History is not static. It ebbs and flows like Earth’s great lakes, rivers, and oceans. Rather than being directly changed by the sun and the moon like the tide, history is influenced by new found evidence, reinterpretations of past events, and many other factors both seen and unseen. These “ebbs and flows” in historically understanding of the Alamo have and continue to shape culture within Texas, the United States, and Mexico due to the countless narratives, myths, and legends birthed from the Alamo battle in 1836. For some, the history of the Alamo has inspired patriotism, courage, and nationalism. For others, the Alamo’s history serves as a weapon that perpetuates injustice and racism in their everyday lives. Initially, I was interested in studying the specific events of the Alamo and their influence on culture, popular memory, patriotism, and courage; however, my interest swayed to look specifically at the aforementioned racism that resulted from the many themes commonly associated …show more content…
This documentary covered the entire spectrum of the ways in which historians understand the Alamo using a variety of different lenses. Over the course of the two-hour film, many of the historians who wrote the sources further discussed in this essay also contributed to the documentary. In Remember the Alamo, viewers witness the Alamos transformation from old church mission, to hallowed battleground, and into how the Alamo’s many histories influence society today. This documentary did not only illuminate the different historical approaches, it also bridged the approaches – showing the relationships between symbolic, cultural, military, political, social, and racial histories. In the creation of this documentary, the History Channel created a meaningful piece of history that enlightens it viewers and analyses how historians come to explain the
The Alamo I. One would not believe that you could lose a battle, but win a war. Although, one group of people did just that. The Texans all died at the battle of the Alamo against the Mexicans. The Alamo was originally a church that was named after nearby Alamo trees. It was home to the battle of the Alamo that was a momentum shift for the battle of Texas Independence.
Chinque Thompson Professor Rai WRT 102.75 14 April 2016 The Past’s effect on the Present Lone Star directed by John Sayles is a film which follows a man’s journey trying to search for the truth in his mysterious town. Through the movie, Sayles intertwines many different backstories of various character’s lives, each of whom are dealing with their own issues of history.
In the book written by James W. Loewen, Loewen studies the biases of an ordinary history class, beginning each chapter with quotes from various historical figures. Loewen indicates that the root of the problems Loewen discusses comes from the history textbook itself. This being said the textbook gives a dull, culturally biased description of the past, often alienating readers such as Latinos, Native Americans, and African Americans. Throughout Loewen’s chapter four, there are many ways in which Loewen discusses the Native Americans to be talked about more highly than the Natives should be. The Native Americans were talked about in many negative ways, and the Natives are said to have been “lied about” more often than any other portion of the
On the 25th of June 1876 on the ‘greasy’ grass of Dakota the Battle of the Little Big Horn occurred. Sioux and Cheyenne Indians defiantly left their reservations, outraged over the continued intrusions of whites into their sacred lands in the Black Hills. They gathered in Montana with the great warrior Sitting Bull to fight for their lands. Determined to resist the efforts of the U.S Army to force them onto reservations, Indians under the leadership of Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse wipe out Lieutenant Colonel George Custer and much of his 7th Cavalry at the Battle of the Little Big Horn. This essay with try to determine why the U.S. Army lost this, every so important battle against the Sioux.
In this essay, I will argue how the Chicanos in the U.S. have responded to the lack of inclusion in history, opportunities, to racism and violence because through time we have seen how the Chicanos have been part of the country history and what it came to be, but we have been left out of history. The Chicano helped build what the united states came to be, we are part of its culture since the treaty of Guadalupe was signed, but our path has not been easy, many have been victims of oppression, poor working conditions, lack of civil rights and segregation. I’ll argue not that the Chicano has been a victim but what he or she have done to change the way things were for our ancestors in this obscure past of our history, how we have come together
Daniel Golaszewski November 11, 2015 Sleuthing the Alamo Davy Crockett's Last Stand and Other Mysteries of the Texas Revolution Sleuthing the Alamo by James E. Crisp is a great book that I personally recommend for anyone to read especially the history fanatics. Crisp takes the readers on a adventure to uncover the truth about racism, Sam Houston, David Crockett’s death and the Texas Revolution. James Crisp focus throughout the book is to uncover the truth about the Texas Revolution and how racism was a consequence because of it. He wants to remove the myths from Texas history. Crisp really gets the readers to step into his shoes by explaining the steps he takes to examine the documents.
