An Overview Of Canada's Exclusionary Rule
Canada: A Comparative approach
It seems fair that, following a critical analysis of the law in JC, another jurisdiction should be considered in order to facilitate a proper outlook on what may be needed, and what has worked elsewhere. This section is intended to outline the operation of the exclusionary rule in Canada.
The Canadian courts rely on legislative enjoined exclusionary rules that are justified by judicial integrity. This justification is given effect to by means of the application of a balancing test. In April 1982, Canada codified its exclusionary rule in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 24(2) in particular, provides for the exclusion of evidence in when “the admission of such evidence in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute”. In Canada, the maintenance of judicial integrity requires a consideration of the seriousness of the offence with which the accused is charged and the extent of the violation. Initially judges had little discretion whether to exclude evidence. This, clearly, made for a more robust rule. In R v Burlingham, The Canadian Supreme Court directed the exclusion of evidence if
…show more content…
The enormously significant decision of JC will have wide ranging implications in both the vindication of rights and the administration of justice in the near future. Despite it being the appropriate time to re-write the Kenny decision, it is clear that “the wrong move on evidence” has been made. While the criticisms of the JC case, will no doubt, be far and long lasting, I do believe there is a glimmer of hope in looking towards the Canadian position of R v Grant. However, this is not without its problems and could come in for some constitutional questioning if adopted. In the hope of achieving change, it is imperative that our courts adopt a more of assertive posture in the near future in setting down a balanced and workable exclusionary
Austin Trial Court Case Summary
160 Words | 1 PagesFollowing a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Larry Offutt (“Offutt”), appellant, was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, and related charges. On appeal, Austin presents three questions for our review, which we have rephrased as follows: 1. Whether the trial court erred by limiting cross-examination of a state’s witness regarding her involvement in an unrelated offense. 2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling an objection to the prosecutor’s statements on the grounds that the statements impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.
Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Youngstown Sheet And Tube Company
2406 Words | 10 PagesSince the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the Mapp case various other cases such as U.S v. Leon the “good faith” exception in 1984 and Nix v. Williams the inevitable discovery rule of 1984 have helped to modify the exclusionary rule handed down by the U.S Supreme Court stating that the original ruling interfered too much with the work of police officers (Pearson
Case Study: Burwell V. Hobby
1454 Words | 6 PagesBusiness Law Case Study Essay: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S (2014) Facts: The Green family runs and owns Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and skills chain that has over 500 stores and they have over 13,000 employees. Other facts of the case are that the Green family has been able to organize the business around the values of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company as told by Biblical principles, one of which is the belief that the utilization of contraception is wicked. Also, the facts show that under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), occupation -founded group health care plans must offer certain sorts of preventative care, for example, FDA-accepted contraceptive approaches.
Sauve V Canada Case Study
434 Words | 2 PagesSauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) (2002) Plaintiff - Richard Sauvé Defendant - Attorney General of Canada, Chief Electoral Officer of Canada & the Solicitor General of Canada FACTS The Plaintiff: Richard Sauvé is a former member of the biker gang ‘Satan’s Choice’. In 1975, Sauvé was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison for the murder of an opposing gang member. In 1993, Sauvé started a long journey fighting an injustice that denied all inmates the right to vote.
Racial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesOn the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.
Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule
513 Words | 3 PagesThe exclusionary rule is a deterrent against searches and seizures. Any evidence that is gained through an illegal search or seizure is now inadmissible in criminal proceedings, per the exclusionary rule. Supporters of the exclusionary rule argue that it helps prevent illegal searches and seizures against law enforcement. Those against the exclusionary rule argue that the exclusionary rule keeps criminals out of jail and there are other preventative measures such as suspending police officers without pay, dismissing them from a case, or in extreme circumstances terminating employment of officers who violate the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects all citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures from all government officials.
Hebert Packer Due Process Model
728 Words | 3 PagesIn this case the police came barging into Mapp’s house without a warrant. The police found many things in the house like pornography and other illegal things. However, the supreme court did not allow them to use that evidence because there was not a warrant so Mapp used something called the exclusionary rule. (Cole, 350) The exclusionary rule is when, “the principle that illegal obtained evidence must be excluded for a trail.
Elements Of A Fair Trial In Australia
559 Words | 3 PagesNew evidence will be revealed and will affect the jury’s decision and will either be unfair towards the defence, accused or the prosecution. Without this element in place, the judge will affect the jury’s decision and therefore, be unfair towards the sides. This is one of the elements that contribute to a fair trial.
