The tyrannical judgement toward citizens of Maycomb County was expressed by narrative conventions. It was not right that Tom Robison was judged by his skin colour. He was considered guilty as soon as Mayella said she was assaulted, but he was given a chance. The evidence proved Tom Robinson otherwise. Nevertheless, he was still considered guilty because he was a Negro.
These behaviors lead to segregation or racial discrimination. Racism is finally a hatred towards a group or a category of people. Segregation, racial discrimination are words that otherwise mean racism. To be racist is to refuse a man or a woman because of the color of his skin, his religion or his origins. There is so many types of racism.
I think that Tom should have been considered innocent until the Ewells could prove that he was guilty. Nevertheless, the jury believed that Tom was guilty because of the color of his skin. After much debate the jury of white men believed the two white witnesses over the black defendant. However, not the whole jury thought that Tom was guilty. One of the Cunninghams was on the jury and fought very hard for Tom’s side, according to Atticus.
These publications spark generalizations about whole groups and acceptable treatment of them by the dominant culture, which can be seen in racial profiling. By discriminating against groups based on dominant generalizations, the color line is strengthened, and thus racial and ethnic groups are treated inferiorly to whites. It is also crucial to view the theory from a minority’s standpoint and their role to fit into the
This shows how even though it was obvious that Tom would’ve won the case, it isn’t fair that they determined this by categorizing their race. It shows morality when Atticus acknowledges the fact that they are living in a racist world where the innocent could potentially be punished for an act that they did not commit to.
Racial Profiling Racial profiling is when law enforcement officials target individuals for suspicion of crime, based on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. Profiling is morally wrong. Profiling is a very dangerous.
Racism has deep roots in American history. Slavery, segregation, and unnecessary police charges are just a few examples of racism. But, why does racism exist? Many people believe that their race and ethnicity is superior than others, and that those who are “different” are inferior. Those who are considered, “inferior,” have to be treated differently, which results in unfairness and discrimination.
I agree with you that the matter of Tom shows the loss of innocence. Harper addresses the complex issues of categorizing people into different groups according to the physical traits such as skin color, hairstyle and some other biological differences between races. Tom reminds us about the two opposite sides regarding discrimination such as the people who don’t support racism to those who do. Tom Robinson characterized innocent blacks who were being threatened by the senseless prejudice that dominated the society that time. Scout wasn’t understood why Tom was imprisoned guilty.
Racial profiling is a tool used by law enforcement targeting an individual on suspicion of a crime, based on race, ethnicity or national origin. In order to create a solution for racial profiling, it must be addressed, not just in certain situations, but as a whole. Racial profiling which does not require the use of evidence is quite different from criminal profiling and is an unfair and ineffective way to judge someone. Eric holder once said "I don't want to talk about whether or not racial profiling is legal. Racial profiling is not an effective law enforcement tool."
According to Urban Institute, “ racial disparities also permeate the criminal justice system in the united states and undermine its effectiveness”( Sakala, 1). This evidence means that due to bringing up racial topics or are using racial disparities as a defense s an unfair case or act of justice for the colored due to his/her color of skin which means the Americans will have a higher chance to win in a case of justice. Another reason is “ At Urban Institute we examine how historical and ongoing public policies, institutional practices, and cultural narratives perpetuate racial inequalities and constraints mobility for communities of color” ( Sakala,1). This means that in any situation that colored people get in they could have their presence or just the mostly reason that is used which is their skin color to be held accountable for anything and really can’t defend
Racial profiling is morally wrong: I cannot stress this point enough racial profiling is morally and ethically wrong. It degrades the American psyche by treating its citizens as second class citizens. It generalizes,it paints with broad strokes that minorities are criminals and worthy of profiling. Not to mention that profiling by The United States is Hypocritical a country that promotes liberty,freedom and ideals of justice should not violate it 's citizens civil liberties,such as racial profiling does. Now,i will give a now famous example about racial profiling gone bad.
Unfair Representation from Racial Gerrymandering Racial gerrymandering is an issue that makes use of the tool of gerrymandering. The voting outcome depends on the process of gerrymandering, and the practice of racial gerrymandering has a negative impact on the views of the common people. Racial gerrymandering can favor a certainty party and cause an unfair direction for votes.
I think it is not okay to racially profile, but I also think it is okay in some cases because you are accusing someone for doing something by their appearance. Also There is no guarantee that the police will catch the criminal by racial profiling. There are lot of criminals that the police needs to catch and with racial profiling the police could kind a get the idea of who or what kind a person might commit a crime. It will help the police catch the criminal faster. Racial profiling can help the police in some ways and in some other ways it can not help the police and could just make it worser.
Racial profiling has become a worldwide epidemic. Within law enforcement circles and its practices, has become a contentious issue. It occurs every day, in cities and towns across the country, where law enforcement and private security target minorities without evidence of criminal activities. Law enforcement is responsible for humiliating and frightening these groups with: detentions, interrogations, and searches. It can be triggered based on perceived race, ethnicity, origin, or religion.