Everyone in this world has experienced some type of hatred towards something or someone. This would result in some form of revenge that would later inflict harm upon that person or thing, but the person who sought revenge against someone or something won’t come out unscathed. Taking revenge on someone or something would always result in some form of harm to either the person who is being sought after or to those around them. That’s where redemption comes into play. Redemption doesn’t give the user as much weighted responsibilities as there would when taking revenge upon someone and it would be most beneficial to the user without inflicting any harm to anyone. Redemption allows the user to be cured from their sins or evils that they’ve inflicted …show more content…
What I mean by this is that it’s better to take the redemption path than to seek revenge because although it is slow, it is much safer and easier to go through than to take the revenge path. For example, in the book “A Long Way Gone”, written by Ishmael Beah, Beah goes through rehabilitation for several months but successfully was able to relieve himself from his past life as a child soldier and was able to gain his humanity back. Even though Ishmael Beah had to spend several months in a rehabilitation center, he was able to return back to normal than to take revenge on the rebels who killed his friends and families. But on the other hand, people can manage to take the revenge path and end up in the finish line without failing. The chances of this happening are slim to none because if you rush life, you’d run into some devastating results that would leave the user to harming themselves. Therefore Seeking redemption is a safer and better road but a slower ride than seeking revenge which is a bumpier road but a faster ride with higher chances to come across failure than
It also means paying back and that the victim feels he is entitled to reprisal.
Justice or Revenge? ¨To carry a secret, is to play with fire. You hold on to it and eventually youĺl get burned.¨ Revenge is the action of inflicting someone because of hurt or harm. In ¨The Crucible¨ by Author Miller, Abigail Williams, Elizabeth Proctor, and Ann Putnam are characters who seek revenge.
Once again revenge leads to the downfall of that person who was seeking revenge. It brings the fact again that revenge is no the
What is redemption? Britannica states that it is “to make (something that is bad, unpleasant, etc.) better or more acceptable. ” How does that lead to good?
The superior choice out of redemption and revenge is redemption. Wanting redemption is so much more effectual than wanting revenge. Seeking redemption causes a person to want to overcome, whatever the person is going up against. Redemption causes people to feel stronger and work harder to what they
“There is no revenge so complete as forgiveness.” says war veteran John Billings. Revenge is the desire to repay an injury by inflicting harm and hatred is the deep, negative thought that may lead to it. Hurting or harming other humans in today’s society is not allowed. Revenge has the reputation of being barbaric, short-sighted and a pointless instinct. It is an aspect of our human makeup that we must resist.
After being wronged, it is human nature to want to get even. No matter how many times someone tells someone else to do unto others as you would have them do unto you, it never sticks. Human nature is, was, and always will be to make sure that whoever made the pain receives the same. This was shown in Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible.
Fault and redemption. What do these two words really do in our lives? Do they give us another chance or are they just concepts that we want to follow? In the world we live in, one fault can often make or break something in our lives, but when granted with redemption, we don’t always take it as seriously as needed and soon our fault becomes someone else’s pride. Sir Gawain’s faults can be a constant reminder of the mistakes we all make as humans along with the quote, “It is clear then that there can be no redemption without fault, just as one is unable to return from exile without first being sent into one.
“Retribution” or “Retributive justice” can be defined as “a theory of justice that considers punishment, if proportionate, to be the best response to crime.” (Wikipedia, 2016) Peter Koritansky, philosopher and author made a distinction between two views on retributive punishment in his work entitled “Two theories of retributive punishment: Immanuel Kant and Thomas Aquinas” in 2005 in which he believed that the Thomistic understanding of retribution is superior to that of Kant and this write-up is going to outline the reasons as to why he think this is the case. To illustrate this, it is vital therefore that we understand the Kantian retributivism and Aquinas’s understanding of punishment. Firstly the Kantian retributivism or the theory of retributive by Immanuel Kant suggests that punishment in the form of coercion of force is necessary to establish justice and to punish criminals, he emphasized that “Punishment by a court…can never be inflicted merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or for civil society, but that it must always be inflicted upon him for the fact that he has committed a crime”
The action of vengeance does not resolve the original issue and in fact, creates internal struggles, while forgiveness allows for a greater sense of happiness. Acting on vengeful feelings, although a seemingly useful answer, does not truly resolve any issues. This is expressed when Prospero asks, "But are they, Ariel, safe?"
What is redemption? Redemption is the act of being saved or freed from sin. This is an important part of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Scarlet Letter.” Redemption was what the characters in the book were seeking, and was the reason for many of their actions. Because of the time period and the fact the people were Puritans, sins were not tolerated nor common, so when they happened they were a huge deal.
Revenge can be a horrible emotion; it can sometimes lead people to do horrible things. By definition, Revenge means to get retribution for a wrongdoing done to you. In my opinion, revenge is mostly caused by fear and the overwhelming feeling of payback Throughout history, revenge, or vengeance, has been altered by several cultures and religions, and even the American culture. Though it often leads one to perform criminal acts, Howard argues that it is a necessary component in the functioning of society. He points out that revenge is a threat that acts as a disincentive to undeserved violence.
Batley (2005) stated that restorative justice is about restoring, healing and re- integrating victims, offenders, as well as the society and also preventing further harm. In this assignment, I will be discussing approaches to restorative justice and illustrating their advantages and disadvantages to offending. I will also provide the applications of these five approaches of restorative justice which are retributive approach, utilitarian deterrence approach, rehabilitation approach, restitution approach and restorative approach in the given case study. I will then explain my preferred approach to justice through identifying a personal belief or value that underpins my choice.
Prison is a very harsh and bad place that no one should want to be in. Little freedom can make a person really aggravated. Nobody wants to be away from their family with little contact allowed. Little space and little privacy can only go for so long. Personally I think prison doesn't reform people because there are many repeat offenders, some people act worse when they get there, and also some people just don't like help and never want to change.
There is a worldwide trend in the use of penal imprisonment for serious offenses as capital punishment has been renounced by an increasing number of countries. Harsh punishments include capital punishment, life imprisonment and long-term incarceration. These forms of punishments are usually used against serious crimes that are seen as unethical, such as murder, assault and robbery. Many people believe that harsher punishments are more effective as they deter would-be criminals and ensure justice is served. Opposition towards harsh punishments have argued that harsher punishments does not necessarily increase effectiveness because they do not have a deterrent effect, do not decrease recidivism rates and do not provide rehabilitation.