Rough draft essay
Everyone knows that Canada is a peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian they will tell you that this is not the case. For there is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda, Quebec has considered and has gone as far to hold referendums over Separatism (Surette,2014). Separatism is that the province of Quebec separates from the rest of Canada to form its own country. Which would have immense effects on indubitably Quebec but also the rest of Canada (Martin, 2014). This report will focus on the basic causes and origin of Quebec Separatism,
…show more content…
Where Quebec was experiencing it’s Quiet Revolution out of the dark ages. Slowly the province is relying less on the Catholic Church and more on government and industry (Library and Archives Canada, 2005). The new economic success for Quebec made Quebecois want to keep what they earned and be forced to share it with the rest of Canada (Noel, 2009). That along with what seemed like less rights for French Canadians in the Canadian constitution, made Quebecois very furious with how they are being treated by Canada. What resulted was the formation of the Bloc de Quebecois a national party with the priority of separating Quebec (History of Canada, 2006). The Bloc Quebecois along with the FLQ provided enough international propaganda, that two referendums took place for Quebec citizens to decide if they wished to separate. Both of these referendums ended up in favour of Quebec not seperating however were decided in the closest of margins (Noel, 2009). But this issue isn’t over yet and is still very present today. Although the issue isn’t as strong as it was in the later 1900’s you can tell that the issue is still with us. It is in clear depiction when you notice the social barriers the French and English have, which more then just surpasses the language barrier (Brenhouse, 2013). If visiting Montreal it is more difficult then it should be for an English person to get …show more content…
Quebec Separatism was no different, and in 1982 Canada’s Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau changed our constitution giving it many more rights to French Canadians in the height of the separation crisis (History of Canada, 2006). This was actually a good solution and is a large reason why the interest for Quebec Separatism is so low today. After the new constitution Quebecois felt that they have not lost there freedom after all and saw a bright future staying in Canada (Patriquin,2014). But the key to making this issue even less significant is to finally break the social barriers between the French and English (Scott, 2011). This is a lot easier said then done because of the long history of conflict between one another. In order for it to work both French and English people will have to agree to make an effort. The only way for the social barriers to be broken is to first change the beliefs and opinions of one another. If French people stop believing that they must resent the English then they wont. As simple as that (Scott, 2011). Another thing that would help is for they’re to be another solution to Quebec’s problems with Canada instead of Separatism. Separatism is a very dangerous thing to play with because it will change not only Quebec but also the rest of Canada and not just how it looks on a map (Surette, 2014). If Canada’s most multicultural province separates at the cause of
In Chapter 4, “Polarization and Pluralism” Bibby’s focus is on how problems may come about when extremists of different natures, some being very religious from others being not the slightest bit religious, come together in Canada. He concludes at the end of the chapter that this balance, this polarization within Canada may actually be good for our own unique country (p.97).
The act changed quebec into two parts and this is the beginning of britian taking over canada and creating to separate parts This map” shows the”ACT OF UNION . In 1849 Upper Canada and Lower Canada merged and two colonies became known as the Province of Canada . The new government meant equal representation for Canada East and Canada West the reason for this was English speaking people were
Over the early years of 1900 I believe that Canada is a divided and self-centered country because of the four problems Laurier faced during that time period. Firstly Laurier was divided between English Canadian and French Canadians. Whatever he did he seemed to never be able to please either side or get them to agree on the same point. In the Boer War English Canadians and French Canadians had a disagreement over the fact that if they should be sending army troops over to South Africa to help out Britain in the war.
When the Pontiacs war came to an end, the British found that they had to do much more in order to fulfill the needs of the French Canadians. As had been mentioned earlier, there are those Canadians who had close relations with the French at the time that the latter had seceded and left the land in the jurisdiction of the British. In order to satisfy this population, the British came up with the Quebec act of 1774. This document contained among other things, the parts of the French civil law that would remain place. Additionally, the document allowed for the extension of Quebec’s boundaries, which would now extend to the south of the Ohio River.
