Rawls affirms that “there are two basic principles that define a “just” society” (p. 117). These two concepts are the liberty principle and the difference principle. The liberty principle states that “we should all be willing to agree to a system of rules which guarantees each person the free exercise of basic liberties” (p. 117). On the other hand, the difference principle states that there should be a “fair equality of opportunity” (p. 117). Nonetheless, our criminal justice system should have both of these principles, instead it is inequitable.
It is ethical in most case to consider the nature of the crime committed as opposed to pre-trying the victim because he or she belongs to a certain group, (Weitzer, 2005) Detailed Outline: 1. Profile policy Profile policy as stated in the previous sections mainly deals with the selective discrimination of a group of persons basing on their race, religion color as well as social status, (Ingram, 1998). 2. Ideas for presentation relating profiling as a policy The main aspect that falls under profiling mainly relates to the law enforcers as well as a dominant group in a certain region. This usually involves sidelining of individuals who are being treated differently, (Tuch, 2005).
These are fabulous steps, however they are not a panacea. More must be done to execute new advancements in policing and different parts of the equity framework that will enhance police responsibility and diminish the extent to which the harshest parts of criminal equity fall excessively on groups of shading. The United States needs to grasp a more brilliant way to deal with criminal equity that perceives that the affinity to concentrate on race is not the response to make safe groups. The inability to guarantee that our legal and legitimate frameworks treat all Americans just as has isolated an excess of our groups. We must offer voice to the honest to goodness and across the board worries about trust in the criminal equity process.
However, the liberal and progressive organizations that usually would have protected the civil liberties of the victims of McCarthyism backed down from the task. Although numerous Americans were disturbed and troubled by McCarthy’s allegations, there was an absence of effective outlets for them to express their opposition. Therefore, liberals and progressives merely did not mount a campaign against McCarthyism nor did they defend the victims’ civil liberties, or when few tried, it was not effective. Schrecker argues, “The destruction of the front groups and the left-led unions may well have had a more deleterious impact on American politics than the decline of the (Communist) party itself.” (Schrecker 105). This is because, as seen in the example of McCarthyism, with the demise of the left-led unions and organizations, the nation lost the network that created a public space where legitimate alternatives to the status quo could be presented.
In conclusion, the idea of racial profiling and the issues on racism in today’s society calls attention to sustain peace and ethnic equality within communities all across the nation and around the world. It is important to acknowledge that the main solution to change the issues on racial profiling and racism is among the duties of government authorities, law enforcement officials, and the people of a nation. Everyone, of any race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or authority needs to understand that our voices and actions are capable of fixing the issues of racial injustice into a more fair environment to all people of color. Therefore, it is up to our knowledge and actions to help people understand that the solution to obtain racial equality
The justice system is an extensive process in order to successfully sentence offenders fairly on all levels of crime or to exonerate the innocent persons. I strongly believe that when viewing the criminal system as whole it is quite effect in spite of it 's downfalls and criticism. Considering the extensive length and the many different court dates of accession in court alone helps to do just that. Also, ethics and discretion of the hard working people in the justice system provides an overall fair and unbiased system across the board. The strength and effectiveness comes in numbers and individuals of different beliefs and backgrounds, thus enabling the elimination of bias.
Often time, the guards, the prisoners , and even their families sometimes struggle with trying understand what their role really is in the prison system . Quite often the correctional officers are blamed for high rates of reoffending as well as psychological damage to the inmates. I believe that using corrections officers as culprits for the way the prisons are in America is an ill-advised method for the penal system to use. If I were the person in charge of making a difference in the way corrections were carried out in the future of the prison system, I would first clearly set expectations for the people who I consider to be both an authority figure of management and persons in charge of the reforming these inmates. Reform inside of prisons
In Conclusion, police officers are supposed to treat everyone the same no matter their skin pigment but police discrimination/racism will never go extinct In all honesty, police officers are going to continue to composed policies to target African Americans. Also they are going to keep blacks off the street by continuing to slay us off or by throwing us in confine. I have told you my opinion on police’s treatment toward blacks, so do you suppose police officers treat African Americans like other people from separate races?
It is important to study the deviants and the social structural contexts that define them. It is possible to make standard legal definitions. Alternatives define crime in terms like the type of victim and type of offender, object of the crime or the method of criminal activity. Definitions cover one or more of the standard legal definitions. Organized crime and criminal changes over time.
The question is to research the Megan Law based on the ideal characteristics of criminal law. Is Megan Law a good law? In my opinion, no law is perfect, but our laws are made to protect the people, for instance, politicality is the infringement of our state rules and is considered a good law. This law makes it mandatory in almost every state that sex offenders register. The law of specificity provides a strict definition of certain acts.