As stated before, the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because of three reasons, Americans were killed, Texas was already annexed, and Manifest Destiny allows it. The United states had many superb reasons for going to war with Mexico. This essay is significant because it helps explain the United States’ choice to go to war with
Houston used the derogatory words such as “phlegm of the indolent Mexicans” to portray his opponent (38). This anti-Mexican phrase illustrated the hate of Sam Houston to all Mexican which Crips found it really strange after studying Houston’s history for so long. In his speech, Houston even accused that Tejanos had helped the enemy and brought threat to the Houston’s side (38). By reading his speech, one could easily imply that Houston was really a racist by creating a distinctive dichotomy between Anglo and Mexican. His speech also inferred that Texas revolution happened simply because the racial issues between two groups, which contradicted to Crisp’s knowledge.
From 1966 to 1981 San Antonio, Texas, was a segregated city ruled by Anglos and important business people. The people who lived in the west and south sides of this city fell under housing. Gangs were really popular and broke out frequently. Then farm workers broke out in the strike and marched through the city’s streets forming a movement to get rid of the Anglos who took advantage of them. David Montejano, in this book, uses sources that are not open to anyone unless asked for.
week’s lesson we read, “Unearthing the Hidden Histories of a Borderlands Rebellion”, an essay by Benjamin Johnson. This essay starts off by describing the Plan of San Diego revolt that started in the summer of 1915. The plan was modeled to create a “liberating army of all races”, to create an “army” of Mexicans, Blacks, and Indians to in order to kill all white males. The Plan of San Diego revolt also called for this army to coup the United States government in Texas, Colorado, New Mexico, and California. Johnson believes that the coming of the railroad in 1904 was the critical local event that started this plan.
He presents his opinions based on facts and reasoning, and enlightens his readers with many truths that had been buried and hidden behind false beliefs. While digging deeper into myths surrounding the Alamo, Crisp uncovers hidden truths involving other historian’s information about facts like Davy Crockett’s memorable death (p. 65), the misquoted Houston speech (p. 49), and the validity of the de le Peña
In the Chicano movement art was used through murals and poems to combat racism. The poem “I am Joaquin” was used to “exemplify the Chicano faith and strength of their community” (Quest for a Home Land). This was a tool to combat racism through the use of creative writing, thus showing the peaceful manner of the Chicano movement. The murals created by Chicano community exemplified their struggle in an Anglo American society and peaceful beauty of their culture that was once thought to be “savage and violent” (Mann, 15). In history our ancestor’s artistic expression was similar to the Chicano art to show our strength and pride of who we are, but early historians showed it as something “violent and uncultured” (Jackson, 10/20/15).
This lesson, in comparison to other lessons within the first half of the unit, requires the most direct teaching, which carries with it, its own unique twist of strengths and weaknesses. Teachers, when direct teaching is the main tactic used within a lesson become a curriculum and content gatekeeper. This means what the students will learn is almost completely determined by what the teacher decides to focus on. The standards call for the causes of the Spanish-American war to be understood by the students, and frequently what is tested is based on these factors and the outcome of the war, in terms of how it affected America. Rarely, unless within a specialized class is the war’s battles focus on within a high school setting.
Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America’s most valuable land, the war itself wasn’t legitimate because of the revolution in Texas, motivation for superiority, and the U.S. government’s actions. To begin, the Texans began an unreasonable war because they didn’t follow Mexico’s laws and conditions. When Mexico started selling cheap land, they set conditions for the people moving in. The people had to convert to Catholicism, learn Spanish, become a Mexican citizen, and have no slaves. Many Americans didn’t like being told what to do, and disobeyed the rules and laws.
“Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress”, chapter one of “A People’s History of the United States”, written by professor and historian Howard Zinn, concentrates on a different perspective of major events in American history. It begins with the native Bahamian tribe of Arawaks welcoming the Spanish to their shores with gifts and kindness, only then for the reader to be disturbed by a log from Columbus himself – “They willingly traded everything they owned… They would make fine servants… With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.” (Zinn pg.1) In the work, Zinn continues explaining the unnecessary evils Columbus and his men committed unto the unsuspecting natives.