An irreversible, spontaneous and homogeneous reaction was researched at an ambient temperature of 22.7°C. The specific reaction is given in Equation 1. CH_3 COOCH_2 CH_3+ NaOH →CH_3 COONa+CH_3 CH_2 OH (1) It is necessary to determine the reaction kinetics for the reaction in Equation 1. Reaction kinetics is an unavoidable stepping stone needed for reactor design and optimising these reactors to their full potential. It is a measurement of how quickly a reaction occurs. The rate of a reaction is directly proportional to the reactant concentrations and the temperature of the reactor. (Schaller) The problem at hand is that the reaction kinetics is not known and need to be determined to understand the reaction more thoroughly. There is a hypothesis that the reaction kinetics is exactly the same for different types of reactors. The purpose of …show more content…
This is given in Equation 15. (dC_A)/dV=r_A/Q (15) Conductivity In the experiment the concentration of the mixture is measured by the means of a conductivity probe. The conductivity referred to in this case is electrical conductivity. This is the ability of ionised compounds to transfer electrical current in an aqueous solution. It is measured in units of mS/cm. (Heyda, 2006) There are only two compounds present that exhibits a conductivity reading and that is sodium hydroxide and sodium acetate. In this case the sodium hydroxide gives a higher conductivity reading than sodium acetate. Therefor it is preferred to take all the concentration measurements with respect to sodium hydroxide. The conductivity values can be used to calculate the conversion of sodium hydroxide. Sodium hydroxide is component B and due to the fact that conversion of B will be calculated, it is necessary to ensure that B is the limiting reagent. The relationship between conductivity values and conversion is given in equation 15. x= (K_START-K)/(K_START-K_FINAL )
The apparatus for the addition reaction under reflux was assembled. Magnesium (1 g) was weighted on a paper, and a few pieces of magnesium were crushed in order to activate the metal surface. Then, the round bottom flask was lowered away from the condenser, and the magnesium was added to it. After that, 10 ml of anhydrous diethyl ether was added in a round bottom flask by using the syringe, and the reaction flask was heated using a heating mantle to maximize the formation of the Grignard reagent. After 10 minutes of heating the mixture, the mixture changed color from clear to yellowish, and it turned completely Reddish brown after 12 minutes.
A hot plate was placed under the ring stand. 50 mL of 3.0 M NaOH in a 250 mL beaker and a stir bar was placed in the beaker. The beaker with NaOH was placed on the hot plate and 3.75 grams of NaAlO2*5H2O was placed in the beaker. The temperature probe was placed in the beaker with the solution, not touching the bottom of the beaker. The solution was heated and stirred till the solution dissolved.
The reaction was repeated 3 times and average rate noted. From these rates a graph was plotted which describes the relationship of the pressure produced and number of drops added. The reaction rates were measured by Kpa/min and were written to 4 figures for precise results. Time was measured by stop watch. Table 4 shows a summary of all the groups which participated in the lab session.
How is temperature related to this reaction? The higher the temperature the slower they move.
For Herbert Run the conductivity level was 687µS/cm. The Turbidity level was 0 FAU and the Nitrate level was 0.02ppm. I accept my hypothesis and reject parts of my hypothesis. I reject that both streams have a high turbidity level. Both streams’ turbidity level is zero.
The quantitative solubility of the unknown compound was determined to be 29/100ml. The known solubility of sodium sulfate is 28.11g/100mL water. Using the found solubility to compare to the known solubility of sodium sulfate. This solution created in the solubility test, the conductivity of the unknown compound was tested using an Ohmmeter to measure the resistance of the solution. Resistance is the measure of a substances ability to conduct
Goals The primary goal of this experiment was to identify an unknown compound by running various tests to determine the qualitative solubility, conductivity, and pH value of the compound. Tests were also performed for the presence of specific cations and anions in the compound. The second goal was to discover the reactivity of the unknown compound by reacting it with different types of substances. The third goal of this project was to calculate the quantitative solubility of the unknown compound in water.
We know that energy is constant therefore any heat lost by our reaction is transferred to the surroundings. I was not able to locate any literature values for the change in enthalpy, despite looking very extensively. Error Analysis: For this experiment I assumed that the specific heat capacity for all solutions was 3.853 J/g°C.
CH 204- Intro to Chem Practice Experiment 3-Enthalpy of Chemical Reaction Dana Lucas Robin Brown TA: Chris February 19, 2018 Introduction The purpose of this experiment was to calculate the change in enthalpy of 2 reactions using Hess’ Law by using a coffee calorimeter to measure the temperature changes in the sub reactions for MgO and a neutralization reaction. Germain Hess published this law in 1840, which described the first law of thermodynamics.
Abstract In this experiment, the reaction kinetics of the hydrolysis of t-butyl chloride, (CH3)3CCl, was studied. The experiment was to determine the rate constant of the reaction, as well as the effects of solvent composition on the rate of reaction. A 50/50 V/V isopropanol/water solvent mixture was prepared and 1cm3 of (CH3)3CCl was added. At specific instances, aliquots of the reaction mixture were withdrawn and quenched with acetone.
If one compares the amount of electrolytes present in an artificial substance (sports drink), to those in a natural substance (orange juice), then the natural substance will have the most electrolytes. That is my hypothesis. I chose this topic because I have always been skeptical about the validity of the quantity of electrolytes said to be in sports drinks. Sports drinks have been recommended as a way to replace electrolytes, which are lost during exercise. However, orange juice also has electrolytes and these are naturally occurring, not man made.
Question Do sports drinks have more electrolytes than orange juice? Variables Independent Variable: Type of Liquid Dependent Variable: The conductance of the liquid Controlled Variables: the amount of liquid, multimeter and supplies, temperature of the liquid, room, and supplies Hypothesis If I measure the conductance of each liquid, then the sports drink will have the greatest current, and the greatest amount of electrolytes. Materials Digital Multimeter
Moreover, the red open circles of figure XE represent the single channel current amplitudes recorded at different membrane potentials. In this condition, the fitted regression line yields a and a Vr respectively of 1 00 pS and of 0
The chemical equation for this experiment is hydrochloric acid + sodium thiosulphate + deionised water (ranging from 25ml to 0ml in 5ml intervals) sodium chloride + deionised water (ranging from 25ml to 0ml in 5ml intervals) + sulphur dioxide + sulphur. As a scientific equation, this would be written out as, NA2S2O3 + 2HCL + H2O (ranging from 25ml to 0ml in
The proportionality constant, R, is known as the resistance and is determined by both material properties (the intrinsic resistivity) and geometry (length and cross-sectional area of the active material). In equation form, Ohm’s law is: V = IR. It is important to understand just what is meant by these quantities. The current (I) is a measure of how many electrons are flowing past a given point during a set amount of time. The current flows because of the electric potential (V), sometimes referred to as the voltage, applied to a circuit.