BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Household work is traditionally viewed as a women’s work and as a result tends to be more devalued in our society because as the value of a housewife’s is non-paid labour is diminished so too is the labour of a woman being paid to do a housewife’s job, of equal significance in its devaluation is the presumption that it is an ‘any female can do it job’ (Coley, 1981, p.7). Domestic workers are among the most exploited groups in a society marked by extreme inequality. Domestic workers suffered triple inequality – that is discrimination based class, sex and aggravated by generally weak position in the labour market. “These inequalities are related to the capitalist system of production in south Africa, which is not unique,
…show more content…
They travelled long distances to work and back home or illegally stayed with employers and were paid meager salaries (Cock 1980: 19). Due to long working hours and the need to travel long distances home, domestic workers in many instances were exposed to family deprivation. Husbands were contract workers visiting their homes once a year and domestic workers often had to leave their children with grandmothers and / or other caregivers for long periods (Cock 1989: 43). The long working hours of domestic workers further added to their social isolation as they had little time for leisure. Some could attend church services once a month on their monthly day off (Cock 1989: 48). In the recent years the number of domestic workers in South Africa has oscillated at around one million. Globally the number of domestic workers is approximate 52.6 million, 83% of whom are women (I.L.O. 2012). In South Africa, the estimated number of domestic workers range between 861,000 (statistics south Africa 2013:xi) and 1.15 million (South African Institute of race relations,2013), 96% of whom are women (statistics South Africa …show more content…
“Secondary analysis involves the use of existing data, collected for the purpose of a prior study, in order to pursue a research interest which is distinct from that of the original work; this may be new research question or an alternative perspective on the original question (Hinds et al; 1997; szabo and strang, 1997). Case studies will be used as a type of qualitative research design. ‘The case study is an intensive investigation of a single unit. This unit can vary: from individual people, families, communities, social groups, organizations and institutions, events and countries’ (Babbie and Mouton, 2011). The following case studies where used in this research paper: “labour legislation in Emfuleni’s domestic workers sector: Awareness and compliance” by Marais, C(2007), “ Enforcement of laws regulating domestic work-a case study of south Africa” written by Sjoberg,E 2011, “ Domestic workers and socio-economic rights : A South African case study” author: Tanzer, Z. 2013, “ An investigation to assess whether or not the employers of domestic workers do comply with the minimum conditions of employment as laid in Sectoral determination 7: Domestic worker sector” written by Sibiya,T. 2006. These case studies are relevant to the research because they assist in answering the research question. They give an intensive investigation of domestic workers and their employers. The given case
Along with the distance, families were separated by long working hours. “[Before] dawn my labor drives me forth tis night when I am free…” (Document 2) Besides children, factories also liked women workers because they were cheaper than men and were afraid to complain. Women worked 12-16 hours a day and six days a week. “A stranger am I to my child; and he one to me.”
Some other unfortunate events was the growth of the urban poor, children switched from working on farms or in homes to working in factories, brick yards, and coal mines. The jobs became much more difficult to do and more dangerous to work at. Workers were overworked, nearly starved, and beaten. “They were often “strapped” or beaten” (Doc 1).
Working longer than twelve hours a day would be considered preposterous for the average worker in modern-day America. Industrialization, however, forced hundreds of men, women, and children alike to work for sixteen hours daily. A poem by an unknown author states that “[before] dawn my labor drives me forth tis night when I am free” (Document 2). Workers have to get up even before dawn to begin their work, and they don’t return until late at night. This was particularly difficult for the women workers, as they were still expected to cook, clean, and care for the household even after working interminable hours of labor.
