Memorandum To: Mr. Dalek From: Sarah Jane Smith Date: 23 September 2014 Subject: Decision-making Reflections Dear Mr. Dalek, Please find the reflection you’ve requested below. As I sat down to my desk on a typical workday morning, an email flashed across my screen. It read six words, “Please come to the conference room.” My mind went into overdrive as I hurried down the stairs. It was only the beginning of the workday. All prior issues were resolved last night. What could this be about? Walking through the glass doors, I spotted the Vice President (VP) of my team pacing back and forth. Several members of my team were already seated, whispering with bewildered expressions. As I took my seat, the VP of my team revealed that a new study found that our client’s products contained arsenic. After an early morning phone call with our client, it had been agreed that all phone calls, including the consumer calls, would be forwarded for our team to handle. The VP looked at all of us and said, “What do we tell the public?” …show more content…
The Dartmouth study found that organic brown rice syrup contained “significant concentrations of arsenic” and we could not deny that our client’s product contained this ingredient. Discussion then centered on how could we reframe the study’s findings. The point of ambiguity we could capitalize on was, “There are currently no US regulations applicable to As [arsenic] in food…” A colleague asked, “Why does our client use organic brown rice syrup?” Our VP piped up, “Because it is “natural and less processed than other sweeteners.” After an hour of brainstorming, we finally decided on our message for the public. This message achieved our goal to preserve our client’s reputation in four ways: 1) Aligning with the “natural” connotation of the brand, as the product contains brown rice syrup because it’s an all-natural
In Pearson v. Shalala, when appellant tried to validate the health claims as per the procedure for evaluating the validity of health claims for the dietary supplements (21 CFR section 101.7), the FDA denied to include the four health claims on the labels for the dietary supplements marketed by Mr. Pearson and Mr. Shaw11. The FDA deemed that the claims lack the significant scientific agreement standard because the evidence provided for approval includes the research that examines the relationship between consumption of foods containing the components of dietary supplements and the risk of the diseases. On that basis, the FDA determined that the specific effect of the dietary supplement components could not be determined with certainty11. Along with that, the government disputed that the appellants proposed health claims could create confusion among the consumers11. In response to this, the appellant argued that their First Amendment rights have been impaired as under Administrative Procedure Act because the FDA was required to provide
On December 5, 2012, Daisy Luther, a journalist from Northern California wrote a blog entry on the conspiracy surrounding “certified organic” labels that is claimed by some companies and retailers. She brings up the question of whether these labels being stamped on food can really be verified or are they just a way to empty out the wallets of consumers. In the website The Organic Pepper, the blogger generally gives advice for different problems people encounter on a daily basis. Through her blog entries varying from ways to stay healthy to frugal living, Luther states her opinion of governmental interference on our food supply by citing sources from articles from Natural News and Time Magazine. She first starts out by arguing about how the
Based on the data gathered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the average American consumes more than 150 pounds of sugar and sweeteners each year. When broken down, that’s 22 teaspoons of sugar consumed per day. Americans don’t even realize they’re eating this tremendous amount of sugar. In the documentary Hungry for Change, director Laurentine Ten Bosch uses rhetorical appeals to advise that the listeners consider what they are consuming and point out the dangers of sugar and processed foods in everyday diets. While the statistics provided throughout the documentary contributed to the overall effectiveness, the use of emotional appeal was excessive and over-dramatized.
In the prologue of his book Salt, Sugar, and Fat, Moss recounts a time when CEOs of processed food giants, including General Mills, Pillsbury, and others, gathered to address the issue that many medical experts were slamming processed food as very unhealthy. Moss uses his word choice to paint former General Mills CEO Stephen Sanger in a very bad light when he writes, “But most often, he said, people bought what they liked, and they liked what tasted good. ‘Don’t talk to me about nutrition,’ [Sanger] reportedly said, taking on the voice of the typical consumer. ‘Talk to me about taste, and if this stuff tastes better, don’t run around trying to sell stuff that doesn’t taste good.’ To react to the critics, Sanger said, would jeopardize the sanctity of the recipes that had made his products so successful.
