Ghana has a history of queen mother that has lasted through the pre-colonial, the colonial, the post-colonial and into the modern era. The reason for this is the role of the queen mother allows women a space for women in Ghanaian society. Women spaces developed through ceremonial duties and the queen mother 's court to hear women 's cases. Part of the reason that queen mothers have had a lasting role in Ghanaian society is the power of the duality of gender. The chief and queen mother represent gender duality. Gender duality has caused legal pluralism that is centered on the queen mother 's court 's role and state court. In Ghana, the queen mothers have a place in society as part of dual gender roles in their culture. Queen mothers allow for …show more content…
The court is part of the social structure, and it allows for women who cannot afford going to state court to have a way to handle disputes. The existence of both state and queen mothers court-created legal plurality, rooted in gender plurality. The legal plurality means the there is a space for women in the queen mother court, and a way for women grievances to be heard. It is legal and gender plurality in Ghana that allowed for queen mothers to develop into the modern era, and retain political, social, and cultural power. Ultimately, the queen mothers court allows for a space for women with Akan people.
The queen mothers court was the central representation of women 's space and understanding the modern role of queen mothers. The cases that are brought before the queen mother are concerned with the matters pertaining to women. The court was a space that allowed for women to have their voices heard by female leadership. The case typically brought to court were about divorce, land, marriage, sexual relationship, and witchcraft, essential issues that affect women. In the court, women narrate their own stories before a body of
…show more content…
Ultimately, queen mother 's court created space allows women seek justice. Importantly, the queen mother hears women cases as part of her role in women welfare, and queen mothers are also, familiar with the issues of women 's daily life. The queen mothers court allows for women to have space, and in "the space" of the court allows women to have power. Women 's power is through the language they use when presenting their case to gain leverage over men if men are part of the dispute in the case. The language that women use is considered one of politeness, while men believe that this type of language is a weakness. In the male belief that polite language is weak, men miss the importance, and power of polite language. Polite language allows women to speak about topics that are unspeakable. Giving women the power to speak of their experiences and seek justice even if the topic is taboo. The queen mothers court not only represents a space for women but a space in which any women can have power and
Queen Elizabeth I spoke about her faults as a woman and the fact that she, a woman, has a “heart and stomach of a king” (6). This shows that women were aware they were being looked down upon as they compared a strong heart and stomach to one that only a king could have. This speech shows that its
A group of young women are able to control the courts with their acting. Because the judges believed the girls it caused mass hysteria. This hysteria led the judges to unfairly punish those who were scapegoated. For example, the judges would accuse John Proctor and Giles for “contempt of the court” when they were only defending themselves. Because the court was consumed by a feeling of mass hysteria, the court ran unfair trials.
This is a rebuttal, defending the right for women to enter the public sphere in order to provide a maternal and caring service that is associated with
In Deborah Tannen’s article, “But What Do You Mean?” Tannen exchanges her view on seven topics of a predicament in a communication between both men and women. The seven topics which are apologies, criticism, thank-you’s, fighting, praise, complaints, and jokes. In this article, Tannen focuses on women mostly as her primary examples, such as giving more examples of women’s misinterpreting and miscommunicating in conversations. However, I believe that her article is too old and that her claims about the ways men and women communicate are too rigid.
Back in the 1600s women, sadly, did not have power. They were not to be seen or heard, the only time they did have a little bit of power is when there husband was gone. They would not stand out or stand up for themselves, and normally if a women did this, their opinion would usually get ignored. In the famous tragedy Macbeth, women show determination and great power unlike back in the day. First, the author uses the three witches to show power when they talk to Macbeth about the prophecies, misleading him into thinking that he can not be defeated.
A woman 's place in this play and in this time period was in the house taking care of the chores and children, than their other job was to go to church and make sure their family goes to church. Women are always doing anything the men ask them to do without a hesitation, if they didn’t want to do it they would make their wife or servant do it for them, because they have more power than the women did. A
Having a female sovereign (Elizabeth I of England) meant that the issue of gender roles was one of discussion,
Recent headlines have highlighted the fact that rape culture is prevalent in our society, most noticeably on college campuses. To understand why this is a social issue we first have to understand what rape culture entails. Rape culture is a set of assumptions that reinforces male sexual aggression and disregards violence against females (Hildebrand & Najdowski, 2015, p. 1062). Simplified, it is an environment where sexual violence is normalized and most of the time excused. One out of five females in the United States are sexually assaulted by a male at some point in their lifetime (Hildebrand & Najdowski, 2015, p. 1059) and college aged females are four times more likely to be a victim of rape than any other age group (Burnett et al.,
They were only seen as child bearers who look after the children while cleaning the home and cooking for the family. She spoke upon the issues about woman also having property rights as well right next to the husband. “She did not specify what legal reforms would accomplish her purpose. She never advocated that women vote, hold public office, or otherwise cross into the public orbit of the male” (Akers, 49) With this she understood how to get her points across without disturbing the peace. Bringing up these issues lightly allowed her to have others understand where she stood with her ideas for women’s rights.
Although for ages men and women have had conflicting roles. Men have primarily grasped higher positions of power in government and additionally within the church. From very early on women would not go against the given social structure. When Queen Elizabeth I took the throne in 1558 ( her reign from 1558-1603) she faced bias ways of many, the notion of a women leading their nation was unimaginable causing numerous people to question her capabilities as a ruler. Unlike other women, Queen Elizabeth discarded the negative perspective by being captivating to her subjects through compassion, but also by her asserting the power and dominance over her kingdom.
Women’s place and role in the society is something that has been discussed and changed over time. Should their rights be the same as men’s? Should they be superior? Inferior? The world faces a dilemma on weather they should be or not equal as men.
Baier also gives the example of childrearing and how it is usually women who disagree with this method because of “justice perspectives”. Another issue that arises is the difference between the justice and
Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.
In her essay “Justice, Gender and the Family”, she claims that the prevailing theories of justice exclude the system of gender and the traditional family as settings where justice standards should also be applied, resulting to family issues negatively impacting women’s equality of opportunity. Justice in the family is necessary for justice in greater society to happen. Okin believes that gender inequalities should be addressed legislatively, such as anti-discrimination employment laws and paid maternity
The queen mother told her, “…but you are not a man” when she insisted that she wanted to rule the whole kingdom. The queen mother’s statement suggested her enforcement of men in leadership, neglecting women. Here, the text skilfully employed the queen mother to disregard her daughter’s