Even though some women did work, it was more commonly thought of only men who did labor. Labor rarely mentioned housewives, domestic servants, and female outworkers. The idea that the men were the head of the house meant that he, not the wife, should bring in income to support his family (Foner 351). According to the newspaper Workingman’s Advocate, “Capitalism tore women from their role as ‘happy and independent mistresses’ of the domestic sphere and forced them into the labor market, thereby undermining the natural order of the household and the authority of its male
Living in neighborhoods that can literally injure or murder a small child. In this paper I will go through how immigrants went through their daily life and how they adapted or not. I will first go over the living conditions that an immigrant worker would have to deal with. Most immigrants that worked at the Union Stockyards lived in places that were
Experiencing “...fatigue and exposure to weather, necessary to their conditions”, women suffered immensely because working conditions which they exhibited were often unsanitary and dangerous (Anonymous, Document 1). Majority of women found jobs in domestic service, textile factories, and piece work shops, and despite claims that the Industrial Revolution provided increased wages and a better standard of living, it however, resulted in the life of hardship for many. Because “remains of the absolutism of slavery still linger in the conventional arrangements of domestic service”, the Industrial Revolution epitomized inequality in the workforce (Linton). By being exposed to unsanitary working environments where women “...live under ground or just below the roof”, the lives of women had little improvements (Liton). Not only did women experience poor working conditions, they furthermore, were victimized by the unequal distribution of wages.
Some of the conditions were low pays, no safe at all to work in, over crowed in factories, working days were long. Some people work 10 to 12 hours a day. There was no job security, no workman’s companion , no retirement fund.
There were a lot of children in one family, so money was an issue which was why most children worked. They were at home or at the factories they didn’t go
During the early 1900’s and the years before, it was common for children to work in factories, mills, and any other industrial jobs. Families at the time depended on the income these children earned. Concern began to raise of the effects these strenuous jobs and long hours had on children. These long hours deprived these children of their education; children would work sixty to seventy hours a week. It was rare for working children to get fresh air, time to play and enjoy their youth.
The families were first altered because of the pay the man of the house was receiving. The low pay made it very hard to be able to afford a house and put food on the table. Mothers and children had to go to work just to pay for simple necessities. Most female workers performed unskilled or semi-skilled machine work but some worked in industries that demanded heavy labor. Some women, for instance, worked on railroads, while others were employed as machinists.
These workers faced dangers everyday and received little pay. At the same time, many other people also had more money and leisure time. Henry George’s book, Progress and Poverty, talks about this divide. “ It was as though an immense wedge were being forced, not underneath society, but through society. Those who are above the point of separation are elevated, but those who are below are crushed down” (Document 3).
As the standard of living changed, so did the steps one family would need to take in order to survive. The rise of “railroad tycoons” and corruption made unfair wages paid to families even lower, forcing each member, including women and children, to support their families. This impacted numerous families negatively. Oftentimes, parents would work full days, only to come home at night to find their children asleep. “A stranger am I to my child; And he one to me” (Doc.
The societal and political atmosphere for women was severely limited; women were expected to be homemakers and were frowned upon for working outside of the home if they were married1. They could
In “The Pastoralization of Housework” by Jeanne Boydston, Boydston explores the effect of the romanization of housework. The pastoralization of housework that occurred during the Antebellum period was the result of the development of early industrialization. In order to have something remain constant in the changing times the formation of two separate gender spheres allowed a routine to an ever changing society. A result of these two spheres was the pastoralization of domestic labor in the early 1800s that made labor ‘invisible’ and began to discredit the women’s work at home, but also raised them to a higher pedestal in the family dynamic. By embracing the idea of True Motherhood women were able to flourish by the naturalization of the social
Marriage is an important institution in a society and although there have been changes in the trend of marriage pattern, it is still very clear that marriage still matters. Marriage exists and its main aim is to bring two people together to form a union, where a man and a woman leave their families and join together to become one where they often start their own family. Sociologists are mostly interested in the relationship between marriage and family as they form the key structures in a society. The key interest on the correlation between marriage and family is because marriages are historically regarded as the institutions that create a family while families are on the other hand the very basic unit upon which our societies are founded on.