Many people were waiting outside the Court House that cold Tuesday morning. It must have been few minutes before nine o’clock in the morning, few seats were filled, and the rest were standing up outside the glass door waiting for the doors to open. You could tell from the tension that many had serious business to attend too. It is impressive how easy you could distinguish between the lawyers and the public. I found an empty spot to stand on and luckily it was next to two lawyers that seem to have something to conversate about. I reach my spot and hoping I would find something in their conversation that would educate me on what to expect inside the courtroom, but unfortunately, the topic of their conversation was sports which many men seem to find interesting even in a Court House. Thankfully their conversation was interrupted by the Sheriff that opened the door and invited everyone in. …show more content…
You could see the odd one alone trying to make eye contact, the young people accompanied by an adult and those in coveralls heading back to work after their court session. Two Sheriffs were walking around on a mission, I wasn’t sure if it’s a routine or there was a high-profile case that they were maybe focused on. One of the guys in coveralls was stopped and asked to show what was in his pocket by the Sheriff, at first I thought, why him, could it be because he was speaking in a foreign language with another young man or because he looked like a labourer in his dirty coveralls or maybe because he was acting sketchy and not sitting still. When the item in his pocket turned out to be a hunting knife I was glad she did ask and confiscate the knife. After all, according to the Justice Institute of British Columbia’s website, “Deputy Sheriffs are provincial peace officers who work closely with different partners in the Justice System to ensure all levels of courts in the province are operating smoothly and safely” (par.
Upon entering the chamber he realizes the defendants have been drinking coffee with the judge. Jerry, begins to explain to Jan that if the city well water was contaminated then he doesn’t have a solid case. Therefore the case should not continue. The judge agrees with Jerry, at this point Jan disagree and try’s to negotiate with the judge that case should continue, because the families want to testify. The judge then suggest that he will present the jury papers with simple questions to determine if the case continues.
Observe a Jury or Court Trial Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Author’s Note Observe a Jury or Court Trial This court case involves a serial killer, Jeffrey Dahmer, convicted of killing about 17 men between 1978 and 1991 (Jeffrey Dahmer - Full Trial - Serial Killer, 2012). The jury is composed of seven men and seven women who were to determine if Jeffrey Dahmer was guilty of the multiple murders. The jury begins by ordering for a three week sanity test to determine if Jeffrey Dahmer was sane when he committed the acts.
My initial impressions of the parties involved were that they were both very formally prepared for the trial. Mr. Hansen and Connor were the first to arrive to the court room and be seated at their counter. Both were dressed in formal attire, with several documents in their possession. Shortly after, Ms. Brough and Ruesch arrived, also dressed in formal attire. They also possessed
David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.
Judge Stevens’s courtroom displayed such interactions. In the case of The State of Texas v. Manuel Gonzalez Barajas. No. 334409, the attorney for Mr. Barajas, Dustin Galmor, failed to promptly inform his client of his trial date. The defense attorney spoke
If she were to lose the case she would be looked upon as a incapable lawyer, yet if she won she would be accused of lying and letting a guilt person free, to commit other crimes. The days leading up to the day of the trial were brutal. Many sleepless nights spent doing research and preparing questions for the district
The story “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell is a devastating story that brought two women together to help find the true motive behind Minnie Foster’s decision to murder her husband. The main theme throughout this short story is the theme of connections; Glaspell uses symbolism, and diction to demonstrate this theme. Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale work together to connect several different pieces of evidence in order to find the truth behind Mr. Wright’s killing. Not only are Mrs. Peter’s and Mrs. Hale using the connecting theme to solve the murder of Mr. Wright, but they also use it through both of their individual connections to Minnie Foster. They connect to her through sympathy as they discover reasons that may have encouraged her want
A dead bird, a dead man, a jailed wife, and five people to investigate such things. In “A Jury of Her Peers” in order to find the guilty culprit, there was a need to find a motive. The men would spend all day searching for the reason someone would murder the Mr. Wright, and so would the women. When the women finally did find a motive, they would hide it from the men. They had the right to do so because they themselves had felt the same way Mrs. Wright did, the men were being disrespectful, and the women were dismissed from the men’s sides to look upon things with no significance.
It was as much his duty as wearing the uniform and carrying the cell keys. But you could see in his eyes that he was wondering why. Even when he was searching me and not looking in my face, I could tell by the light touches on my pockets that he didn’t want to do it. And with the food it was the same. The chief deputy sat behind the desk, watching everything.
3), approaching the court room Gault had several mixed emotions not knowing what to expect. The judge told Mr. Gault
“The boy is five feet eight inches tall. His father was six feet two inches tall. That’s a difference of six inches. It’s a very awkward thing to stab down into the chest of someone who’s half a foot taller than you are. ”-(Juror two, 54)
A jury trial is a privilege that we all have so that we are administered a fair and impartial trial; thus, it must be taken seriously. Depending on each state, when summoned for the jury selection process, and chosen to serve as members of the jury, we are required to take an oath or an affirmation. Additionally, the consideration of the circumstances that lead us to be a witness, should be prevalent in our minds. It is important that we listen to the entire case and determine if the offender, based on the facts given during the trial and not on personal biases, should be convicted. I think this is important because the future of one person is determined based on the testimony of the witnesses whom have sworn truthfulness.
The defense attorney. As Jack’s defense attorney, I would first argue that the police did not find any evidence that Jack stole anything. The only physical evidence was found on Diane. Also, Jack did not admit to any wrong doing.
Thank you very much for taking your time off to have this interview. No. 8: No worries… It really has been one of my goals to spend the time to clearly explain to the public what happened in that jury room. [smiles mildly] Interviewer:
There are three components that make up the criminal justice system – the police, courts, and correctional facilities – they all work together in order to protect individuals and their rights as a citizen of society to live without the fear of becoming the victim of a crime. Crime, simply put is when a person violates criminal law; the criminal justice system is society’s way of implementing social control. When all three components of the criminal justice work together, it functions almost perfectly. For a person to enter the criminal justice system, the process must begin with the law enforcement.