Rainsford, Montresor, Walter Palmer, And The Sniper
Rainsford, Montresor, Walter Palmer, and the Sniper all killed. Rainsford was the most justified in killing his enemy. My reasons are self defense General Zaroff was a murderer, and sailors would get trapped. My first reason is Gen. Zaroff would commit acts of homicide and manslaughter, and tried to kill Rainsford On page (29) “Tonight,” said the general, “we will hunt You and I” which would insinuate that Gen. Zaroff is going to kill Rainsford Or he would get maimed and tortured by Ivan, so Rainsford killed Zaroff in self defense. My second reason is that Zaroff killed people. On page (25-26) Gen. zaroff described his perfect animal humans. That was one of the main reasons that Rainsford killed Gen. Zaroff. My concluding reason is that
Similarities Between Rainsford And General Zaroff
287 Words | 2 PagesThe definition of murder is “to kill someone unlawfully and with premeditation.” I think Rainsford murder General Zaroff. I think he did because there was no reason to return to the mansion and kill Zaroff except to exact revenge. Rainsford had already escaped Zaroff, although there was really
Summary Of Rainsford Vs General Zaroff
249 Words | 1 PagesSanger Rainsford stays intrepid, fighting and feinting until he finds his way to the precipice of the island. Unflinching, he leaps into the Caribbean Sea, later meeting the General for a duel to the death. Rainsford is victorious, but he didn’t win.
The Most Dangerous Game Rhetorical Analysis
364 Words | 2 PagesRainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. During the time Rainsford is in Zaroff’s house they have a conversation about hunting. Zaroff tells Rainsford about him hunting humans. Rainsford says, “I can’t believe you are serious, General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke...........
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff
314 Words | 2 PagesGeneral Zaroff was born a Cossack and was known for their savagery. General Zaroff got bored with just hunting animals he wanted some great to kill- humans. Rainsford found out and refused to hunt with him, so General Zaroff decided to hunt Rainsford. Rainsford outsmarted him and had a fight to the death which Rainsford won. But you got to ask yourself.
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Justified
253 Words | 2 Pagesbut no animal can reason”(Connell 6).This states that no animal is able to fit all of the 3 characteristics. This adds along to the claim that he was not justified in killing General Zaroff because an animal didn't fit the requirements so instead Rainsford was looking for something that does reason. But as a general rule most people who want something bad enough they will work until they
Why Is General Zaroff Justified
217 Words | 1 PagesImplying the Gen. Zaroff is going to kill Rainsford, so Rainsford killed Zaroff in self defense. My second reason is that Zaroff killed people. On page (25-26) Gen. Zaroff described his perfect animal humans. That was one of the main reasons that Rainsford killed Gen. Zaroff. My last reason is that no more sailors would be lured to the thought of safety by a lighthouse which is described on page (26-27) of how sailors
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing Zaroff
249 Words | 1 PagesI think what pushed Rainsford into killing Zaroff was that he felt as though he had no choice to to kill him or be killed. When the author states “Rainsford did not smile. “I am still a beast at bay,” he said, in a low, hoarse voice.” in page 42, I think that sentence kind of summarize exactly that. I don’t think what Rainsford did would be considered murder to a certain extent.
Why Is General Zaroff Justified
303 Words | 2 PagesRainsford Killed General Zaroff Rainsford was the most justified in killing his enemy. He was more justified, because General Zaroff bought an island just to hunt people. Zaroff first helped them by feeding them, giving them new clothes, and letting them stay in his house, and sleep in his bedrooms, that he had in his mansion. After a few weeks later by letting them stay in he will tell them that he will hunt them down and use their head as a trophy by the success he made. Zaroff had killed many innocent lives, just for the fun of it.
Rainsford As A Hero In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connel
506 Words | 3 PagesIn the exposition of the plot, Zaroff told him he hunted “scum of the earth” humans and gave Rainsford an option to either hunt with him or be hunted; Rainsford refused to hunt, even though it meant almost certain death, for he believed it was wrong. “Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder… I will not hunt,” (225-228). He wouldn’t murder innocent people, even if they were poor, unwanted men; this shows he is a good man who care’s about every human’s
Themes In The Scarlet Ibis
600 Words | 3 PagesAt the end of the story, Rainsford trapped Zaroff and ended up killing him. These challenges that were thrown at Rainsford made him stronger because he learned a lot of new things and he achieved many
Fear Of The Huntie In Most Dangerous Game, By Richard Connell
766 Words | 4 PagesBut in the short story Zaroff said to Rainsford,”Tonight said the general we hunt-you and I”(Connell Pg 228)This was a real eye opener because Rainsford is a hunter but yet now he the huntie because General Zaroff is planning on hunting him. It’s not just animals the are being hunted now it is everyone even the humans and if human are being hunted the there is no real top of the line hunter. General Zaroff doesn't even feel bad about it because he believes that he is strong and that all the rest of the humans are weak. He says that the weak is made to pleasure the strong, so he uses hunting people as pleasure for himself.
Most Dangerous Game Movie Comparison
440 Words | 2 PagesAlso, General Zaroff is an extreme hunter and doesn’t find pleasure in hunting regular animals. Zaroff says the most dangerous game is humans because they have the ability to reason. Rainsford is going to be hunted and is given a certain amount of time to survive. Moreover, while Rainsford is being hunted Zaroff
Sanger Rainsford Character Analysis
624 Words | 3 Pages“‘You have won the game.’ Rainsford did not smile. ‘I am still a beast at bay…’Get ready General Zaroff’” (20) He doesn’t kill Zaroff for any reason other than revenge. By beast at bay Rainsford is saying he doesn’t have anywhere to go, so he wants to fight Zaroff, until someone dies which is ironic because Rainsford states that he is against killing another human being when he first meets Zaroff at the beginning of the story.
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Analysis
662 Words | 3 PagesRainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because Zaroff wanted to
Fear Exposed In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game
824 Words | 4 PagesRainsford was repealed by the fact that Zaroff kills humans for fun. Consequently, Rainsford
More about Rainsford, Montresor, Walter Palmer, And The Sniper
Similarities Between Rainsford And General Zaroff
287 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Rainsford Vs General Zaroff
249 Words | 1 PagesThe Most Dangerous Game Rhetorical Analysis
364 Words | 2 PagesWas Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff
314 Words | 2 PagesWas Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Justified
253 Words | 2 PagesWhy Is General Zaroff Justified
217 Words | 1 PagesWas Rainsford Justified In Killing Zaroff
249 Words | 1 PagesWhy Is General Zaroff Justified
303 Words | 2 PagesRainsford As A Hero In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connel
506 Words | 3 PagesThemes In The Scarlet Ibis
600 Words | 3 PagesFear Of The Huntie In Most Dangerous Game, By Richard Connell
766 Words | 4 PagesMost Dangerous Game Movie Comparison
440 Words | 2 PagesSanger Rainsford Character Analysis
624 Words | 3 PagesWas Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Analysis
662 Words | 3 PagesFear Exposed In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game
824 Words | 4 Pages