Rich countries are also affected. In the world’s richest countries, 1 in 4 children are living in poverty. In the European Union, 26 million children are impoverished. Unicef ranks the top countries in the world, and in June of 2017, they determined that the United States ranks 37th of 41 countries for the greatest percentage of childhood poverty. This means that we are one of top five developed countries with the most poverty among the richest nations.
On the face of it, these concerns about livelihoods seem homogeneous to cases of xenophobia everywhere else in the world where people seek scapegoats for their deprivation. A popular group of leftist intellectuals in South Africa has argued that xenophobic violence is ultimately the consequence of economic decay and uneven development as a result of structural adjustment and deindustrialization (Bond et al. 2011; optically discern withal Tshitereke 1999;Harris 2002) They point out that the ANC government’s policies have sent unemployment rocketing from 13 percent in 1994 to 25 percent in 2013, or 40 percent by unofficial measures. According to the Economist, “half of South Africans under 24 probing for work retain none. Of those who have jobs, a third earn less than $2 a day.”5 Since 1994, the number of people living on less than one dollar a day has doubled, from 2 million to 4 million.
This paper is inspired by the two articles “Oman’s Diverse Society: Northern Oman” by J.E. Peterson and the second chapter of the book “Tanzania in Transition” by Kjell Havnevik. We live in a world where “the wealth of the one percent richest people in the world amounts to $110 trillion. That’s 65 times the total wealth of the bottom half of the world’s population” (Shin, 2014, para 2). Poverty is defined as the lack of basic human needs; and Africa is known to be the poorest continent, in which Tanzania is one of the poorest countries in that continent.
It’s a simple question that people have a lengthy complicated answer for. In simple terms racism is an excessive amount of hatred for a minimum reason. You may not think of it as much when you insult someone based on colour,religion, or culture but for them it may feel hurtful , for them it may feel like they don’t belong in this little community they may see faults in themselves when really it’s not them. Rather than showing a little fundamental of caring people choose to discriminate and victimise people, all which leads me to the question why? Why do people choose to do
Pakistan is a developing country day by day, and also facing poverty problems , nearly majority of Pakistan lives in below the poverty-line. According to UNDP- human development report (2008), Pakistan has been 136th position from 177 developing-countries. Nearly, 73% people struggling less than 2 dollar per day. If we position of the Asian countries on earning-poverty, Pakistan offer in last from all the Asian states. Throughout the last ten years ,Government of Pakistan spent compareingtrillions-rupees for poverty reduces programs.
While it is definitely difficult to eradicate conflict in a culturally diverse society, the true cause of conflict is not exactly diversity itself. Instead, it is caused by unacceptance and intolerance of different lifestyles, ethnic groups, religions, etcetera, leading to oppression and discrimination. However, people are not born naturally prejudiced towards others – this is instead cultivated and influenced by the people they are surrounded by. This goes to show that nation-states can gradually work towards achieving peace, but the pre-condition would be for the majority
Just as Haiti’s economy was starting to grow once again, the country was struck with the earthquake and perpetuated the cycle of poverty. It was estimated that the overall losses and damages caused by the earthquake were between $7 billion to $14 billion US dollars (149). The gross domestic product of Haiti shrunk 5.1 percent and even before the earthquake, Haiti was the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. There was about eighty percent of the population living below the poverty line and forty percent living in abject poverty (Haiti earthquake web). This is partly because Haiti come out of slavery through rebellion and became the first black republic in the world.
2.1 Introduction Poverty is a worldwide issue. All the nations around the globe face the issue of poverty, yet there are a few nations which are poorer than others like the developing nations in Africa, Asia and Latin America. The poorest person in a developed country may be better off than an average citizen of many developing countries. The defination of poverty differs in different regions around the globe. As indicated by the United Nations' Human Development Report 1996, the average per capita income of the poorest one-fifth of Americans was $5,814 per year in 1993.While in Tanzania, average per capita income was 580$ per year which is ten time less than that of the Americans .
According to Obadan and odusola (2001), reveal how sharply the per capital income of Nigeria skid from a high of over 1,280 dollars in 1980 to a low dollar in 1995. Nigeria situation become more deplorable when compared with other less enriched developing countries in Africa and other part of the third world. Finding by Kayode and Odusola (2002) shows, for example that Nigeria’s per capital income of $240 in 1990 was well below the average of over $500 for sub-Saharan Africa. Poverty in Nigeria, a country with over 140million people is all enveloping. The pest has also shown a rising bias the past couple accounting for the nations low development indicators and its ranking alongside the poorest nation in the world (united nation, 2001 and OXFAM, 2003).
Labor turnover and absenteeism increments are another disadvantage in a diverse workplace (Nadeem Iqbal et al., 2014). Workforce diversity increases labor absenteeism and turnover in the organizations for employee productivity and satisfaction. Employees who recognize themselves as valued associates of their organization are harder working, involved and inventive (Eugene Saltson et al., 2015). Unfortunately, minority-group associates often feel less valued than do majority-group members due to ethnocentrism, typecasting and prejudice (Badreya al-Jenaibi, 2011).The Mismanagement of diversity in the form of denied access or negative treatment can have undesirable significances, such as motivation and inhibiting