A Rhetorical Analysis Of Queen Elizabeth I's Speech

Queen Elizabeth I gives a speech to her troops to prepare them for the invasion. Her motives are clear that she is pushing her soldiers to be courageous. Having to also suggest that a women can rule over thousands of men. Her purpose is to persuade them that victory will be England 's if they trust and serve under her .

Queen Elizabeth recognized her position of power and consequently sought to maintain it. Her last speech to Parliment in 1601 was calculated and designed to convince listeners that she deserves to rule. The speech was rhetorically adequate for the situation she delivered it. Elizabeth used two main methods to appeal to the two main types of listeners, which concisely convinced her subjects to regard her as a benevolent ruler. These two main components to the rhetorical were pious humility for the educated and clerical listeners/readers and the mention of God and love for the uneducated, religious, and illiterate listeners.

She also mentions that she has “come amongst you, as you see… to live and die amongst you all.”

On account of Queen Elizabeth’s prior knowledge that the Spanish was the favored side of the battle, she is lead to use rhetorical strategies. Upon reciting her speech, Queen Elizabeth used these strategies in order to provoke her audience’s favor. In addition, the queen ensures to utilize a persona of a common citizen so that the audience feels that she is being personal with them. This will result in a form of trust between the queen and the audience.

She inspires her soldier to proudly defend England by complementing them, asserting nationalism, and giving them a purpose. Throughout her speech she repeatedly makes a reference to God and country to evoke a strong sense

Elizabeth I, Queen of England from 1558-1603, brought much success and political stability to England during her reign. However, the ideas about gender at the time greatly influenced her rule. With the views of the religious peoples during Elizabeth’s reign leaning towards negativity about a woman ruler, Elizabeth I responded to these challenges against her ability to rule wisely with sophisticated anger and strong leadership, while not responding to the challenges to her authority as a religious leader. One of the main challenges to Elizabeth’s right to rule came from the church. Document 1, “First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women” by John Knox, a Scottish religious reformer, shows the biased views of a Scot who

Women’s history is often degraded to the debate of upper-class white women. The stereotypical idea that women occupied the domestic sphere did not apply to several women associated with famous men, as well as, white women who broke the barriers of their generation. Martha Washington was one of the most admired and well-known women of the American Revolution. This founding mother had to make different choices when her husband became commander-in-chief of the Continental Army in 1775. My goal in this paper is to prove why Martha Washington was an exemplary founding mother and why many women respected her and followed her path.

There is no word that is not useful, and she chose them carefully, with thought. She emphasizes her respect for the soldiers with words like “faithful and loving people” and the “loyal hearts and good will

She is an upper class Victorian woman and her ideals correspond to her stature in society. One of the most evident examples of Lady Bracknell’s outspoken ideals is seen in her interrogation of Jack Worthing. Once Lady Bracknell finds out that Jack and Gwendolen are interested in each other, she examines Jack with a series of questions. Lady Bracknell likes the answers to the first few questions she poses but calls Jack a “cloak-room” and “a parcel” after finding out he was found in a handbag as a baby (Wilde 25). The comments Lady Bracknell makes about Jack’s upbringing shows the reader that she looks down upon him.

The cause for Spenser 's equivocation could be situated in his mindset toward queen Elizabeths authority, and it could additionally have a more commonly though connected speculative groundwork. Britomart 's capacity to dress as a masculine identity and have the force it requires, even as she can put on the weapons and armor, is conceivably destructive in the sixteen century England, what it says about the ways of power and authority; that they are merely formulations that can be taken up, even by a woman, rather than innate trait of the male. It 's not surprising that Spenser removes the strong female knight from the story; it is no wonder that her taking up of the armor of authority is creatively connected with the destruction of a powerful tower, as the character of Britomart has the capability to expose a gap in the infrastructure of patriarchy. The Faerie Queene is believed to be a political storytelling regarding the private and foreign position of England with Elizabeth on the throne. Spenser decidedly declared that the Faerie Queene and Britomart both serve as depictions for Queen Elizabeth I.

Philip II had been contemplating an invasion on England, however, due to Spain’s financial situation, the ability of taking on such an operation made the King reluctant. After the execution of the Roman Catholic, Mary Queen of Scots, he wanted to seek revenge. Being married to Mary Tudor and equally like her wishing to see England return to Roman Catholicism, Philip was determined, as well as being backed by a country which was known as the strongest Catholic nation in Europe. Many factors influenced his decision; however, in 1585 Elizabeth contributed to his decision to attack. This was through Elizabeth helping the Protestants in the Netherlands when they revolted against their Spanish overlords led by the Duke of Parma.

Rhetorical Devices in “Speech in the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” was a persuasive speech in favor of the revolution against the British Parliament. Like many people, at the time, Henry wanted to break free from Britain and start the United States of America. He delivered the speech on March 23, 1775 to the Virginia Convention with serious tone in attempt to rally up the convention for war. In the speech Henry used many rhetorical devices to persuade the convention. Some of the more effective devices are restatement, hypophora, and antithesis.

In 1775 the Virginia Convention was deciding to fight against the British and Patrick Henry was ready for this war. He presents his people the speech to fight the British and his argument is “there is no retreat but in submission and slavery” meaning that they have to fight or else they will lose everything to the British.

What do you know about the audience based on the information provided in the speech? Based on the information provided in this speech, I know that the audience is her army of soldiers fighting. Queen Elizabeth I is providing her soldiers with confidence and motivation. She is trying to make them succeed and become better men. How does Queen Elizabeth I use the audience’s faith and belief in God as a way to convince them to believe and agree with her? Why is it a good idea for her to remind them of her divine right to rule before sending them into battle?

The authors use the narrative techniques of mood, tone, and purpose to convey the theme of fighting for your rights and freedom. This essay will discuss the similarities in theme, differences in theme, similarities in narrative techniques and differences in narrative techniques. In Susan B. Anthony’s speech she is fighting for women's freedom and in Patrick Henry’s speech he is fighting for his country's independence. There are many similarities between both texts but the main one is that they are fighting for what they want.. They both use tone to convince their readers that what they say is true.