The American Scholar and American Exceptionalism Ralph Waldo Emerson’s oration The American Scholar is a speech about the role he sees for the United States in the world and an example of American Exceptionalism. In this oration, delivered before the Phi beta Kappa Society, at Cambridge Massachusetts, on the 31st of August 1837, Emerson uses the Scholar as an abstract for the United States as a nation. The function and importance attributed to the scholar by Emerson mirrors the function Emerson sees for the United States as a whole. Just as the scholar must be an example to society, the United States must be one for the world. The oration is divided into five parts. Each part describes an aspect of the true scholar and, therefore, a goal that …show more content…
The first such indication of American exceptionalism can be found in the title given to the oration. In his speech, he refers to ‘the scholar’ seventeen times, but only twice does he speak directly of the ‘American scholar’. Despite this fact, the title of his oration is not simply “The Scholar”, but very distinctly contains the word “American”. This choice of title already indicates that the American scholar is distinguished from other scholars, simply by being American. In her book Peacemakers, Margaret Macmillan states the following about American …show more content…
Emerson makes a point of addressing the importance for the scholar to not only gain knowledge beyond that of the past, but also to actively share this new found knowledge with the society and the world. This sharing of knowledge must be done in order to return the world to its original state of unity. By naming his oration The American Scholar and not simply the scholar, Emerson creates a stress on the word American. This stressing of the word American implies that being an American scholar, and not simply any sort of scholar, is
The American identity has evolved over time. During the 1700’s, the Enlightenment, also known as the Age of Reason, occurred. It spread rapidly across Europe, and then to North America. This revolutionary way of thinking was crucial to the development of the American identity. The Enlightenment was the period for cultivation of science and human reason.
Benjamin Franklin Even before America was founded on July 4, 1776, there were many people who already embodied what was portrayed as an american. One of the first true americans was Benjamin Franklin. He was not only an early politician, diplomat, author, scientist, inventor, and founding father, but also a great leader to the american people. He was so well known and respected, he is on the one hundred dollar bill. Franklin contributed a lot of things during his lifetime.
You asked me to define "The American" and whether or not founding fathers like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Payne, and Thomas Jefferson were the pioneers of the idea. The first major problem with this question is that Thomas Payne definitely wasn't American, after all, he was kicked out post-revolution for subversive ideas such as "Women Rights", "Banning Slavery", and "Atheism". The other hero here, Benjamin Franklin, was well aged by the countries actual founding. In fact he was eighty-three while attending as a delegate for the constitutional convention.
Exceptionalism of America can actually be dated back to the 1830s when United States and the citizens were first described as "Exceptional" by Alex de Tocqueville. He was the first to use the term in his Democracy in America class work. Tocqueville observed egalitarianism in the American society and stressed individualism which he indicated differed from "group ties" emphasis which characterizes Europe. The notion of American Exceptionalism sets America as having a distinct as well as special destiny that other nations do not posses, the notion has been persistent al all times in the American history. This special character, American Exceptionalism, is sometimes inferred from the 1776-89 period founded American political institutions.
Alfred Bester says that there are two threads to his view of American Exceptionalism: one based on Seymour Martin Lipset and another on Frederick Jackson Turner.1 He says that Martin Lipset said that the United States is exceptional because it came out of a "revolutionary event" that set up America as "the first new nation" and built a vision for the future on the ideology that caused them to break with England in the first place.2 He says that Turner thought that because the U.S. had a lot of unclaimed land that regular people could own land and not have to depend on anyone else. This means that there wouldn’t be an aristocracy and that small land-owners stuck to the values of the Revolution.3 The combination of what Lipset and Turner said
When Ronald Regan referenced John Winthrop’s “City Upon a Hill”, he described it vaguely, saying it was tall and strong, god-blessed and wind-swept. But what about the values of this city and the people that lived there? The Puritan presence in America did not simply end with the failure of Winthrop’s vison for a Puritan utopia, the ideas put forward in that continued to be a pervasive presence in America in the years to come, and still influence America today. Puritan morals played a crucial role in developing American mindsets and prejudices. Puritan ideals were based of the ideas that puritans must be individual, and individuality begat exceptionalism.
