In conclusion we should have better gun control. There are roughly 32,000 gun deaths per year in the United States. That’s a big number of deaths. There should be a law were every gun how has ever been checked out or bought to have a number and if stole they have to report about just in case someone is trying to use it for the something bad. For the better and the sake of our planet we should have better gun control considering it will save a lot of lives.
Strict gun controls won 't make a big positive change because criminals don 't follow the law so whether you ban guns or not they will have a way to get to one. Like I said earlier if criminals can get to guns easier than your average person it will increase gun related violence. Not making guns available to people will just leave them defenseless in a time of terror. Therefore banning guns won 't leave us with a positive change. You can 't ever really ban violence; if someone wants to do something you can
If you guessed the AR-15 You are wrong it is the kinder egg. Gun control is a highly debated topic because hunters and recreational shooters carry and use guns for a living while others carry guns for malicious intent and a mind to kill. People argue about gun control because a lot of people do not misuse the weapons but all it takes is one well-coordinated
The gun control laws are put in place for two reasons. One is to stop criminals from obtaining any firearms. The second is to keep high-risk guns off the market. (Zimring 440) This is very important when attempting to stop criminal from weapons. People do use guns for legitimate reasons such as protection of homes, hunting, and target shooting.
People tend to get tangled in opinions and quotes on rather semi-automatic weapons should be banned or not, such as if they are protected by the second amendment, halting lawmakers from banning them. However, let there be no mistake that these weapons are a life threat to civilians. The amount of semi-automatic guns in the U.S. puts a shockingly large price on the cost the government would pay to buy all the semi-automatic rifles back. A fairly large amount of guns exist in the United States and of that amount, about a third are assault weapons. “A November 2012 Congressional Research Service report found that, as of 2009, there were approximately 310 million firearms in the United States: ‘114 million handguns, 110 million rifles, and 86 million shotguns.’” (Peters).
A military grade firearm is the most common weapon used in mass shootings. Owners of military grade weapons don 't find this very dangerous because they think people who think they can control the weapon like that know how to use it properly and safely, But many people are proven wrong because of all of our recent terrorism and attacks on people with guns. But then again others can argue that because military grade weapons should only be used by our government. The military should be able to use them because they will use the weapons safely and correctly for all the right purposes. Others may say that people might want them only as a weapon because they want to keep their family safe or themselves safe rather than to hurt other people for no reason.
It’s a true fact that people kill people, not guns. However, people use guns to kill people. So then, it would be understandable to think that it is necessary to control who can get guns. But yet, a large number of guns are sold to people whose backgrounds aren’t checked. This means America isn’t completely controlling who all can get guns — nobody is.
“The Panthers became experts on firearm laws and openly carried guns, in a sharp departure from mainstream civil rights technique. After California Assemblyman Don Mulford introduced a bill making it illegal to carry guns openly--a measure aimed directly at the Panthers--armed black men” (Tappan). The people using this law as their defensen are getting away with murder and aggravated assault so easily, due to the loose language used in the law itself. Now, police officers accused of using excessive force are trying to claim the law's protection (Robles). In response to the idea that crime has decreased since stand your ground law was put in place, is true, but in Florida, which passed the first Stand Your Ground law, has seen a 30 percent increase in homicides since then (Contributor) .
Guns don 't kill people, people kill people. One of the biggest problems in the United States is that politicians blame guns for all the problems in the country so they want to ban them, but more gun laws and regulations will not help. Guns have existed since before the American Revolution they will not be going anywhere anytime soon. Though guns are used in many bad confrontations they are also used for good such a the military, hunting, the police force, and even in some countries guns are still used to execute the most dangerous people alive. Though many people would argue those points by saying the military shouldn 't use guns we should fight our wars with wars with words and more peaceful ways of handling other countries.
This is partially due to citizens being unaware of current statistics and conditions, as well as the fear of the government seizing guns acquired legally if certain bans are put into place. However, elections show that even among those against gun control, people do approve of some general regulations, like background checks and gun registration. Also, many approved of not allowing any past felons or anyone deemed mentally ill to own guns. No matter what the majority believes, however, the misuse of guns by unknowledgeable owners, not usually the guns themselves, endanger us. What many people do not understand is that gun control laws do not necessarily mean making guns illegal and banned from the possession of all citizens.
(procon.org) Stricter laws make it harder for people to protect their homes and families. Executive vice preisdent of the NRA, stated, “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a goof guy with a gun” (procon.org). There are many more reasons why there should be less gun control laws, these are only a few. Americans deserve their gun rights. A summary of reasons why gun control will not work are reason 1: “There are already 300 million privately-owned guns”.
The pro-gun control supporters believe that having stronger gun control laws, increased background checks, mental screening, etc.. will help prevent shootings, murders, and gun related accidents. Many pro- control supporters believe that the second amendment doesn’t mean exactly what it says, they believe that the Second Amendment was intended for militias; that gun violence would be reduced; that gun restrictions have always existed; and that a majority of Americans, including gun owners, support new gun restrictions. Fact: (ProCon.org) the U.S. has the highest rate of firearm deaths among twenty five other high income nations, also not having strict enough background checks makes it easy for convicted felons and other people that should be prohibited able to buy and sell guns to unlicensed dealers in undocumented transactions that can never be traced back to that person. Out of a national poll, 92% of respondents, including 91% of gun owners were in favor of mandatory background checks for anyone who purchases a firearm.
Many are against concealed carry because it would lead to an arms race. As said by Kelly Sampson, on behalf of the Brady Campaign, allowing concealed carry would force the criminals to get higher damage guns, which would lead to an unnecessary amount of guns. If criminals got higher grade weapons, it would mean more violent crimes and more deaths. Obama once said “There is a gun for roughly every man, woman, and child in America. So how can you, with a straight face, make the argument that more guns will make us safer?” and many people on the pro-gun control side stand by this.
Framework: If we are able to prove that UBC’s are not effective, and should not be used, then we win. Contention 1: Implementing background checks would take a lot of money and manpower to actually work and would cause more people to become victims of crimes. Subpoint A: By implementing background checks it would raise the price of most firearms by more than 150 dollars. This would stop people who need guns to protect their families in low income neighborhoods from obtaining them because of their high prices. Subpoint B: This would also cause more people in low income areas to be victimized by criminals and have no defense against it.
The NICS searches for any criminal records a person may have, history of mental illnesses, any type of drug abuse or violent behavior. Since this system has been in effect, more then 2.4 million potential buyers have been denied. That is a huge number that may have saved countless lives and is definitely the type of procedures we need in this country to help gun violence decrease. The problem that arises is that the country needs to stop dividing on the debate of banning weapons and start taking the right steps to make sure that guns don’t end up in the hands of the wrong people. Only around sixty percent of gun sales use background checks.