Opening (Darya): When we think about fashion, the first thing that comes to mind is models, runways and clothes. But fashion is linked with many other aspects of our lives – one of them is politics. Throughout the years, fashion and politics had great influence on one another. We are going to discuss some of the connections fashion has with politics: first, we will talk about political symbols and how they became fashionable. Second, we will discuss about politicians who wear military uniforms: what does it mean? Why do they do it? Third, we will talk about the role of women in politics – how do they need to present themselves in order to be considered as serious as men? And in the end – a small surprise
Ronny: There are many examples of political
…show more content…
When it is connected to people in powerful positions it grabs a lot of attention. During different times in history, women had to think of their dressing code as a way to pass their political agenda. Different articles which discuss this subject where published and showed the growth popularity of it. The historian Robert Young claimed that most of them prefer to ignore it, and it actually considered taboo. Another basic assumption is that every political figure takes part in the "power dressing" which connects dressing code to a political agenda. The roots of this phenomena go back to 1945 BCE to the Egyptian queen Hatshepsut, who according to some scholars of antiquity believe that, unlike Cleopatra and other queens, she insisted on masculine look in order to prove that she is not different from the previous leaders. The reason for this behavior among women, can be explained by examining the psychological influence of society on us. The differences between perceptions of male and female are forced on us from a young age and influence our aspirations. The toys that are being given to children direct them unconsciously to the professions that society expects them to have: "feminine" dolls which represent professionals such as a nurse, a teacher and a librarian for girls, and an astronaut, a manger and a doctor for boys. Furthermore, it influences the way people think about their qualities.
In conclusion, Women in politics all around the world were influenced by "power dressing" including Margaret Thatcher, Angela Merkel, Condoleezza rice and Hillary Clinton. Nowadays women feel more comfortable with their powerful positions and try to combine their feminists views and political agenda with feminine and formal
Hatshepsut’s change in interpretation and image changed over the three stages of her life being as Queen Consort, Regent and as Pharaoh. These stages are shown through her change in titles and shifts in her physical depiction to the people of Egypt. As the wife of Thutmose II and Queen of Egypt, Hatshepsut was given the traditional titles of the most powerful women in Egypt consisting of ‘Kings Great Wife’ and ‘Gods Wife of Amun’. These titles allowed her to undergo the conventional expectations of being a Queen entailing bearing children and being a passive visible complement to the King.
Because of sexist opinions of the time, many people believed that a woman had no power to create change, especially in government since she could not vote. Women themselves believed this societal expectation, and although Grimke does not reject society’s idea of femininity and womanhood entirely, she specifically rejects their supposed political incompetence in a rebuttal. Using evidence from general and specific political movements in England, all of which were greatly aided by the support of women petitioning the government, Grimke assured her audience that “When the women of these States send up to Congress such a petition our legislators will arise, as did those of England, and say: ‘When all the maids and matrons of the land are knocking at our doors we must legislate.’” (Grimke, 192) This summary of her somewhat vague past points is similarly nonspecific; however, this is still effective since simply alluding to historical events rather than explaining them was sufficient for an audience that knew more about England and its history than contemporary Americans do today.
A study conducted by Dahlerup in 2006, shows that gender reforms have boosted women confidence and have had a positive effect on political participation (Dahlerup 2006). Since 1990 Nicaragua, Panamá, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, and Costa Rica have elected a woman as president. Since the 1990s many countries have established new gender expectations with a substantial increase in political participation by women (Inter-Parliamentary Union
“Fashion is part of the daily air and it changes all the time, with all the events. You can even see the approaching of a revolution in clothes. You can see and feel everything in clothes.” – Diana Vreeland (Quoted from -at: https://www.harpersbazaar.com/fashion/designers/a1576/50-famous-fashion-quotes) Throughout this essay I will be anaylsing the image above which captures a pivotal moment of women’s fashions.