He demonstrates diction when he relays words like “providence” (3), “soul” (1), and “majesty” (1), to substantiate the idea that everyone has a destiny to become a better person, and that god is the ultimate protector. This enables people to be fierce as a lion in making their thoughts, beliefs, and actions their own. In Waldo Emerson’s essays titled “self-evidence”, he uses many rhetorical strategies and sentence structure to allow his readers to understand the importance of being true to who you are, not who others want you to be. One can only achieve the act of greatness, if they rise above the average thinking, and make their thoughts extraordinary.
The documents that were made available represent two very different understandings of American Exceptionalism. In the book American Exceptionalism: How the United States Became the Last Super-Power, Alfred Bester says that “American Exceptionalism is very real” and that it has two parts. First he explains how Seymour Martin Lipset said that because the United States was “created through an explosive revolutionary event,” the only way they could make their nation legitimate was through “strict adherence to the ideological commitments to liberty, equality, and democracy that lay at the nation’s roots.” He then explains how Frederick Jackson Turner said that because the nation possessed “vast tracts of unclaimed land,” everyday people could become
Nadine Sia SOC-1 Professor Thompson November 10th, 2015 You Just Don’t Understand This article was about the difference between how men and women perceive conversation. He opens up with a conversation that both parties took very differently than the other. He then goes on to explain more differences, such as status vs. support, independence vs. intimacy, advice vs. understanding, etc.
What does it mean to be an American today? Or rather, what does being an American entail? Does that pertain to a certain individual’s perspective? Or is Americanism defined through a collective consciousness projected around the world? Over the course of time, Americans have gone through various embodiments of who they are, without loosing the essence of what they represent.
Ralph Waldo Emerson uses multiple rhetorical devices such as metaphors, analogies, and allusions to argue his main point. The idea that one must rely on themselves and achieve greatness alone is told within these devices. The use of allusions in Emerson’s essay creates deeper understanding whilst supporting his point. These allusions cause the thought that if these historic people could achieve greatness despite nobody believing in them at first, you may be able to do the same. There are also analogies in this essay, mainly speaking about society’s disapproval about individuality and acceptance of conformity.
American Exceptionalism was coined by Alexis de Tocqueville in his book Democracy in America. To illustrate how the American way of thought is superior to the other ways of the world, Tocqueville expresses that the American way of thought is distinctively unique and special. This distinction is exemplified through liberty, egalitarianism, individualism, populism, and Laissez-Faire Economics. These qualities prove America’s exceptionality and difference from other countries. Although American Exceptionalism originated in the early 1800s, the idyllic values Tocqueville paints in his book can be seen throughout American history.
That’s a fairly simplistic notion and the focus of my essay explores whether this literal interpretation can still apply in today’s more complex society or whether being an American requires more than that. As I try to answer this question myself, I began first by trying to inventory the things I appreciate most about America. I quickly determined that the things I cherish most might be quite different than my other classmates, friends, and possibly my own family and that’s when I realized that the discretion to express your own ideas and to think
American currencies, specifically coins, have two sides: a head and a tail. The head and tail are different, yet they are still part of the same coin. Two American authors, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Nathaniel Hawthorne, represent two sides of the same coin: Transcendentalism. Transcendentalism swept through America as a new worldview in the 1900’s. Transcendentalism is a philosophy that asserts the primacy of the spiritual and transcendental over the material, that deals with aspects of nature.
By that, he believed in the individual over the institution, which was a very dominant Transcendentalist trait. In 1837, Emerson was invited to deliver the address ‘The American Scholar’ at Harvard, which was one of the most influential American speeches made at his time. It consists of 45 paragraphs you can divide into five different sections. In the first seven paragraphs, he introduces his intention, which is to explore the scholar as one function of the