Racial Profiling Vs Iron Triangle

697 Words3 Pages
Racial profiling and the Iron Triangle - how are these two extremely different matters actually a part of a cause and effect relationship with each other? Although the connection is hard to see, the Iron Triangle could “move mountains” for those who face racial profiling regularly. The Iron Triangle can be described as the term used to describe the dynamics of policy-making between Congress, special interest groups, and governmental agencies (Iron Triangle Examples, n.d.). Therefore, couldn’t there be policies passed to prevent these types of encounters where younger black gentlemen are targeted for stealing, or Arabic women are seen as suspicious on an airplane? The Iron Triangle, and those involved in it, can better help protect minorities from profiling by observing cases involving the issues, involving popular people to provoke better involvement, and by producing policies to prevent racial profiling as a whole. Racial profiling has been going on for centuries to most - if not all - races and ethnic groups. However, after certain circumstances such as the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States turned greatly against those…show more content…
Personally, I believe that if more of the higher class and wealthy were involved in the interest groups, the groups could obtain more followers/group members and get more policies passed - policies that Americans want. Celebrities, such as Chris Rock, and even our current president, Barack Obama, have faced racial profiling throughout their lifetime; even during their moments of fame. These very well-known people could easily be involved in the Iron Triangle process of eliminating racial profiling due to their previous experiences. It’s safe to say that fame doesn’t stop people from seeing you as your color, and I wouldn’t be surprised if celebrities and presidents alike would fight for the freedom from racial suppression and
Open Document