After I had finished the reading of The Buffalo Creek Disaster, I was unable to calm my excitement down for a while. This is the kind of things that I probably will never encounter throughout my whole life, but I feel fortunate for having an opportunity to read the case. There are several impressions, reactions and comments that I have in terms of the buffalo creek disaster itself and the litigation process that is described throughout the book: 1. Taking about the initial reaction of Pittston after the disaster happened, they blamed for causing the dam breakdown in God’s action. Pittston did not even think about the impacted people and communities in the first place, instead, they were anxious to get rid of the potential liability, which was …show more content…
He dedicated a large amount of time and efforts to try his best to help those victims of the Buffalo Creek disaster even though there was a chance they would lose the case in the end. He understood it was the right and ethical thing to do. He knew how those victims suffered not only physically but also mentally, which could have profound negative impacts on their future lives. Also, I believed Judge Hall took those victims into consideration while judging this case. He stopped Pittston’s attempts to stall the case several times and desired to bring the justice to the victims. Maybe he was affected by the personal experiences of those plaintiffs and showed some favour to their side, but he was not off the line and still performed just like what a reasonable and professional judge would perform. However, in terms of the ethical conduct of Pittston, I would say I was so unhappy with their indifference and apathy. They did not think about how their actions would affect those already aggrieved individuals. Those victims already lost some important things in their lives, Pittston’s coldness and their focus on getting rid of the responsibility and avoiding payables could hurt those people even deeper. In addition, I was surprised by the attitude of those media press. They did not cover up for Pittston; instead, they truthfully reported what Pittston did and how their conducts influenced the people and communities, which put a lot pressures on Pittston and eventually made they respond to the case more
Although, he did fix his concentration on performing the perfect crime. Together, Leopold and Loeb murdered fourteen year old Bobby Frank. This goes down as one of the many of brutal murder scenes of the 1900s. If they wouldn’t have gotten the best lawyer in town, Clarence Darrow, it is more than likely that Leopold and his partner would have been hung instantly just as Dick and Perry were. Their attorney had such great points that were made, the judge only made them serve life in
Various reports suggest that he acted to persuade the men not to report what they knew to the criminal justice system but rather to have ‘empathy for Sandusky’ with no known mention of concern for the victims and their families (Alderfer, 2013). Their effectiveness in collectively denying allegations against Sandusky during this time lead the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Linda Kelly to comment retrospectively '' Those officials and administrators to whom it was reported did not report that incident to law enforcement or to any child protective agency. Their inaction, likely, allowed a child predator to continue to victimize children for many, many years” (Thamel, 2011).
The Great New Orleans Kidnaping Case Essay #2 The Reconstruction Era, in the history of the United States, has two meanings: the first covering the entire nation from 1865 to 1877 following the Civil War; and the second covering the transformation of Louisiana from 1862 to 1877. Reconstruction was a prolonged and difficult process that still impacts the state of Louisiana, as well as the United States today. In The Great New Orleans Kidnapping Case: Race, Law, and Justice in the Reconstruction Era, the author and historian, Michael Ross, argues that the public reaction to Mollie Digby’s kidnapping and the trial of her suspected kidnappers can help readers understand the history of “New Orleans and the Reconstruction era.” Several details must
Georgia, Furman and his attorneys helped the supreme court decision that overturned his death sentence. Furman killed someone while robbing someone’s home and was sentenced to death. He did not feel that that was right and him and his attorneys argued that the fourteenth amendment protected him from his punishment. There are not as many death penalties in today’s world in America because of this case. I would not have voted for Furman on this case though, I strongly agree with Georgia.
Governor Rick Snyder caused one of the biggest disasters in Michigan. The flint water crisis. Governor Snyder switched the Flint water system which was connected to the Detroit water system to the Flint River. And right away people started noticing severe changes to their water. This was caused from the water pipes corroding and lead leaking into the water.
As a head judge, Danforth should be able to see through the deceptions of criminals. Danforth’s lack of common sense is one of many examples that prove that he is the most responsible for the hysteria during the
The Buffalo Creek Disaster written by Gerald M. Stern helped me understand the different decisions a lawyer must go through to help their clients. The Buffalo Creek Disaster was a man-made disaster that occurred in February 1972. The Buffalo Creek Mining Company’s coal waste refuse pile collapsed, leaving over 125 people dead and 4,000 people mentally distraught. The Arnold & Porter law firm was reached out to by survivors for help and Gerald M. Stern was appointed as the lawyer for the case, who eventually won $13.5 million for the survivors.
As he works on a case he invests his time and effort into finding what a justifiable and truthful. But, with working in his field come risks especially when it meant defending someone who others think the death penalty is a justifiable way of
Its march 5th 1770live here at the Boston Customs House. There are rumors that a fight broke down between the colonist and a lone British sentry. We only have a few people throwing snowballs and heckling the sentry.it now seems that there are more people joining in on snowballs. I’ve also seen some rocks mixed into the snowballs. It looks like it’s getting out of hand.
In conclusion, Abigal Williams, Judge Danforth, and Reverand Hale are
This case shows how the government continued to disagree on how to handle scandals and let someone in power limit the investigations. The government probably didn’t want to have to investigate another scandal, as they were still
1045 Words The Mountain Meadows Massacre Way back in 1857 the murders of 120 men, women,and variety of all ages of kids, in Southern Utah called Mountain Meadows. It was one of the four largest mass killings in United States History. These Arkansans were going through Southern Utah heading towards California. The first attack in a siege of five days with the wagon travelers fighting back.
It confirms the already assumed. During the court trial, Dr. Jones was asked “From your conversations and examination of Perry Edward Smith, do you have an opinion as to whether he knew right from wrong at the time of the offense involved in this action?” (296). The doctor replies with a simple no. I strongly disagree what the doctor decides to reply. He claims he has no opinion because of Perry having no opinion.
During the trial, the doctor who analyzed Perry’s sanity, Dr. Jones, testified his opinion: “‘From your conversations and examination of Perry Edward Smith, do you have an opinion as to whether he knew right from wrong at the time of the offense involved in this action?’... Answer yes or no, do you have an opinion?’ ‘No’” (Capote 296). He then follows this up with a lengthy and detailed description of how the Doctor would have defended his response had he been allowed by the prosecution to elaborate.
From a well educated background, his qualifications verify his interpretation to Martin Guerre’s case. Not only was he present for the trial, he was one of the ten judges overseeing the case. He was also a skilled lawyer and professor at a university. He