Critical Appreciation Of A Doll's House

937 Words4 Pages
A Doll’s House is a short play by Henrik Ibsen. The plot revolves around a married woman, Nora Helmer, and how she borrowed money to save her husband, Torvald Helmer’s life when he was very ill. On a day before Christmas, Linde, Nora’s high-school friend and widow, visits as she is hoping to find a job. Nora tells Linde of what she has done as proof that she has been through rough times and still is until now because her husband is assigned bank director. Krogstad, the man that lend the money to Nora, is about to get fired by Torvald because of his infamous reputation at the bank. This causes him to threaten Nora and expose her secret to her husband unless he gets his job back. Nora tries many times to convince Torvald not to fire him but Torvald…show more content…
The play starts off by uncovering that Torvald has been offered a director’s position at the bank meaning that his paychecks and income is going to increase. Be that as it may, he still punishes Nora for her excessive spending and stating that they should be aware of their spending. The money also plays an important role in showing domestication of one character to the other. For example, in the introduction of the play, Torvald's capacity to manage the amount Nora spends on Christmas presents demonstrates his control over her. Another way character that is influenced by money is Mrs. Linde. Because her husband passed away, Mrs. Linde is in urgent need of getting money to be able to survive. However, with that being said, both Mrs. Linde and Nora cannot acquire expansive wages since they are ladies; their powerlessness to get to noteworthy measures of cash is one way that they are persecuted by the sexism of the time. Also, Krogstad is in desperate need of money as he might be losing his career at the bank. In the start of the play, Nora is pleased with the way that she "raised" the cash for her and Torvald's outing to Italy herself—however the obligation she owes soon turns into a wellspring of fear, fear, and disgrace. The excite of getting cash is in this manner appeared to have a drawback. Ibsen uses the bank as a representation of the money-hungry characters that formulate the entire play around…show more content…
It perfectly clarifies how women were demeaned and were thought to be nothing but domestic decorations. Ibsen portrays that using a marriage and continues to unfold the idea of whether or not love exists in such hard environments regarding women. Using metaphors to describe the tension between the different aspects of the Victorian women’s life, he paves the way for the feminist movement. Even though he does not consider himself to be a feminist, Ibsen established to send a message to all his viewers without implying that

More about Critical Appreciation Of A Doll's House

Open Document