Reaction: The Singer Solution To World Poverty

I would take him in.’”. When I read this it took me a little while to truly understand how deep the situation was. Here was a woman facing a housing and economic crisis, just trying to survive and all she wanted to do in that moment was help this young boy in need of a better life. She wanted to help this young boy before helping herself, even though they were both in rough situations in life. This line really stuck with me and made the final point to me, it showed me that many people are extremely selfless in order to help others, even when they are dealing with bigger issues surrounding them, because it is a morally good thing to

The Singer Solution to world poverty, which was written by accomplished utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer, is a literary work that was written with the purpose of inspiring readers to forsake all excess in their lives and devote their nonessential income to charity. Mr. Singer is widely regarded for his cut and dry philosophy and his direct approach to literature which is clearly displayed in this work. In this work he deftly attacks the topic of world poverty and first world charity head on, similar to a no holds barred cage match. While the essay’s argument is logical to the point of simplicity and has powerful appeals to pathos, his aggressive tone and demand that the reader give up the entirety of their wealth diminishes his position

Peter Singer argues that prosperous people should donate their excess money to the overseas aid groups. When saying this, he believes Americans should stop spending their money on luxuries such as a TV, a computer, a car, and videogames. Instead of spending money on items such as that, he thought we should start sending money to those who are starving in other countries and need our help. There are pros and cons to Singer’s argument and both can be greatly supported.

Millions of people are hungry and thousands of individuals die of starvation each day. Meanwhile, the average American spends a portion of their income on luxuries, such as televisions to imported cars. In the article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer stresses that Americans should donate all of their income that is not needed for necessities to overseas charities and aid organizations in order to resolve world poverty. However, his straightforward proposition to end world poverty lays on a controversial topic that questions one’s morals and rights.

The Singer Solution to World Poverty” written by Peter Singer. In the essay that Peter Singer wrote has a main point which is to give solution to the world poverty and how to deal with with the situation to end it. The article narrates that the philosophy Peter Singer demonstrate about the world poverty.

Peter Singer the man who wrote the famous proposal "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" talks about donating money to charity rather than spending it on luxuries to save lives. Singer explains this by stating examples of people put in a situation to sacrifice a beloved item for a child 's life. The first example talks about Dora a retired schoolteacher writing letters for illiterate people. When suddenly she gets an opportunity to obtain 1,000 dollars and all she has to do is bring a kid to a house of foreigners who are willing to adopt him. Dora brings the child, gets paid and enjoys her TV until her neighbor informs her that the foreigners really were organ peddlers.

Ethics Paper Today there are multiple countries struggling with lack of food due to various reasons such as natural disasters, manmade disasters, government policies and individuals actions. In Peter Singer’s article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” we see him focusing on all these aspects and the negative impacts they portray on those in desperate need (Singer, 1972, 229). Singer does this with a utilitarian approach which means he looks at situations as either right or wrong solely on the outcome of choosing one thing over another(Schweickart, 2008, 473). This, therefore, takes into account the interests of others.

In Peter Singer’s article entitled ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, he discusses the topic of poverty in Bangladesh and goes on to talk about its causes and the ways in which it can be somewhat eliminated in Bangladesh. Singer puts forth a statement stating that if there is a way in which we can avoid a negative outcome in a situation, without sacrificing anything of similar moral value, then we are obligated to do just that. Another point he mentions is that people would feel less obligated to give money to a person in need if they were living in an area far away from that individual as opposed to being within the proximity of that person. In addition, Singer also believes that with the transportation methods at one’s disposal in this

Taylor, I liked how you incorporated the fact that most Americans are beyond lucky when it comes to the adequate supply of food we have and how others around the world are not as blessed. This showing that many Americans take for granted the resources that we have. By including this you explain that we are very lucky, and therefore it would be possible for us to help others in need. You stated, “It rarely comes into our minds about the possibility of spending our money to benefit others rather than to benefit ourselves,” which is something that is in fact very true about most people (Long 1). I also agree with your opinion that it America should work on helping people who face poverty in our country, before helping those in other countries.

In one circumstance, we may feel the need to give to those who are poor to keep them from getting in our personal space; and in other circumstances we feel that we give to others out of the kindness of our heart. I completely agree with Ascher and her views on compassion, because I have been in similar situation where I have questioned why people give money, and whether they give with a whole heart or out of necessity. Furthermore, this essay can teach us plenty of lessons that can be utilized throughout our lives so we can teach others and make them aware of the need to be more

Philip Manning 12504697 Q) Evaluate Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. There can be no doubt that Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ is unrealistic, unfair and not sustainable. Singer’s arguments are valid arguments but not sound. In order to get a clear and balanced view of my arguments which disprove the Singer article, it is first necessary to examine and lay out the main aspects of Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. My arguments against Singer’s claims shall then be detailed and examined in depth.

Singer is no stranger to writing moral arguments, having written many different books and articles in the past on a wide range of ethical debates. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” originally printed in the New York Times in the fall of 1999 just before Singer began to work at Princeton University, is intended for the common man, a middle-class citizen who makes average wages and reads popular newspapers. As Singer is a professor of ethics, the article is structured around the

Singer argues that most wealthy people have the solution to end poverty in their hands to end poverty, but most of them don’t do it. Peter’s solution works for people who have enough money to spend on luxuries, but it fails for people who live based on their weekly income. Therefore, Singer’s successful essay gives ideas on how to save money monthly to donate, but it fails when the author urges people where and how much to donate instead of giving them the freedom to choose. Peter present his first character from a Brazilian movie. Dora is a women who got $1000 dollars for convincing and taking a homeless boy to a place where the child will be adopted.

In this paper I will be arguing against Peter Singer’s views on poverty, which he expresses in his paper “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Singer argues that all people with wealth surplus to their essential needs are morally obligated to prevent the suffering of those in dire situations. I will argue that you can not hold people morally obligated to prevent the suffering of others, and that people can only be held morally obligated to prevent suffering that they themselves caused. To begin, we will look at Singers beliefs and arguments regarding poverty and the responsibility of people to help those in need. Singer’s first arguments revolves around a girl named Dora, who is a retired schoolteacher, who is barely making a living writing

“The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is too drastic to be implemented, economically speaking, however another solution to world poverty would prove to be more