By changing to a more healthier menu, that will contain mainly of wheat bread, the student will no longer smell fresh baked yeast rolls that comes right out of the oven at lunch time. School lunches are sometimes the only lunch students get a day. Some families may not be able to afford food for their house, and therefore some children may only eat at school. These students will have less food on their trays because of the new regulations will not allow them to be able to get the food they most rightly need to get through the day. Those students who can barley afford a meal at school will be devastated by the new price increase because of the new, healthier food. School lunches used to be the be delectable and very appetizing, by changing the menu, the menu will change dramaticly in flavor. Some new item to the menu may look unappetizing and not look eatable. Most students will mostly likely skip lunch because of the change. Students will no longer be able to have the most need nutrients through out the day. Most student athletes have a very busy schedule and only have time to eat lunch at school. They will no longer get the protein that they need to finish the day, and make
I believe that if schools start to make their lunches healthier, and start taking the UN healthy foods out then students will stop eating school lunch. The food that they feed us already is not in the best of condition. School's have already taken the majority of the UN healthy foods out of school as it is. So to take out anymore food would be ridiculous. over half of the students pack their lunch as it is. If the students stop eating school lunches then that is money the school is losing. the schools lunches barely have any food you can get anyhow, so to take anymore away wouldn't even be a lunch. The food that we are served in the cafeterias are in decent conditions. I personally think that we have healthy lunches as it is. We are served
Most students don 't think the school lunches are very good. In fact at the Thompson school district teamed up with colorado state University and did a survey on how students like school lunches, and it showed that 93% of students would like a better lunch. The lunch we have now in the schools now these days are cheaply made and governed by the government. We need food that tastes good so are brains can function properly the way they need too. Students need their brain to be functioning right so students can pay attention in class. Grades would probably be better in the long run. Kids wouldn 't be crabby all the time I don 't think, most of them anyway.
Have you ever wondered if you could ever change the school lunches in the Public schools? Well you’re not the only one, many other people thought about changing the way you eat at lunch and started to change it. Some trials have failed but some have succeeded at the trail for their public school. But some administrators what it to come to all schools, for the fact that they are losing money because kids stopped eating lunches at school. The school lunches impacting more than just the schools money, it’s impacting the students education and after school activities just like sports teams.
Finally, it is a great idea that someone care about student weight and health. Parent doesn’t need to worry about kids lunches, Kids can lose weight or obese, and how governors thinking that parent not giving kids healthy food. This is why the article is right about the school needing to keep healthy food for the
I believe that the lunch menu at schools should not change to a more healthier lunch. In fact, it would most likely cause a lot of issues between parents and the school board. Students would not like the fact that all their favorite foods are gone. Also, students would start packing their own lunches at home and bringing their packed lunch to school. Some kids might just go without eating all together. Teachers could start to complain or the lunch lady's about the lunch change. Another thing is the school could get a bad name or reputation if enough people complain about it to. If the menu is not changed it would save a lot of trouble in the long run. People think the menu should change due to obesity, obesity has nothing to do with healthy
A recent study found that children who regularly ateschool lunches were 29 percent more likely to beobese than their peers who brought lunch fromhome. Health science has advanced greatly since theinception of the National School Lunch Program in1946. When a 2008 Institute of Medicine committeecomprising 14 child-nutrition experts examined dataon the content of school lunches in the UnitedStates, its findings were stark. The updated standards aligned school meals withthe 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans byincreasing quantities of fruits, vegetables, andwhole grains; establishing calorie ranges; andlimiting trans fats and sodium. Children consume almost half of their total caloriesat school, and the National School Lunch Programprovides
The school should not change the lunches. Lunches are already healthy. If the school does change it the students may not buy the lunch. Students may start bringing unhealthy food from home. The school lunches can not get healthier. Mrs. Obama changed the school lunches a few months in being first woman. She done so with no child left behind. The lunch ladies will not let you through the line with out getting fruits and vegetables. Which is really good it makes sure the student is getting a healthy lunch. The food students are served is deprived of most of the unhealthy items: such as trans fat, high amount of calories, and others. The students that is probably will not like the food if it made any healthier. If the students do not
Cafeteria food isn't the best. It never has been and probably never will be. But if you take away the few items that the students do like, they would be very dissatisfied with this change for a healthier lunch menu. You don't need to have unsatisfied students just to change a lunch menu. I agree that being healthy is important. But changing it to where the students wouldn't even want to eat is a bit much. To me, and I'm sure many other students changing the menu for a healthier one would be a bad idea. We would think, if you take what we like to eat what will we eat? We may think, why take something that's already bad and make it worse? We already like very few items on the menu so why change it? Teachers and staff get tired of hearing us
Do you think school lunches are healthy for you or no? Allowing the principal to let us change the meals would lead to less healthy foods then they already are. Its a good thing to have healthier foods since they provide energy for the school day, allowing kids focused more on there works then there stomach growling. .
Everyone knows that school lunch is greasy, unhealthy, and gross. Some students can not afford to bring lunch to school everyday, therefore leaving them no choice but to eat the school lunch. The schools should provide healthier, better tasting options for students to give them more energy throughout the day. I think that schools should change their lunch menu to new, healthier choices for students. Although changing the lunch menu would be better for students, it has a lot of conflicts. For one, healthier lunch choices would be much more costly. If schools pay more for lunches, then they would have to cut back on other things. Another concern is that most students do not like to eat healthy and would not appreciate what the school is
The food in the school might not be healthy but, its good food for students. The school lunches at our school are an OK meal for to eat. I think that the school lunch menu should not be changed because the food is good how it is and students might not like the healthier lunches. There is nothing wrong with the food we eat in school, its better than nothing. The food is good how it is and if it were to change some students might not even eat. If the food made for school wasn't good then the students would just eat at home. There should be no change from what the food is to a healthier food because the food we eat isn't really that unhealthy. The school has healthy foods to eat with your lunch such as salads, vegetables, fruit and
Cafeteria food in schools is made to be healthy for students, but is it really healthy for students if they think it is foul and do not want to eat it? Should schools change the healthy foods to foods that students would actually want to eat? School food’s job is to be healthy and tasty to get the students through their day, but sadly school lunches tend to miss the mark on both accounts. Public schools rely on money from the government to supply food to their students, but due to several cutbacks the thing served in the cafeteria is hardly food at all. We all know the stereotypical school food mystery meat Monday or a slab of grey mush and sadly that is not too far from what it is in reality. Even with the “healthy” options most school supply is packed with harmful preservatives and chemicals that harm our youth from buying the cheapest possible edible green thing. As a country does not seem to want to invest into healthy and better futures for our young people.
Yes we most definitely have healthier school lunches there would be no more bullying,active kids, and no obese kids. It would be amazing if the school lunches could be healthy. It would also be a life changing thing for all of the obese kids in the world.