The Cruelty Of Animal Testing
In recent years, it is reported that more than 100 million animals die from various of animal testing each year (2004), and about 70% of the animals used are mice and rats. Viewing these shocking data, I believe that many can see the cruelty of animal testing. Accurately speaking, the phrase “animal testing” is any scientific experiment or test for some research purposes in which an animal is forced to undergo something that will cause them pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm (2017). Such animal testing dates to the mid-19th century when the experimental medical science appeared. Nowadays, with the rapidly development and in-depth study of the medical science and pathology, it shows that there are more and more needs to carry out animal …show more content…
That is a strong evidence proving that the animal testing is to some extend unscientific. On the one hand, the plain fact is that we cannot make sure that any products that do no harm to the experimental animals are safe for human as well. After all, animals are not completely same with us in physiology. A case in point is the polio vaccine, which is delayed several years just because monkeys are infected with polio through the nasal cavity while humans are infected orally. The difference in stress levels will significantly affect the treatment of poliomyelitis vaccines (2015). When the animals are isolated, the pressure on the animals will cause doubt about the accuracy of the outcome of the drug. During the whole process, not only did it cost quite a lot funds, but also it caused meaningless sacrifice of monkeys as the success rate is really small. On the other hand, in most cases, the animal testing is to study diseases that do not occur in animals in nature, such as some cancers humans suffer only and HIV. With the existence of the scientificity as stated above, it goes without saying that the animal testing may also cause erroneous and a danger to human …show more content…
Nevertheless, plenty of studies and statistics have proved that the inhumanity and other disadvantages of the living animal testing, together with the great efforts have been already done, we can see a bright future of a non-animal-testing world. This process may be long, but it is not only researchers’ but also everyone’s duty to eliminate living animal experimentation and make a more harmonious
Scientific Boundaries In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1132 Words | 5 PagesScientist have been overstepping boundaries in many parts of the scientific world, one of these being animal testing. Animal testing is when scientist test on animals and inject them or mutate their genes for a human gain, typically with no gain for the animal. The National Library of Medicine posted an article on the flaws and harms of animal experimentation, these flaws can be put in these, “...three major conditions undermine this confidence and explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, fails to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics.” The first condition being the influence of laboratory procedures and environments on experimental results. The conditions in these experiments show that, “animals in laboratories are involuntarily placed in artificial environments, usually in windowless rooms, for the duration of their lives.
Animal Testing Dbq
796 Words | 4 PagesEvery year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.
Persuasive Essay: The Role Of Animal Testing In The World
643 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.
Animal Testing Controversy
1632 Words | 7 PagesThere is much controversy with regards to animal testing for medical research and there has been throughout the centuries. We can trace the issue back all the way to the 4th century when we have the first record of animal experimentation, Aristotle dissecting animals for study. In the 1600s, scientists began using animals as a way to explore the human body which led to many advancements in the medical field. Such advancements include Emil von Bering finding a cure for diphtheria toxin for guinea pigs; further research allowed him to produce a diphtheria vaccine for humans (Bright).In spite of these many medical achievements brought on through the use of animal testing, there are still those that argue the practice is not justifiable and should
The Ethicality Of Animal Experimentation
1144 Words | 5 PagesMany see it as “ total elimination of animal testing will significantly set back the development of essential medical devices, medicines, and treatment” (Hajar 7). Animal testing is a necessary evil that has been extremely beneficial to humans and is crucial to the advancement of medicine in the
Inaccurate Animal Testing
400 Words | 2 PagesEvery day, thousands of animals are subjected to cruel, inhumane treatment. In the United States, there are many laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, but one of the most harmful ways of abusing animals is not only legal, but considered by many to be completely justified. The process described is that of animal experimentation, the act of performing experiments on an animal that can deliberately cause the animal suffering and even death. Animal testing should be abolished because it is unnecessary, inaccurate, and cruel to animals. Firstly, animal testing is an inaccurate and outdated means of gathering information.
The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesMillions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.
Animal Testing In Medical Research
1866 Words | 8 PagesAbstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.
Animal Testing Is Cruel And Inhumane
1044 Words | 5 PagesThroughout thousands of years, animal testing has been proven to be beneficial for the human race. While it has done a wonderful job for us, it has only injured, killed and put an enormous amount of pain on animals. The exact number of animals used in research yearly is unknown, due to official government statistics not including mice, rats, birds, fish, or other animals used for testing: some estimates put the total number to be 26 million. The use of animals for scientific research is cruel and inhumane, while both humans and animals share similar traits, they are both made up of completely different genes making them poor test subjects to begin with and may mislead or cause side effects for both parties.
Arguments Against Animal Testing
1259 Words | 6 PagesAccording to Humane Society International, the definition of animal testing is “the procedure performed on living animals for purposes of research.” These procedures can be used to analyze the effects of medicine, check the safety of products used daily by humans, or build an understanding of biology and disease. When one reviews all of the scientific research regarding animal cruelty, it is clear to see that the negative aspects of animal testing far outway the benefits that could come from it. This is proven through explanation of the historical context of this issue, statistics involving it, and alternatives that could be used in an effort to end animal testing. Before one can begin to argue the point that testing negatively affects animals,
Essay On Why Animal Testing Is Necessary
1130 Words | 5 PagesIn spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.
Animal Testing Is Inhumane Essay
431 Words | 2 PagesAll animals are different in some way. This could mean tests on animals could be misleading. Certain chemicals could be bad for animals yet good for humans, or vice versa. Animal test are much more expensive than using a human for tests. Humane Society International has compared animal tests with in vitro counterparts.
Argumentative Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?
859 Words | 4 PagesScience researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.
Animal Testing Utilitarianism
2744 Words | 11 PagesIntroduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.
Should Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 PagesAnimal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.
More about The Cruelty Of Animal Testing
Scientific Boundaries In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1132 Words | 5 PagesAnimal Testing Dbq
796 Words | 4 PagesPersuasive Essay: The Role Of Animal Testing In The World
643 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing Controversy
1632 Words | 7 PagesThe Ethicality Of Animal Experimentation
1144 Words | 5 PagesInaccurate Animal Testing
400 Words | 2 PagesThe Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing In Medical Research
1866 Words | 8 PagesAnimal Testing Is Cruel And Inhumane
1044 Words | 5 PagesArguments Against Animal Testing
1259 Words | 6 PagesEssay On Why Animal Testing Is Necessary
1130 Words | 5 PagesAnimal Testing Is Inhumane Essay
431 Words | 2 PagesArgumentative Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?
859 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing Utilitarianism
2744 Words | 11 PagesShould Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 Pages