Analysis Of Emily Murphy's Case: A Defining Moment For Canada
1526 Words | 7 Pages7)"The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Decisions." Henrietta Muir Edwards and others (Appeal No. 121 of 1928) v The Attorney General of Canada (Canada) [1929] UKPC 86 (18 October 1929). Accessed May 25, 2017.
Case Analysis: You Will Be The Judge
588 Words | 3 PagesYou Will Be The Judge Facts: The case involves a 12 year old child named Griffin Grimbly who told the teacher that he was beaten with a clothesline by his father Mr.Gimli. In court, the Mr.Gimli argued that he was devoted to Christian and was following the Biblical injunction on child rearing, “Spare the rod and spoil the child”, as well as arguing that s 43 of the criminal code gives parents the right to use “reasonable force” in disciplining their children. Issue: Is Mr. Grimbly is guilty of or not guilty of assault ? Held: Mr.Grimbly is guilty of assault.
Explain The Four Exceptions To The Exclusionary Rule
110 Words | 1 PagesThe exclusionary rule explain that collected evidence must not be a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights or else it could be inadmissible in court. The four exceptions to the Exclusionary rule are the Good-Faith exception, the Plain-View Doctrine, Clerical Errors Doctrine, and the Emergency Searches of Property. The exceptions are used to protect officers if they do something in good faith or in emergency. However these exceptions are only used to protect the officers who acted in good faith. This exceptions cannot help officers if they acted with malicious intent.
The Benefits Of The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms
1219 Words | 5 PagesBefore the Charter, many people may argue that Canada was a free and democratic country. Canadians had the freedom of expression, equality and the principles of fundamental justice. What changed with the creation of the Charter was that rights and freedoms were given constitutional status, and judges were given the power to strike down laws that infringed on them. In 1982, most Canadians agreed that the introduction of the Charter was going to monumental. But on the contrary, over 30 years later, numerous laws have been struck down by interpretation of the charter and remedial techniques that have been developed by courts.
Dietrich V Queen Summary
991 Words | 4 PagesHowever, the main affect this decision has on today’s society is the way justice must be carried out in the court of law and the way a person’s rights should be protected even if they’re guilty or
Discrimination In Canada
622 Words | 3 PagesThe Canadian Human Rights Act, as expected, does not condone discrimination relating to pregnancy. This is according to the Canadian Commission's official policy statement. Discrimination against pregnant women is considered to be a form of sex discrimination, since only women can become pregnant. Areas of discriminatory practices against pregnant women covered by this policy include: negative treatment, refusal to hire or promote, termination of employment, and harassment. Unfortunately, in Canada, like many other countries, many women who become pregnant are criticized when it comes to their place in society.
Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule
493 Words | 2 PagesThe exclusionary rule is a lawful principle that the United States use, which expresses that the confirmation that was powerfully utilized by the police can 't be utilized in a criminal trial. The motivation behind why this is done it’s for the security of the established rights. In addition, the exclusionary rule states that in the Fifth Amendment no one "should be denied of life, freedom, or property without due procedure of law." The exclusionary rule additionally expresses that in the Fourth Amendment it is intended to shield residents from unlawful pursuits and seizures. It also applies to the infringement of the Sixth Amendment, which ensures the privilege to counsel.
More about An Overview Of Canada's Exclusionary Rule
Austin Trial Court Case Summary
160 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Youngstown Sheet And Tube Company
2406 Words | 10 PagesCase Study: Burwell V. Hobby
1454 Words | 6 PagesSauve V Canada Case Study
434 Words | 2 PagesRacial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesArguments Against The Exclusionary Rule
513 Words | 3 PagesHebert Packer Due Process Model
728 Words | 3 PagesElements Of A Fair Trial In Australia
559 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Emily Murphy's Case: A Defining Moment For Canada
1526 Words | 7 PagesCase Analysis: You Will Be The Judge
588 Words | 3 PagesExplain The Four Exceptions To The Exclusionary Rule
110 Words | 1 PagesThe Benefits Of The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms
1219 Words | 5 PagesDietrich V Queen Summary
991 Words | 4 PagesDiscrimination In Canada
622 Words | 3 PagesArguments Against The Exclusionary Rule
493 Words | 2 Pages