The majority of Quebec wish to stay in Canada, and the province shouldn’t secede against the majorities’ wishes. Most groups within Canada seek to gain independence through peaceful measures, although some groups have advocated and used violent means. Thus, Quebec federalists argue for autonomy, whereas Quebec sovereignties, mostly with the Parti Quebecois, argued for
The province of Quebec had wanted to separate from Canada for a decent amount of time. The thoughts of separation came in the late 1950’s and 1960’s, but was in full effect in the late 1960’s to the 1970’s, mostly due to the creation of the Parti Quebecois, created in 1968. It had become popular due to the party’s leader being René Lévesque, who was not only popular but influential too. In Canada, their urge to separate grew larger, for there were two moments in time, where they wanted to separate. In order for the province to separate, they had to have a referendum.
The unification of both Canadas (eliminating the previous Upper and Lower Canadian borders) created a large difference in population between the English and French, setting an English Majority (and sparking racial tensions). B. Removal of the existing Upper and Lower Canadian legislatures, which were functioning until their
The Canadian political system is based entirely on democracy. As a democracy it has the duty “to protect itself against the forces of dissolution as soon as they [appear]” (Pierre Trudeau 133). Few people would disagree with the government’s decision to invoke the act. Surely because of the apprehension, almost everybody in the nation was feeling during the violent insurrection in Quebec. Resulting from “seven years of terrorist assaults in Montreal and Ottawa” (130) in which “resulted in six deaths” (Eric Kierans 181).
National Assembly of Québec, National Assembly of Québec, 16 June 2019, https://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-loi/projet-loi-21-42-1.html. Rowe, Daniel J. “More than Half of Quebec Law and Education Students in Survey Say Bill 21 Is Making Them Want to Leave the Province.” Montreal, CTV News, 16 Mar. 2022, https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/more-than-half-of-quebec-law-and-education-students-in-survey-say-bill-21-is-making-them-want-to-leave-the-province-1.5821460. Rubertucci, Alyssia. “Quebec's Bill 21 'Disturbing' Impact on Religious Minorities: Study.”
The thirty-two years between 1759 and 1791 serve to be the most important and defining period in Canadian history. It is during this time when the British conquest of New France occurs, the Quebec Act comes into effect and the first step towards Canadian confederation is taken with the proclamation of the Constitutional Act. It is also during this time when the American Revolution takes place and essentially results in the creation of two countries: the United States of America and Canada. The Revolution triggers the mass exodus of more than 80,000 refugees out of the Thirteen Colonies, half of who migrate primarily into Quebec, the Maritimes and Ontario. The influx of the United Empire Loyalists immediately boosts Canada’s population and forever
In many countries, conflict between different groups of people is inevitable. In Canada, the divide between English-speaking and French-speaking regions has been a prominent political and cultural topic since the birth of the nation. The most well known of these conflicts goes to Quebec. The province has sprouted several movements and parties supporting the autonomy and independence of Quebec. One of those parties is the Bloc Quebecois.
To call this era of drastic change the ‘Quiet Revolution’ is a vivid, and yet, paradoxical description. The Quiet Revolution was a time of intense socio-political and socio-cultural change in Quebec, which extended beyond Quebec’s borders because of its influence on contemporary Canadian politics. As a result of the effects of the changes that occurred during this Quiet Revolution, most Quebec provincial governments since the early 1960s have maintained political and social orientations based on the core concepts developed and implemented during the Quiet Revolution. As such, there is no doubt that the Quiet Revolution had a significant impact in Canadian History. This impact can be characterized by the prelude to the Quiet Revolution; the demographic evolution of Quebec; the social educational reforms that were put in place; the economic reforms and their impact; the rise of nationalism; and finally, the cultural changes that occurred.
Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.
Canada was a place of conflict and change beginning under the monarchy and ending with the democracy with a lot of change in power from the French to the British.
Today, Canada is seen as a multicultural and peaceful nation that has evolved over the course of history. This great nation would never have been possible without the impact that former Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson left on this country. His achievements and insights profoundly affected and shaped Canada’s nation. First, peacekeeping is an important part of Canada’s heritage and a reflection of its fundamental beliefs that Pearson implemented after dealing with world changing situations and winning a Nobel Prize. Also, his contributions as a liberal leader as well as the flaws and controversy with Diefenbaker did in fact define this country.