How a food safety myth became a legend (2016) concluded this because of the information that was needed to pass the USDA
The three essays assigned this week had several common threads running through them. The strongest core theme is the rapid change in the food cycle in America and the vast changes that have taken place in the way by which we grow, produce, and process the food that average Americans eat. The food we eat now is drastically different from what our grandparents grew up eating and the three essays each examine that in a different way. Another theme is the loss of knowledge by the average consumer about where their food comes from, what it is composed of, and what, if any, danger it might pose to them. “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele is a harsh look at the realities of food production in a country where large corporations, like Monsanto, have been allowed to exploit laws and loopholes to bend farmers and consumers to their
In recent decade, the United States has seen supermarkets continuously get filled with packages labeled with things like “Low sodium” or “No Trans Fats.” Companies stick these labels on their food to match the current fads of what is good for you and what is not. In his essay Unhappy Meals, Michael Pollan advocates a return to natural and basic foods, and deplores nutritionism. Pollan argues that nutritionism does not actually tell people what is healthy or not, and that the only way to be sure you are eating healthy is to eat natural, fresh food.
“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from
Montreaux Chocolates USA Case Key Questions Discuss the key challenges and marketing issues Andrea Torres must address at this time. Why do you feel these issues and challenges are key to the success of the new product line? The first and most important issue is the name for the new Chocolate. Apollo has a share of 15.4% in the US market in the field of the confectionery product, making it the second highest after the Fischer on the market in year 2011. Such a large share of the market will mean a strengthening of relations of the Apollo with its confectionery products.
Kalista Cook Miss Grimes College Composition II 9 February 2023 Persuasive Techniques Used by McKay Jenkins and Anna Lappe The topics of food sustainability and agricultural awareness are incredibly important. Authors McKay Jenkins and Anna Lappe bring awareness to these topics in their articles Can GMOs Be Sustainable and The Climate Crisis and the End of Our Fork. In these articles, the authors address the negative impacts of the food and agriculture industry. More specifically, they attempt to educate on the importance of creating environmentally conscious eating habits.
One of the most common action that businesses as well as individuals needs to face on a daily basis is a decision making process. Some of the choices can be difficult, other very simple , yet no matter on the situation these choices can have a large impact on our future life. As we are all aware, conflict can occur very fast and easily, so for the same reason it is important to learn how to effectively deal with these kind of problems. There are many different techniques which we can use while reducing the tension , yet the six step model process is known as the most effective.
“Are you really putting in what’s right for your body?” “Ingesting pesticides can inhibit brain development.” “Only organic foods can keep you safe.” Catch cries such as these seem to plague the media. However, consumers do not need to constantly worry about eating a strictly organic diet.
The professional values that I have chosen to reflect on is consent. Using Driscoll (2007) model of reflection which is components circle involves three events: what? So what? Now what? A reflection account will focus on my experience of working in the surgical ward.
Had he gone further into the report he would have found that organic fruits and vegetables are significantly closer in price to conventionally grown ones. We are all paying extra for the fallout from GMOs. This case indeed shows that food labeling issues are not only vital and extremely important today, but also that there is very hard to come to a solution. It would be very easy to label everything, require companies to let consumers know every single ingredient and in turn, hope to increase global health levels. However, it seems that opposing side has very strong arguments and companies are reluctant to sacrifice their profits in order to improve consumers health, which, very interestingly, is sometimes argued would not be achieved by doing so
1. Ms. Holmes should have assembled a team of experts who possessed great experience in relevant field and FDA regulatory requirements, this would have provided with greater resources and insight overview of how the industry work, which would have enabled her to manage regulatory requirements in a better way. 2. Ms. Holmes should have been more clear about the tasting data and should have made it public, so that it would have greater legitimacy. It would have been very helpful if there were detailed clinical studies with detailed analysis, so that there would have been legitimacy