METHODOLOGY
1.0. INTRODUCTION
The chapter discusses the tools and techniques which can be used to conduct research to achieve the objectives of the study. The research will use both the qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. This chapter includes research design used, population, and sample size, sampling techniques, data collection procedures and how data was analysed. The chapter also discusses the research techniques, instrumentation, population, strength, weakness of the research. 3.1. RESEARCH DESIGN
A research design is a plan, structure and strategy of investigating to get answers to research questions or problems. The plan is s complete scheme of the research. It includes an outline of what the research will do from
…show more content…
The research was analysed both qualitatively quantitatively. Qualitative research is used to understand, explain, explore, discover and clarify situations, feelings, perceptions, attitudes, values, beliefs and experiences of a group of people. The study designs are therefore often based on deductive rather than inductive approach and are flexible and emergent in nature. They are non-linear and non-sequential in their operationalization. The study design mainly entails the selection of people from whom the information, through an open frame of enquiry is explored and gathered. The parameters of the scope of a study, and information gathering methods and processes are often flexible and evolving. Whilst on the other hand quantitative research, the measurement and classification requirements of the information that is gathered demand that study designs are more structured, rigid, fixed and predetermined in their use to ensure accuracy in measurement and classification. Quantitative study design has more clarity and distinction between designs and methods of data collection. The reason of using a mixed method design is that the researcher will gain in breath depth of understanding and validation, while offsetting the weaknesses inherent to using each approach alone (Schulenburg …show more content…
There are two type of sampling methods and this study will use a probability sampling. Probability sampling method is a technique with which one can specify the probability that each member of the population will be included in the sample. It is an ideal method of sampling and it is the only approach that makes possible the selection of a valid representative group and hence allow for valid generalization of findings from sample of the population, (Linda 2005). This research uses a stratified random sampling. The population will be divided into four stratum being management team, marketing team, compliance team and general staff team. The reason for using a random sampling was to provide an adequate data analysis in each stratum. An advantage of using a stratified random sampling is to minimize sample section bias and ensuring that a certain segment of the population is not under presented or over
Stratified Random Sampling because she chooses students equally from girls and boys group. e. A researcher wants to analyze the issues that teacher’s in her district believe to be detrimental to student achievement. He prints a list of all 2,200 district employees and choose every 8th person on the list to be in his
Available methods To achieve accuracy and effectiveness when carrying out this research, careful consideration of the methodology is needed. To restate, carrying out this research will obtain qualitative data
During the planning phase of choosing which organizations and nationality individuals would best be suitable to provide the necessary information that is required, as well as, which staff members of Simply United Foundation, LLC would provide the information. There were many methods to choose how to survey, and what type of scale to used, will the information of the survey return with the right amount of information. What group should be focus on versa, useful questions to ensure the communication engage the problem, deciding who could provide the information, should I include non- community services population. In addition, how would I uses the information, which information would be require to actually find reliable findings.
Introduction. The population within the neighborhood of Greenfield rd. and Fenkell ave. of Detroit, Michigan, also known as 48227 has increased drastically over the years.
A cross-sectional qualitative study using purposive sampling to select children of differing ages was conducted. One researcher with a history in qualitative studies interviewed the 32 children participating in the study. The researcher held practice interviews with a colleague with experience interviewing children. When possible children were interviewed in their home, although 3 of the children were interviewed in a hospital setting. Interviews lasted between 17 and 90 minutes.
Cut-off date 27 February. Part1: Essay. ‘Evaluate the contribution of a qualitative approach to research on friendship’. Part2: DE100 project report – Method.
Introduction Qualitative research are those kind of researches that an outcome is obtained without the application of statistical methods of data analysis (Strauss and Corbin, 1990 cited in Golafshani, 2003). However, the qualitative research takes a direct approach, where the researchers arrive at a conclusion through the observation of events as they occur naturally without external interferences (Golafshani, 2003). Ethical and methodological issues may arise, therefore in order to demonstrate the legitimacy of Qualitative research it is important to integrate rigour and trustworthiness. Potential ethical issues There is the need to take into consideration ethical issues that may arise from conducting qualitative researches.
The author used a qualitative interview survey to determine how practitioners defined social care, whether they practiced it, and what factors influenced their practice, and the information bases they used. Findings from the analysis identified that the personal domain had considerable influence on day-to-day practice, and five themes emerged describing the personal domain: ‘life experiences’, ‘beliefs and values’, ‘ideas and theories’, ‘personal relationships’, and ‘personal characteristics’. I feel this contribution is relevant to the topic because it opens space to explore personal domain challenges for social work practitioners and students, to critically reflect on how life experiences, beliefs/values, ideas/ theories and personal relationships,
Additionally, the sample group is usually small so that members can also share their experience with other research
At the focus group meeting, which consisted of three cath lab nurses and six charge nurses, recommendations and suggestions for improving the SBAR communication form were discussed and voted on for approval by a show of hands. Using the focus group's recommendations, I created a revised and updated hand-off tool to be used hospital-wide for all nurses to use on every patient. The focus group reviewed the finished form and after full acceptance it was submitted to the director for approval. After reviewing, the director stated he was pleased with the end product, and declared it would be submitted to the hospital committee for affirmation. Approximately two weeks later, the director informed me that the committee was delighted with the updated hand-off form and that it was being forwarded to the next department for endorsement.
Using a stratified random sample of respondents to study the relationship between voting behaviour and higher education will reduce the sampling error greatly, even to zero depending on what is known. Since a larger selection of respondents is selected, the amount of variables is limited, which decreases sampling bias. In this case, I can group individuals by their level of education, select a proportional sample, and learn their voting behaviour. A disadvantage to this method is that I am limited to the data that is available for me to use. If reliable and up to data is not available, then my findings would not be reliable.
Additionally, the systematic approach offers the researchers and the statisticians with a level of control and a sense of process (Kalton, 2014). Therefore, it is precisely beneficial for the studies with a narrowly established hypothesis. The systematic sampling technique normally makes sure that there are high levels of representativeness; hence it does not require usage of a table representing random numbers. The other merit of systematic sampling is that in a clustered selection, a situation where the randomly chosen samples are not close together in the population, it is typically eliminated by the approach of systematic sampling. Another merit of routine sampling is that it has the low-risk
The literature review gives justified information for the need of conducting the research. Apart from the introduction, there is no other information concerning the research title that could offer detailed information (Chaliha et a., 2001). Despite giving the justified information in the introduction section the paper should have had the literature review section, thus it did not follow the due steps and format of a research paper. The methodology part follows after the introduction and it discloses the methods used, the design, the people included in the study and how the data was sampled and examined. However, the reasons for choosing the design in the research were not
Is the research question complex? b. How to Write a Research Question Pick a general area of research that is interesting Do some preliminary research and brainstorm ideas Avoid questions that are too broad Make sure the question is specific Hypothesis Statements Normally written in the form of an if/then statement, a hypothesis is an educated guess about how things work. It is an attempt to answer questions with an explanation that can be tested through study and experimentation. The basic idea of a hypothesis is that there is no pre-determined outcome.
As we use various aspects of both the methodologies, the mixed research methodology has several advantages. This methodology offers multiple ways to approach the problem faced by the researchers. Generalizing the qualitative data and analyzing the unexpected data that emerge out of the research are the key aspects of the Mixed Research Methodology. Since it infuses the qualitative and quantitative ways, data resources like case studies, articles, interviews and surveys are combined in mixed research methodology. Mixed Methodology preferred where researchers are capable to gather aspects including data research and assimilation.