate moralism he would not have wanted to intervene with the privacy of other unless the act has become very widely practiced and start causing harm to the society. However, if the was a law to be passed to make polyandry legal, Devlin would have disagree with this because once it has been made legal it will drive and encourage many to conduct this immoral act. Devlin did not say that every immoral act is to be prohibited. Devlin used the jury box morality of average right minded citizens where moral standards of behaviour are the standards of behaviour of a reasonable man. Will a reasonable man think the act of polyandry as something good and to be done?
As reporting the case will bring negative impact to the company as well as the employee’s future career, the employees may also worry that they may lose their job too. On the other hand, the victim may worry that their complaint will be claimed as false since the lack of evidence. Therefore, not every victim will report their case, some may tolerate and hide the problem. Thus, the equity cannot be achieved when the power in workplace is too strong that make them to keep it as
A law that may protect people from near death experiences, decrease crime rates, but also puts people in danger when so-called “helping” the victim can go both ways. People often see the bystander law as a good or a bad thing, for starters, the bystander law can protect many people on the streets and make them feel safe if anything bad happens, on the other hand, it may also put people in the risk of danger when getting involved or assisting. A law that gets you fined when failed to assist or report a crime you witnessed, the bystander law can also leave you with a guilty feeling and a jail sentence. The bystander effect began when a woman named Kitty Genovese was murdered in front of her apartment complex and was a witnessed murder by many of the residents in those apartments. Not one called the police, but why?
Any risks may alter movements of people within different states and countries, and this may potentially affect businesses. Terrorist attacks have a negative impact on the image of a country. People always tend to avoid countries that have had a recent terrorist attack because it indicates that the country has weak security measures and this may affect the economic activities and the gross domestic product. Preparing the airport staff in advance prepares them for any adversity they may face which means that they can handle it better once it occurs and even minimizes potential risks and dangers. Although natural calamity may not entirely be prevented, the airport can put in the right mechanisms to prevent the negative impact they
Also, Watkins kept her own interest before the greater good, which exactly is not wrong but maybe is unethical as it could have given justice to many who lost their money. Trust-ethics based analysis of the consequences Trust was severely broken here, one of the investors, two of the employees who worked for the company. Had Watkins not brought this issue up, this could have continued for a long time. Hindsight versus foresight analysis of the problem-resolution In hindsight, Watkins should have directly approached the feds. This would not have let the few go so easily and wouldn’t have impacted the many this severely.
For example, in the case above the chief is trying to create the most pleasure for the most people by signing off the uncompleted maintenance jobs. In this, he/she would be preventing his chain of command from suffering the consequences of not passing the inspection by simply signing off the maintenance jobs. When evaluating gun-decking using Act Utilitarianism, which is assessing an individual act as a single act, it can make great sense to try to save the most people you can from pain and grief by cutting a few corners (Prof. Skerker). Conversely, applying Rule Utilitarianism which is assessing a single act as a general rule to gun-decking, the idea of utility becomes flawed. For instance, if every Division Officer in the Navy allowed maintenance jobs to be falsely done and recorded, then our ships would not be in fight mode or ready to defend the United
They are simply if people see or acting a wrong or inappropriate way reported to a higher authority. this includes cheating stealing or harassment in any form. IR codes can only work if the people in the society are all following it but if not the code cannot work or cause negative impact in the problem it intended to help. The broken Honor Code can lead to people feel like they have to cheat to stay ahead with the others that are cheating. although honor codes of the possibility to help a positive impact on society they are bad because without full cooperation of them members of the society the honor code will feel or have a negative impact on that Society.
On the other hand, companies can incur severe penalties for lack of effective ethical compliance programs and violation by employees. By taking preventive action against misconduct, companies can avoid onerous penalties of violation occurrence. In my company, I will incorporate one of these programs to discourage any type of
A person shall thus contain such caliber in order to meet his responsibility. He should be a person of clean nature otherwise the whole idea of delivering justice to the aggrieved would go into vain and the judiciary would eventually fall. People would eventually start losing their confidence on judiciary thus would lead to more crimes in the society at the cost of injustice. Therefore, a lawyer is very important to maintain a balance in the society. Although It is not possible to frame rules and regulations regarding every aspect of work of a lawyer but a certain set of framework can be adopted so as to keep a moral check on the lawyers.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The violation of an individual by another normally calls for repercussion and or in the least restitution. This is so as a result of long laid down principles that create an enabling environment for peace, law and order. In the situation where such does not take place or is noticeably cut short, a fundamental wrong capable of disturbing the peace of the society has occurred. It is wrong for those given some sort of over by people to misuse or under utilize such powers to the detriment of the people. It can only be left to ones imagination the breach of trust for ones government a person will feel in the instance where an employer assaults a person with intention to rape and one’s home government turns a blind eye.