ipl-logo

Ratifying The Constitution Pros And Cons

323 Words2 Pages

These past few years have been some troubling ones. Since the revolution and the ratification of the Articles of Confederation our country has been in a state of limbo. For every step forward our country attempts to make, we end up taking a giant leap back to where we began. Recently, our founding-fathers have taken part in a convention and have began discussing the idea of a new constitution- a new way of structuring our government. This constitution, however, has been lacking in support from some very crucial states due to the lack of a Bill of Rights, which would address the individual rights of a citizen. However, the Constitution, with or without the Bill of Rights, is currently crucial for the United States to ratify in order to ensure

Show More
Related

  • Primary Arguments Against Ratifying The Constitution Pros And Cons

    210 Words  | 1 Pages

    The primary argument against ratifying the constitution by the Anti-Federalists was that they imagined that the administration would be made would be too effective and they would simply be making ready for another government like the one that they had quite recently contended so energetically to free themselves from England. They likewise needed to include a Bill of Rights before endorsing the constitution and not afterward. The Pros are that the report had expressed to give trust against the unfeeling and unlawful demonstration of decision the american colonies. Freedom of development which is under Article IV. This area said the security and interminable associations and organization among the natives of the rose country.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    230 Words  | 1 Pages

    One last thing the constitution has that stopped tyranny rule was making sure the smaller states got a fair vote in congress compared to the bigger states. They had a meeting called the constitutional convention where they proposed two distinct plans. The first was the Virginia plan where they favored large states, and wanted it to be based off of population. The second one was the New jersey plan which favored small states, and gave each state an equal amount of votes. They eventually came up with the great compromise, where they proposed that congress would be composed of the senate, and the house of representatives.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution To Replace The Articles Of Confederation

    221 Words  | 1 Pages

    The United States should adopt the Constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation. The new Constitution provides many advantages and new opportunities. First, the Constitution gives more power to the national government in many ways. For example, under the Articles the national government had to ask the states for money, but under the Constitution the government is provided with money and the power to tax. In addition, the Articles allowed states to regulate trade causing each state to tax one another's products.

    Read More

  • Objections To The Constitution Pros And Cons

    322 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. The Constitution originally lacked a Bill of Rights. George Mason from Virginia presented a proposal to add a bill of rights to the document. But his offer was voted down.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation Constitution

    264 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitution came to fruition as an answer for the issues and numerous shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation. Not every person concurred with the Constitution or even the said issues emerging from the Articles of Confederation. These people were called Anti-Federalists and their thoughts would not be as effective as the thoughts of the Federalists, since Anti-Federalist thought's reflected numerous qualities of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution should have been endorsed with a specific end goal to conjure change and solvethe issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists had the plans to make the country the best is could be, and also sufficiently giving rights to citizens.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Patrick Henry

    564 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even if ratification is in place there should be a Bill of Rights so citizens don’t abandon their rights. “The necessity of a Bill of Rights appears to me to be greater in this government than ever it was in any government before” In my opinion the government should be strong enough to bring justice to criminal acts, defend the country and still have the rights of citizens abandoning their rights to absolute power. I am in between two different beliefs because, maybe we need a government that instills order, peace and can win a war, but also a limited government to where everything in a state or place isn’t made with

