The world renown classic novel, Les Miserables, written by Victor Hugo was adapted into a brilliant and masterful film through Columbia Pictures. The film was directed by Billie August, and sincerely brought to life through the actors, Liam Neeson who plays Jean Valjean and Geoffrey Rush who plays Javert. This film challenges you to look deeper than the surface, to see how things differentiate from the beginning of the movie towards the end. The characters change due to instances that have strongly affected their outlook on life. Jean Valjean was not the same man he was in prison shortly after he was released. We see a major conflict between Valjean and Javert, my opinion is because Javert still views him as a criminal instead of a changed man. This movie projects, how important Javert’s job is to him, he commits his whole life to the law and honesty; he never veers of the path of truth which will cause problems between the two characters.
Jean Valjean had spent 19 years in prison for stealing a loaf of bread and became a convict. He did not seem to value or appreciate life and the grace he was given when released from prison. Having nowhere to go after being released and on parole, he ended up staying with a bishop named Myriel. He chose to do what got him in prison, and steal the bishop’s most valuable silver. The police shortly caught up to him and were ready to return him to prison, but Myriel had said he gave it to him. When the bishop, Myriel, gave him mercy after
Les 400 Coups by François Truffaut displays personal cinema by sharing his own thoughts through the eyes of Antoine. As stated in the lecture video, cinema was a way for Truffaut to escape from his unhappy home life. His unfortunate home life is shown through the perspective of Antoine to display how Truffaut may have felt when he was a child. François Truffaut makes the audience feel sympathy and a sense of understanding for Antoine's predicament through the use of realistic and noteworthy sets.
So he has met other prisoners and they would make a plan to escape and what they did is when they went to bed they would sneak out of the barrack and then try to sneak through the gateway and the only one who made it out was Yanek. After two years of suffering he had
He soon flees Chicago, moving from place to place. He then gets caught and arrested in Philadelphia for insurance fraud, from burning down his hotel in Chicago for insurance claims. He also gets convicted for the killing of Benjamin Pitezal, after a investigator from a far city follows his paths uncovering all of his
When he tried to sneak back to where he was supposed to be, it was too late. The Council questioned, lashed, and beat him trying to find out where he had been. Nevertheless, he never told. Through the lashing and beating Equality 7-2521 withstood the physical torture to protect his discovery. After being there for so long, he knew that he had to escape.
In this final action, he attempts to redeem himself by gifting what remains of his estate to Pearl. Whether this is genuine or not is completely up to the reader. However, he did do something much unlike what was expected of him. He gave what he had left to the product of sin he had been trying to correct for years. This action allows readers to see him less cut and dried; he is left up to the reader’s
A Raisin in the Sun PBA Unit 2 Cinematography and filmmaking are art forms completely open to interpretation in many ways such lighting, the camera as angles, tone, expressions, etc. By using cinematic techniques a filmmaker can make a film communicate to the viewer on different levels including emotional and social. Play writes include some stage direction and instruction regarding the visual aspect of the story. In this sense, the filmmaker has the strong basis for adapting a play to the big screen. “A Raisin in the Sun” is a play by Lorraine Hansberry that debuted on Broadway in 1959.
His perverse needs far outweighed his desire to fit in as a respectable member of the community. His actions led him to be sentenced to ten years in jail, though he was able to get out early on account of his good behavior. His wife divorced him due to her embarrassment and her father's disapproval of him. He ended
There was no going back as his fate had already been put into stone as the murder was committed. When the criminals are caught they express that if they had done this again they would not have changed it, since the end result would have been the same (Chapter 8 page 220). They were both tethered to their malicious crime lives which they could not
The audience already knows that Blanche is mentally unstable, however in this scene Tennessee Williams uses different techniques to demonstrate how the tension aggravates her case. The scene starts with Blanche dressed in a “somewhat soiled and crumpled white satin evening gown (...) placing the rhinestone tiara on her head”. Blanche is drunk and is trying to persuade herself that she is still young and beautiful by wearing a beautiful gown, however even dressed up she cannot hide her true self; the dress in itself is crumpled and soiled, exactly the way Blanche feels about herself and the reason why she tries to purify herself all the time. The audience perceives Blanche’s mental instability when she sees herself in the mirror. “She catches her breath and slams the mirror”, the mirror represents the reality, it contrasts with Blanche’s mind, in which she lives in a fantasy world where she is still young and unsoiled, the fact that she slams down the mirror shows that Blanche is surprised and repelled by her image and therefore has a mental issue with accepting reality and who she has become.
He committed a relatively minor infringement of the law in trying to help his starving family, and paid the same price as one accused of a major crime. (B) This situation makes one question the fairness of the law as well as the very structure of society at the time. His life later unexpectedly ties in with the character Fantine. She is easily one of the most tragic figures of the film and a victim of circumstance. “I dreamed a dream in time gone by... when hope was high, and life worth living...”
This analyse will be about Under the Skin and this will be analysed with Lacan’s Mirror Stage. Before I start the analyse of Under the Skin, I will explain what “Mirror Stage” means. Mirror Stage is a "psychoanalysis" theory first introduced by the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan at the 14th International Congress of Psychoanalysis in 1936. The theory says the psychological development processes during the first 6-18 months of life. The child, prior to this period, is the total of needs and requests that who is not yet able to reach the level of perception that himself or herself is a separate being from the surrounding objects and individuals.
He acts as a guardian angel to many people, though because of his history occasionally has an urge to do wrong as he struggles between good and evil thoughts. Javert, on the other hand, condemns countless people, doing so in cold blood. He does not realize that his actions are wrong, but rather believes he is doing the country/town a service by condemning “criminals” and sending them to prison. While Javert’s position and beliefs are understandable, 5 years for a loaf is a little over the top. Another thing Javert and Valjean have in common is their conflicts in life.
This crime seems to be very forgivable. Thus, we can categorize it as a justifiable act of theft since it is done as a last recourse. Stealing a loaf of bread to feed a sister and her starving children is not bad at all, considering that life is the highest value that should be given stress. But Jean Valjean accepted his fate and has proved to himself that he has triumphed over his fear and had done justice. At least he had lived his life with love and he had been loved by Cosette, his so-called
Justin Barragan Prof. Madjaroff Aging 100 19 March 2018 Reflection Paper #2 In the film, The Intern, by Nancy Meyers, an older gentleman named Ben, played by Robert De Niro, decides he is bored with retirement. Although Ben has worked his entire career at a phone book company, he feels that he has more to offer in terms of work. He gets a flyer which encourages applying to be an intern via a video message for a senior intern program at an online fashion company. Shockingly he earns an interview and gets the internship.
Monuments Men is a fairly recent film with the premise of a group of soldiers during World War II tasked with protecting the artwork within the continental Europe from those who want to take it. It primarily centers on the story of Frank Stokes, played by George Clooney, and how he is able to assemble a ragtag group of “soldiers” and actually enter the frontlines. Over the course of the story, the group loses a few members, but do manage to discover the stashes of art hidden by Hitler and save it from destruction, including the Ghent Altarpiece and the Lady Madonna. Despite having already watched this movie, is still struck me how much the movie’s message still resonated with me. The movie makes a clear case for the value of art, and I feel