Historically, women have been excluded from political institutions and they remain the group with the most marked inequality between demographic weight and representation on decision-making bodies. While it is correct to argue that women have been and continue to be excluded from political institutions, it is less valid to assume that they have refrained from political
An Image a Little Too Carefully Coordinated is a writing piece by Robin Givhan, a fashion editor that won the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism in 2006. She is considered to be a very blunt person that grew up in Detroit. Givhan has written about the clothes of presidential figures and been published as a prestigious writer. In this essay, Robin tries to convince her audience that the Roberts family, how they dress themselves, is distasteful and should be criticized by the public. Throughout, Givhan exemplifies the inappropriate attire displayed by our President's family and how they allow visitors to the White House to wear otherwise disingenuous attire.
The progression of the role of women in politics changed beyond recognition; however Markievicz refusal to take the seat in Parliament showed that some women still held the prewar traditional ideals. A third act of equal
The Women’s Suffrage opened the door for women in politics and in occupations. Before the Movement, women couldn’t vote or run for office, and women holding jobs such as doctors was frowned upon. If the Suffrage Movement hadn’t happened in 1848, the present would be very different and much more sexist:any single mothers would struggle even more to support their children; women would just be expected to remain in the “women’s sphere” (the house;) and women would not be able to vote. But because of the suffragettes taking this stand, women can run for office; hold occupations that they desire; and
Throughout the 20th century many avenues of society were forever changed thanks to advocacy groups. Inequalities have been corrected, policies and laws have been changed, and the sexism intertwined throughout culture, social structures and in everyday life is no longer seen as acceptable. Many groups especially women’s advocacy groups in Canada, have achieved this positive change. The “Quiet Revolution” was the advocacy for women’s rights which took place in Quebec from the mid 1950s to the late 1960s (Gosselin, 2006). Although they did not identify as feminists, women’s groups in Quebec demanded and advocated for equal rights and the inclusion of women in the political sphere giving women a voice within government “to oppose the sexism of
The topic of this model is to examine the rhetoric of female political candidates and how it affects their chances of being elected into political office. The area has received growing attention within the last forty years as more women began seeking representation in the American government (Dolan, 2014). Furthermore, there has been a considerable amount of attention since the 2008 Presidential Elections. A sizeable amount of research shows women facing negative stereotypes in the news media.
(Moss). Women taking on roles within the government are not seen as strong as a man. Sexism was alive in our most recent election, the election of 2016. Terri Vescio, a psychology professor at Penn State, said “The more female politicians are seen as striving for power, the less they’re trusted and the more moral outrage gets directed at them.” (Hidden
After World War I, women’s fashion took a turn and prospered into an exciting and new vibrant style. Society previously held tight boundaries on how women should dress. There was no law to the way they could dress, but simply that their morals were tighter and they had an unspoken, common knowledge before the 1920s of how women should dress appropriately.
The “Misogyny” speech by Julia Gillard, the prime minister during the time, was performed in the house of representatives on 9th of October 2012. Clear usage of her role as prime minister, her gender and word choice are shown as effective shaming of the leader of the opposition, Tony Abbot. The speech was given because of Abbots sexist and Misogynistic statements. Because of Abbots position in parliament as opposition leader, he should be targeted to maintain power in the government and giving the elected labor party a good public image in the regards to sexism and Misogyny. In doing so she was able to defend her standpoint as a female minister of Parliament.
UXT Task 2 Austin Olooaringo (ID# 000556089) Western Governors University Work: Alexandros of Antioch, Venus de Milo, c. 130−100 BC Period: classical Period A1. Initial Thoughts My initial thought was the display of feminine beauty and grace as seen from an artist perspective dating back in time. The goddess Aphrodite is a sculptural elegance that has continued to fascinate the art world and remains relevant from the time of its discovery on the island of Melos around 1820. Her posture and demeanor reflect confidence of her personality and womanhood.
Fashion never remains the same and with the advancements in technology fashion has become even more wavering. Fashion is highly influenced from the social, technological and economical changes. A series of events that replace current societal patterns with the