The Boston Massacre, which passage includes more evidence and support towards facts about the Massacre? Passage number 2 provides more evidence and support than the first passage. This doesn’t mean that the first passage doesn’t do good, this just means that the passage number 2 does a better job at explaining the stuff.
Both of the passages give reasonsings for what the Massacre is, but passage 2 has a better and more appropriate explanation. Usually people say quality over quantity, but even though Passage 2 is longer, it still is the most efficient passage to go along with the Boston Massacre.
So what is so special about Passage 2?Passage 2 gives a more effective, clean reasoning for what they’re trying to talk about. This passage gets so realistic in what's going on and everything! It gives us a longer and a more in depth explanation about the Boston Massacre. This passage provides lots of different parts of the Boston Massacre that the first passage doesn’t. Grammar can also play an important role in essays. Passage 2 uses stronger and more efficient words making it seem more realistic, appeared and in many more ways. Some examples of how this passage makes it seem better is, ‘’ A gush of smoke had overspread the scene, it rose heavily, as if it were loath or reveal the dreadful spectacle beneath it.
…show more content…
We’re not saying that passage 1 is bad and doesn’t state or say anything helpful, we’re saying that Passage 2 just has better quality than 1. Passage 1 has good evidence but Passage 2 has more in depth statings. Both of these passages provide good reasonings, but there will always be one better than another. And this is choosing passage 2 over 1!! Passage 1 doesn’t use any quotations such as when people are talking or acting in it like passage 2. Passage 2 uses many quotations for when people are talking and acting so it can give us a better feel and understanding of what's going on besides just stating it and going
Looking at the two different quotes you can see that they are a lot different. Looking at the books’ quote it is a lot more detailed and described
Revere segregates the Bostonians and British soldiers on opposing sides to illustrate the oppressed and the oppressor. Viewers constantly dart their eyes between the British and the Bostonians to analyze their contrasting characteristics. Revere excludes all Bostonians’ violence towards the British soldiers to stir up sympathy towards the Bostonians. Observers can see everything clearly to satisfy Revere’s desire of degrading the British reputation. The sharp buildings depict the exact location where the massacre took place.
This is important because Boston Massacre is a significant event that leads to the American Revolutionary War. It’s considered as a turning point of American’s quest to be independent. It helps galvanize the colonists to
Both sides agree on certain elements of the massacre, but yet they still have completely different interpretations on others, such as who actually gave the command to open fire. Where Wyatt and Preston both agree is rather limited in terms of the whole story. Both initially believed that that the bells that sounded while the riot was occurring meant there was a fire in the city and both learned around the same time that it was in fact a warning of a protest. They also agree that the crowd
Passage two of The Boston Massacre is better than Passage one of The Boston Massacre. Passage two has more details about the Boston Massacre than passage one. The way the soldiers and the young men speak is made to understand that it was in an older time instead of just being told. In passage one nothing was really explained but in passage two it was explained better. Passage two is better than passage one.
In two famous engravings of the Boston Massacre, Engraving of the Boston Massacre by Paul Revere and The Fruits of Arbitrary Power by Henry Pelham, viewers are given different views of the same event through the use of various artistic techniques. If one looks closer at these two engravings, it becomes apparent that there are differences between how two groups, American Colonists and British Troops, are presented as good, evil, or morally ambiguous. Through the use of various artistic techniques such as color, shading, facial expressions, and text, Revere and Pelham were able to achieve two different expressions and opinions of the same massacre. While Pelham’s engraving appears more neutral in tone, Revere’s engraving includes much more emotional appeal and
The passages they have many differences. In the second one it tanks more about her escape and does not wander into the subject of war. In the first passage it tells about the war and the escape. The authors differed in their perspective in writing. They both split in their style of writing.
This photo showed the Bloody Massacre Perpetrated in Kings Street in Boston” just 3 weeks after the Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. It is regarded by historians as an important document of the pre-revolutionary period. At the same time it is known to contain number of inaccuracies because the author used it as a propaganda piece to advance the cause of Independence The British are lined up and an officer is giving an order to fire, implying that the British soldiers are the aggressors. The colonists are shown reacting to the British when in fact they had attacked the soldiers British faces are sharp and angular in contrast to the Americans’ softer, more innocent features.
The Boston Massacre is an event that will continue to live in infamy for many years to come. The events surrounding the shot heard ‘round the world will forever be clouded in mystery, however; the examination of these events is critical to a larger understanding of the British and Colonial relationship. Unfortunately, like many historical events, there is no unified story on which historians agree. The documents integrated into this essay are a brief snapshot in time that can never represent a perfect history. For the purposes of this essay, I will focus on three major historical disagreements and attempt draw a conclusion on each aspect to hopefully provide an unbiased analysis of the Boston Massacre.
All of this figurative language helps with painting a picture in the readers head and the more the reader knows about your story, they will most likely they will like it more. It also shows how complex Quoyle is, there is so much information on him but yet as the reader we only know what he looks like, and what he does as a job. Annie Proulx's "The Shipping News" overall is a story about a man, (Quoyle) who is rejected by his family and is a failure in his own eyes, and his families. Diction is a help in this story because it helps the reader see that Quoyle is not really educated and comes from a small place. Details help paint a picture of what Quoyle really looks like or acts like, saying he can't swim, he has red hair and three jobs.
The evidence, from the 7 eyewitnesses, support that the colonists were the aggressors during the fateful evening of March 5, 1770, the Boston Massacre. Some cited evidence proves it. Number one, “I saw the people throw snowballs at the soldiers and saw a stick 3 feet long strike a soldier upon the right” (Theodore Bliss). In other terms they were assaulting the soldiers with pieces of snow or ice at them, afterward they hit one of them with a 3 foot club. This shows that the soldiers didn’t shoot to murder, they shot in self-defense.
I did not know that the British sent their military into Boston. It now Sorcinelli 2 makes sense to me why the people of Boston were so aggressive and agitated. The colonies were used to being self-governed during the 7 Years' War, and now they were suddenly being pushed around and ruled by the British. Reading the personal accounts was eye-opening, and interesting to hear exactly how it played out. It makes me very sad that the massacre led to the deaths of people, but I am overall grateful that it led to the American Revolution.
The boston massacre will forever be known in history. This battle occurred on March 5th, of 1770. Revere got to working on his masterpiece within days of the incident. The engravings that he made fueled the fire of the revolution itself. He showed the innocence throughout the colonists
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.