Raskolnikov is often wrapped up in his thoughts to a point where he ends up wandering aimlessly, blocking out his surroundings, and getting lost in real life which in turn makes him forget what he was first so caught up in. Even when he 's filled with determination, he would sometimes still lose his direction, this for me correlates to Strakhov 's quote about "life in theory versus life in practice." Life in theory can seem one way, but in practice end up completely different. Strakhov states that both struggle within a man 's heart and this internal struggle that Dostoevsky makes transparent for the reader, does depict a "nihilist suffering in a deeply human way" (485). It 's interesting how this struggle manifest itself in Raskolnikov 's. How the reader understands him versus how the other characters understand him reminds of the saying that things aren 't always how they seem on the …show more content…
The statement "victory was won by life," is interesting to me and I 'm not entirely sure I understand it. Sometimes we look for reasoning and signs in the real world that may justify our theories, and in Raskolnikov case this is what happened. Life seemed to offer him many opportunities in the form of coincidences that served in giving him the final push, and in that push he was too caught up in the moment to over think anything or talk himself out of it, he was finally committed. In my understanding this phrase means to just accept what has, or will happen. Life goes on, as the saying goes, and there is victory in just being able to move forward no matter in which direction; to go and continue
In the article “Losing: An American Tradition” the author Charles M. Young argues that there is no such thing as a gracious winner: when a person wins, they receive praise, and praise inevitably leads to an egotistical person. Young also argues that thriving as a loser is shameless: if you are still considered an underdog, but everyone can see that you are trying your hardest, then technically you are winning as a loser and shouldn’t be ashamed of it. Young’s first altercation is that Americans hate losing. He supports this by saying, “Americans love a winner, and will not tolerate a loser.
Our Influences: Our Choices Nathan Bedford was not born a racist. Raskolnikov was not born a murderer. If Nathan Bedford was born into a union family, he likely would not have started the KKK. If Raskolnikov wasn’t born into his family or did not have the same influences, he would likely not have murdered two innocent women. But both these figures like John Jay and Razumihin had a choice, and they disregarded their integrity and chose to follow negative influences, as opposed to positive examples.
Before he had isolated himself by choice, but now it’s as if he doesn’t have an option anymore. Raskolnikov has done something so wrong that he no longer feels like a member of humanity, which is why he specifies a “human word”. Raskolnikov’s guilt comes from the need to rejoin society. That is why his guilt fluctuates so much, but becomes much worse when his rationale for the murder is put into question. In part 3 chapter 6, Raskolnikov has a dream, in which he tries to kill Alyona but fails and she laughs at him.
Shukhov reveals how he survives the day in and day out in the gulag. In One Day In The Life Of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Shukhov is in the gulags for being wrongfully convicted of treason. He must deal with the destruction of humanity, created a ritualization for eating, and most important, he treats time as a valuable possession. To begin with, Shukhov makes sure that he keeps his dignity despite the destruction of human solidarity that the forced labor camps. For example, This quote refers the lack of solidarity caused by the gulags, because for the lack of food, dignity, and the harsh weather. ”
Sansom writes, “He faces his mortality and realizes the failure of constructing a life on preferences and abstract relationships” (421). Shallow relationships and a focus on outward appearance lead to a neglect of Ivan’s actual purpose. In this time of Ivan grappling with death, Tolstoy proposes the idea that before we die “the choice is not how to act in ways so that we can control our death and question the meaning of life, but whether there is a reality to which we can find real value as individuals that is not nullified by the existential syllogism” (Sansom 424). The control that he sought as a way to defend himself against chaos does not lead him to peace; instead, it disappoints him and helps move Ivan to a place of deeper understanding. At the very end during an interaction with his son, Ivan finally “empties himself of meaningless false images of human purpose, [and] he then sees how to respond honestly with integrity to his destiny” (Sansom 427).
In Hillenbrand’s gruesome novel, Louis Zamperini faces the toughest of challenges, some that are purely indescribable and difficult to comprehend for the average human, but his ability to persevere and accomplish the unheard of demonstrates his character’s ability to tackle adversity head on. After a victorious landing on a Japanese island, the men are transferred to POW camps, where they assume they will face their deaths. Both men are taken special interest in, but Zamperini especially because of his Olympic past. Zamperini first meets the “Bird” at a new POW camp and realizes that a real life nightmare has entered his life. Zamperini, anxious and angry, is unsure of how to react, “Louie was on his own.
