The first thing that must be discussed in order to answer the question appropriately is: What is truth? This is a really difficult question to answer. There is a big difference between something that is believed to be true and something that is true, basically because if something is believed to be true is not completely certain or accurate, could be one way or another. On the other hand something that is true is certain and definitive and no questions are raised, but there are many types of truth as well. According to Daniel Patrick Moynihan “Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, but they're not entitled to their own facts” which means that everyone can believe in what they want, but their facts must be able to be seen and understood …show more content…
Reasoning could be the most important way of knowing that is used to decide whether something is true or not certain. Logic is used to determine when a knowledge is true or inaccurate. Usually, when an authority states that something is true, people believe it unless they have some kind of knowledge in that field. Reasoning is a very important feature that helps to reach to a conclusion based on prior …show more content…
Emotions can make everything look blurry and generate doubt when it comes to truth, it can alter the results and conclusions lightly or in large quantities. When it comes to emotions, people tend to believe in what they are more emotionally attached to, their emotions influence in what someone believes something is true or not; the stronger the feeling, then you are more attached to something. This way of knowing affects directly and neutralizes the previous one, reasoning. When using emotions, people are blind to the truth, because they don’t what to see the reality of what they are attached to.
In here comes the term, “Appeal to Authority”. When someone that has an authority over us tells us something, we usually believe it, because we trust in that person and we feel that their knowing are certain. For example, when we were kids, our parents told us that Santa Claus existed, we believed them basically because we were emotionally attached to them and because they had authority over us. Just as mentioned previously, the concept “Appeal to Authority” also comes in reason. We believe in an authority’s words unless we have some kind of knowing in that field and we can fight against their point.
In conclusion, the four ways of knowing can provide us, independently, evidence for us to get closer to the real truth. However, each of them has their own limitations. Something
For example, It is pretty obvious that in this world people don’t express their feelings as much. “Later, going to sleep, he would feel the fiery smile still gripped by his face muscles, in the dark. It never went away, that smile, it never ever went away, as long as he remembered.” (15). Emotions are a huge can of worms that forces everyone to think and go into areas in their mind that they would be uncomfortable trying to work through and solve.
We can find what it means to be hidden from the truth, the different forms of knowledge, and telling others about the truth. However, this is not just a topic that we think about on a day to day basis. This is a topic that we face in the long term: What is the real truth? What is the reality of our universe? Why can we think?
Long before philosopher, Edmund Gettier came along, knowledge was thought to be equal to justified true belief, which is to say that: “You know p iff, i) p is true, ii) you believe that p, iii) and you are justified in believing that p” (Gettier, 1963) However, Gettier argued that ‘p’ cannot simply be known because you are justified in believing that ‘p’. He proposed several counter-examples to the Justified True Belief theory (JTB theory) and they are known as Gettier cases. In this paper, I aim to explain how a Gettier-style case spells trouble for the view that knowledge is justified true belief.
These three beliefs are the most important and vital information in this
Emotions are what propel you forward to reach your goal, but what also stop you from breaking your limits. They are what weigh into our decisions and help lead us to the choices we forever live with. Not only can they determine what we do, but also when and how we do it. At times they are stronger than others, pulling us forward or throwing us back as if we have absolutely no control. Just like in Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, the entire lives of two teenagers led by the emotions that they couldn’t ignore.
I will be exploring how emotions can influence good reasoning through areas of knowledge such as ethics and history. For example, in ethics, we always struggle to make moral decisions and we try to achieve the best decision with a good reasoning. During the process of decision making through reasoning, emotions can be both beneficial and harmful. For instance, I used to be against the idea of abortion, because I felt that every human being has a right to live. My reasoning against abortion used to be that: Killing people is wrong.
In Al Gore’s “The Assault on Reason,” many topics are presented to get his argument across. Gore’s thesis is not fully revealed in the essay, but one can infer it is about the people needing to wake up and realize what is happening. He wants people to ask questions, get reasoning, be a fully informed citizen. For example, Gore states "More and more people are trying to figure out what has gone wrong with our democracy, and how we can fix it." (Gore 9)
Writing and reading are necessary periodically. Many people are illiterate, which it closes many doors for them. There are many types of writing, hence there are distinct ways of reading as well. The most proper way of writing and reading are academically. Academic reading and writing are frequent and necessary.
William K. Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief” is an essay about justification and how we are morally required to prove our beliefs. Clifford’s theory throughout the essay was “It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.” Clifford thinks that it is a moral obligation for you to confirm each of your beliefs with sufficient proof, no matter how questionable or insignificant the beliefs may be. I believe he thinks this because beliefs have serious effects and consequences on others.
Truth is often a term that is taken into consideration when one is verbally speaking, but most find it rather difficult to truly define truth. While every person can attempt to uniquely give their own interpretation to what the world regards as truth, the realm of philosophy presents several brilliants ideas about the concept. In general, the study of philosophy recognizes two truths: objective and subjective. Objective truth can be described as truth that has always existed whether one knows it or not, while subjective truth is dependent on the person’s ideas and feelings towards a reality. Influential and well-known philosophers such as Mortimer J. Adler and Plato have contributed thoughts that often present similar ideas about the definition
Humans are unlike any other creature on this planet, as we are able to think and reason. These two abilities have created the most powerful minds ever known such as, Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, and Plato. These abilities have also lead to some powerful arguments one of such being our beliefs. Some philosophers believe that all beliefs must be justified, while others believe that only some of our beliefs must be justified. W.K. Clifford argues that it is morally wrong to act or believe without sufficient evidence.
As human beings we learn that in this life, we have to start from somewhere. Our emotions helps us to work things up, just imagine being someone with no emotions whatsoever, how would that even feel? It would be pretty boring. We need to express ourselves, and to make our own opinion. Even if those opinions are wrong.
However, a fallacy occurs when emotions replace the logic and manipulate the argument producing an emotional response not related to facts or supported evidence (2nd definition). The viewer should remain logical and not allow emotional reactions to interfere. Not everything the viewer hears is not true or accurate. When there is an emotional emphasis, it can be a distorted view of the
My definition of knowledge is a true fact or justified belief that is acquired through a persons experience and education. To a great extent, faith does play a role in deciding if knowledge we acquire has purpose and meaning in our lives however, sometimes faith does not play a role. Personal lives refers to our day to day life and how knowledge provides us with meaning and purpose in it. Its how we take shared knowledge and apply it to our individual perceptions and perspectives of our lives. Knowledge provides with the understanding of the world and gives us meaning in life.
Truth. People use this word almost everyday. And the question “What is truth?” dates back before Galileo, Plato, and Aristotle. People have tried to unpack the meaning of this simple five letter word and yet it has grown and become more complex than ever. There are of course different opinion that people say are truths such as, “I like that color.”