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    Constitutional Convention The beginnings of the Convention (pre-constitution) began when Governor Edmund Randolph of Virginia presented and defended a plan for a new structure of government (called the "Virginia Plan") that had been chiefly drafted by fellow Virginia delegate, James Madison. The Virginia Plan called for a strong national government with both branches of the legislative branch apportioned by population. The plan gave the national government the power to legislate "in all cases in which the separate States are incompetent" and even gave a proposed national Council of Revision a veto power over state legislatures. Delegates from smaller states, and states less sympathetic to broad federal powers, opposed many of the provisions in the Virginia Plan.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the Revolutionary War the thirteen colonies wanted a government to replace the British system they wanted overthrown. So they came up with the Articles of Confederation. The articles went into effect in 1781, but were short lived because they had too many flaws in them to work effectively. Even though they went into effect there was still a problem the colonies had and that was that they had no real national leadership.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are countless Arguments both for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. Some of the main arguments of the Federalist include that a strong National government offered protection for the people’s rights, the government would benefit from a 3 branch system and a system of checks and balances needed to be created. Some of the main ideas of the anti-federalist were that the National Government would have too much power, a Bill of Right needed to be added, the constitutions effect of the government would be too tyrannical, and that the federal court system would be too powerful. Considered the Father of the Constitution, James Madison was detrimental in the creation In the US Constitution.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the ratification of the Articles of Confederation in 1781, a sense of nationalism and unity swept across the young United States of America. Unfortunately, with youth, comes inexperience. It did not take long for numerous problems to be noticed under the Articles including a weak central government, no national judicial system, and little coined money. Due to the controversy and disorder arisen by the Articles of Confederation, the delegates of the United States joined for the 2nd Constitutional Convention in 1787 to make reparations. The top scholars of the nation intended to repair the existing government but instead, created a whole new one.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

    543 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Constitutional Convention, a meeting of state delegates from May of 1787 to September 1787, resulted in the creation of a new constitution and therefore a new government for the United States of America. While representation was debated over at the Constitutional Convention, issues that created much more controversy were the distribution of power between branches, and between state and federal governments. Under the Articles of Confederation, representation in the national government was satisfactory, however the creation of a national government that welded a significant amount of power changed how each state wanted to be represented in the national government. Delegates, mainly from the larger New England states, at the Constitutional Convention were concerned over the matter of how small states were represented when compared with large states. As many plans suggested, representation based on population favored the larger states, and also the states with a higher percentage of

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

    990 Words  | 4 Pages

    The result of this victory enabled the following event to transpire: the Constitutional Convention. In 1787, four years after the American Revolution ended, George Washington and fellow influential people met in Philadelphia. The before them was imperative to the newly independent nation’s success. The newly formed Government needed to replace the Articles of Confederation, which had been hastily put together after the American Revolution. There needed to be a permanent and binding document that would unify the states as opposed to individual state power.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

    461 Words  | 2 Pages

    All the states except one, Rhode Island, signed the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution was ratified in 1781. It was needed because it had made America’s Government, set basic laws, and had some important rights that it granted for its citizens . The Articles of Confederation was America’s first governing document, it was very weak and gave the states to much power and allowed them to act independently. In the Articles of Confederation gave Congress way to much power but since the states were so free it could not enforce anything.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The American Constitution

    1706 Words  | 7 Pages

    David Waldstreicher, an American historian, has claimed that the American Constitution is a ‘”pro-slavery’” document in his article published in 2015. In Waldstreicher's article and Sean Wilentz article also published in 2015 they both state that the Constitution refused to mention slavery as property and according to Abraham Lincoln in Wilentz’s article “Lincoln asserted that the framers had operated ‘on purpose to exclude from the Constitution the idea that there could be property in man’”. The American Constitution is a pro-slavery document that even though not wholly stating components within it that would entirely abolish slavery, but it also would not say that humans cannot be determined property. The U.S. Constitution is a pro-slavery

    Read More

  • The Constitution Pros And Cons

    906 Words  | 4 Pages

    During and immediately after the Revolutionary War, the founding Fathers of America sought to establish a republic on a scale never seen before and to do so had to experiment with new laws and political ideas. Though it was obvious that the first law of the land, The Articles of Confederation, were too weak for the new nation, the development of the new constitution in the late 1780s sparked fierce political debates over the power of the new central government. Even during the debate over the new constitution, it was merely political factions fighting over ideas of government. It would not be until Washington’s first term in office that actual political parties emerged. It was the differences between Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton,

    Read More

More about Ratifying The Constitution Pros And Cons

Open Document