Raskolnikov 's act of violence is what causes him to go insane, impacts the lives of the people around him, and finally violence is Raskolnikov’s way of proving himself as an above-average individual. Dostoyevsky used violence to change the course of not only Raskolnikov’s life but also the lives of the people around him. The story shows how one man 's image of himself as a higher being can cause him to commit violent acts, which impact everyone around
The dream played a symbolic foreshadow of the murder that Raskolnikov commits in chapter VII. Fyodor Dostoevsky portrays Raskolnikov as a man of dilemmas. On one hand, the dream meant to foreshadow the murder of Alyona Ivanovna as the small horse killed for not being strong enough; on the other hand, Raskolnikov woke up with horror of his plan to murder Alyona and decides to not go through with it. The dream exposes Raskolnikov’s compassionate side. For example, the boy in the dream cries out against the drunkards to stop them.
Win or Lose As humans , we have to lose to win. Life may not always be fair or in our favor but we have to let it run its course. Regardless of how long it takes; devotion, spontaneity, and heart can bring forth an opportunity we would have never been. People can not sit in one place and do nothing and still expect to go somewhere.
How does one win and when has one lost? This question is not always clear-cut when applied to life and its many events, especially when a large portion of “happiness” or suffering is involved. When losing, one can learn important lessons that cannot be taught whilst winning and vice versa when winning. This is why it is one’s job to analyze the goings-on of everything they see or experience to discern whether those involved are actually winning or losing. How can one who has suffered so much still be a winner?
He uses descriptions of spaces in St. Petersburg to morph protagonist Raskolnikov’s mind and his surroundings into an indistinguishable amalgamation of confusion and claustrophobia, showing the Westernized city’s stifling effect on the internal workings of a traditional Russian man bombarded by new ideas. Dostoevsky focuses on St. Petersburg on the scale of individual rooms as opposed to full cityscapes. This use of space is most evident in his repeated descriptions of the cramped living quarters which act as barriers to Raskolnikov’s achievement of his full potential. At many points in the novel, Raskolnikov appears stuck in his own mind as well as in his physical space. The first description of his living-quarters immediately conveys this feeling of entrapment: “His closet was located just under the roof of a tall, five-storied house, and was more like a cupboard than a room.”
In the event that exclusive Alyona had been killed, this would have just been some genuinely necessary activity to the story. Be that as it may, when Raskolnikov murders Lizaveta too, Dostoevsky marks off everything except one reason creators slaughter characters (everything except closure plot inconveniences). Lizaveta's murder makes Raskolnikov have blame (thusly putting his character under anxiety). It is a demonstration that he does exclusively to ensure himself (I can't really point the finger at him, however) and subsequently causes him extraordinary pain. While I might want to think he would have encountered some blame if just the murder of Alyona had happened, I can't state for sure as I believe I don't have a clue about his character
He claims his intelligence is an affliction. He longs to be slapped in order to spend the rest of his life strategizing revenge, although he will never perform the narrative. Dostoyevsky urges readers to question the validity of an impenetrable wall. Dostoyevsky seems to be creating excuses for not making choices. He calls men of action stupid
Liza, for example, treasures the qualities of romantic love while the Underground Man is incapable of love. The Underground Man’s consistent theme of contradiction is exemplified throughout the story where he experiences a multitude of emotions ranging from narcissistic and egocentric to embarrassment and humiliation. Although the Underground Man envisions himself challenging those who have wronged him, he does not have the “moral courage” to stand up for himself. By remaining in the underground, the Underground Man is able to escape from reality where is able to manufacture his own world. An argument can be made that Dostoevsky used the personal aspects of the Underground Man to show the pattern of similarities between him and contemporary society.
Raskolnikov’s accumulating debt owed to his landlord prevents him from moving outside of Saint Petersburg and causes massive emotional damage. Each time he leaves his apartment, he fears seeing his landlady, The stress and anxiety arising from the debt he owes to his landlord causes him to become unruly and he had, “fallen into a state of nervous depression akin to hypochondria,” feeding into his detachment from society. Not only does Raskolnikov’s living situation seem grim, but his room itself furthers his emotional detachment from society. Raskolnikov’s room allows him to dehumanize himself.