This method takes less time as the interviews and questionnaires are not requiring too much detail. Researchers have proper control group and comparison group to make the research impact more valid. Although its cover a wider range but as an issue it’s more costly because it includes travelling. Quantitative research is something one can bet on as it’s based on exact numbers and figures showing the differences. It includes more concerned interviews with relevant defined question which cannot be changed.
b. Ends: The products, services or processes are of distinctive nature. Successful frugal innovations are not only lower in cost, but outperform the alternative, and can be made available at large scale. Often, but not always, frugal innovations have an explicitly social mission. For many people, frugal innovation may be equated to the creation of cheap, low–tech products.
All this leads to a smaller workforce (DJC’s 94 vs. ACC’s 396). DJC could easily replicate this US if it chooses to relocate. The product design strategy of DJC was more oriented towards making the operations more streamlined and reliable. It believed that efficient manufacturing was the basis of its competitive strategy. This is in contrast to the batch production process followed by ACC which accommodated greater customer flexibility but at the cost of efficiency with some product lines being as long as 1.5 to 2 days 4.
In the other word, this is a type of secondary data collection. Conclusive research Conclusive research prefer to use statistical tests, advanced analytical techniques and larger sample sizes to exploratory research compared the number of conclusive studies are more inclined to use, rather than quality technology Methods of Conclusive Research: Cross-sectional study was originally developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, epidemiology studies used research,
For this, contextual variables need to be examined in detail which cannot happen in statistical studies. Secondly, another example of case studies is that they are able to generate new theories. They can identify new variables and build new hypotheses. This happens through deviant cases as well as by other methods like interviewing participants. When interviewing participants, they might be asked about some variables ‘x’ or ’y’ and they give the answer ‘z’ so this will help researchers develop some new hypotheses through the added variable.
Moreover, different methods will be used on different occasion and different area. It is believed that quantitative research is more trusted due to people always claim that it is systematic. This raises a question, is qualitative research unsystematic? There are various claims and arguments regarding this issue. Some might support saying that quantitative research is systematic because it is based on numerical data analysed statistically, while qualitative research uses non-numerical data.
Nevertheless, those who will participate in the study will have already spent a considerable amount of time in their schools’ international departments where they are preparing their future study in an American university. This will add breadth and depth the data that will be collected. Though it will take a considerable amount of time and effort to get permission to conduct the interviews in five separate schools in China, it will help to ensure that the information collected will have a greater amount of legitimacy and accuracy. Explicitly choosing to conduct the interviews with Chinese students who are already in training for American-style education in five different high schools is a practical way of gathering the best most reliable data. The level of maturity of the high school student participants and the experience of their international and Chinese teachers and that of the administrators will give them the needed level of critical evaluation of the efficacy of their international university preparation programs in which they currently
On the other hand, it is also more easier for the new entrants to enter such market due to customer loyalty is very low as there are more likely to switch to another Nasi Katok business or other such as Ideal and Ayamku. Thus, this component of the Five Forces analysis indicates that it is very easy to the new entrants to compete against this business; hence the threat of new entrants should be a priority in Nasi Katok’s
In other words, this is therefore my stand/position, making a recognition that quantitative and qualitative research are interconnected with distinctive epistemological and ontological assumptions but the connections are not fixed , implying that a research strategy should be autonomous and we should try to avoid/minimize the usual notion that a typical ‘leading’ research strategy works in all circumstances. Hence, a hybrid of research methods, keeping the epistemological and ontological background as it is, provides a better explanation, than a mere rely of one method. In doing so then, we can ensures respecting ideas and dialogue of others thereby opening mind to learn from the same to bring new knowledge in a solidarity way despite diverse epistemological
Low budget to carry out sampling Collecting information from the entire population of a target market would have a very high cost. Sampling provides the advantage that it is just a small number of people used who represent an entire population, making the cost low. 2. Sampling is more time-efficient Compared to collecting information for the entire population, Sampling is far less time-consuming. It is also usually a quicker method than, for example, tabulation, the census technique or analysis.