In the United Kingdom for example, the traditional legitimacy is based on history of the royal family. Although the United Kingdom is a monarch, the powers of the monarchy are fairly limited. The House of Commons and the House of Lords make up the United Kingdoms government. The House of Commons is seen as far more legitimate to the people than the House of Lords, because the people elect its members (Troolin). In many parts of the world, legitimacy is greater when the citizens can elect and trust the workers and work their government plays throughout the world.
The internet, specifically social media, did not make this possible for Americans, it just made it easier for them. When talking about democracy in America, Alexander Tocqueville “ considered the dedication of the American people to public affairs to be at the heart of the healthy and lively American democracy, and added that participation in public affairs contributed significantly to an individual’s sense of existence and self-respect” (Papacharissi, 10). The same can not be said for nondemocratic countries with authoritarian regimes. I think a lot of Americans don’t realize how much more freedom we have when it comes to political speech when compared to rest of the world. Shirky, who has studied the subject, says it make sense that internet freedom is so important to Americans since it aligns with many of their core values.
Theoretical, this type of government allows the people to vote to elect rulers to govern on their behalf, this liberty brings happier and productive life. On the other hand, in the totalitarianism, the government ruled by a single person with complete power. In this form of government, the citizens’ will are not taking in the consideration. Even we could say that to totalitarianism is the regime where the public is committed to silence. Moreover, totalitarianism not only canceled the citizens’
Also, the decision based nature of democracy is dictated by a rule of the majority, however, in a democracy, the rule of the majority, does not mean that minority voices are ignored, so it is the work of democracy to scrutinize the power of the majority(Ibid). This is, therefore the premise of elections for representation (via a plurality in the existence of parties), public offices are earned through a competition – of ideals and values embedded within each political party. A modern democratic outlook is built on the principles of representation, equality and freedom. On the other end of the regime spectrum is
Ancient democracy was based on the direct participation of the masses in public affairs. In contrast, modern democracy is representative in character and it demands the active participation of the people in the government. Thus, in a democratic state, the acts of the government are in accordance with the will of the people, since they have the right to elect and remove their leaders and the right to determine the main lines of policy of
In a republic, the constitution protects only certain rights, which cannot be taken away from the government even if the majority of civilians have elected these rights. In a democracy, it is different where the majority of civilians is not restrained to rights and can impose their own rights on the minorities present within a society. However, along with having different limitations on governments by the law, the two political movements do have similar principles on the ideas of rights, where through the use of a representational system, they both allow citizens to vote to elect politicians to represent their interests as well as to form a government to represent these so called civilian rights. Therefore, there are some overlaps is between the way the two governments are ruled, however at the end of the day the clear difference is that no matter what the outcome civilian rights, it all depends on the way the elected bodies choose to distribute these rights over
This form of government calls for separation of power amongst the government. It divides its powers amongst the arms of the government which are judiciary, executive and legislature. Apart from preventing abuse of power, it also promotes cooperation and unity amongst the government bodies. When a state uses democracy as its political system, it tends to have certain levels of calmness.
For a successful democracy, the existence of a free judiciary is a must. Without it, the system may be equivalent to dictatorship. Parliament and the state legislature made the constitution and the judiciary is given the responsibility to correct their errors, if at times the other two cross the limits of their powers as defined in the constitution. Thus, these three limbs of democracy must be separated as much as possible and balanced against each other. As majority of legislatures and executives are of the same party in power, they may act in such a manner in which an individual or a group of people might not get benefitted from the policies made for them.
For example, voting in elections is good to know the democratic system of government is protected and give people to have a voice in government. Additionally, voting is important implementation to choose our presidents and how the leaders will run the country. We cannot imagine country without leader, otherwise chaos would spread and country can be fall down. It is responsibility of citizen choosing the leader to lead them to have developed country in future. Citizen should vote not only for himself but also for the society.
While democracy is noted as one of the most efficient government systems ever, it is, however, not without any downsides. Let us take a look at its advantages and disadvantages. List of Advantages of Democracy 1. It protects the interest of citizens. As previously stated, the citizens in a democratic country are given the right to vote on political, social and economical issues, particularly the representatives they want